Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Chrono titles

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconSquare Enix Project‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Square Enix, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Square Enix-related merchandise and video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
ProjectThis page does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
WikiProject iconVideo games Project‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
ProjectThis page does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Working definition

The working definition is apparently "video game titles in the Chrono series".--Pharos 01:12, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vital improvements

This topic meets current criteria perfectly well.--Pharos 01:12, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Potential improvements

Of course the bringing up of the GA articles to FA, particularly the lead article, would be an improvement.--Pharos 01:12, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possible additions

Currently the scope is limited to the individual video game titles themselves. There is room for the addition of other members of {{Chrono series}}, particularly those of a more general nature pertaining to the series as a whole.--Pharos 01:12, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chrono Resurrection strikes me as a fairly obvious addition, and is already GA - rst20xx (talk) 18:54, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rename to "Chrono titles"?

As per naming conventions demonstrated in other featured topics (Super Smash Bros may appear to be an exception to this, but the titles are the only articles on the topic in existence I think) - rst20xx (talk) 18:57, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

...Well I'm gonna do it - rst20xx (talk) 20:11, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]