Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Animation/Machinima work group

Animation: Machinima Project‑class

This page is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles Project This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. This page is supported by the Machinima work group.

WikiProject Animation
Information
Main page Discussion + Help Popular pages Recognized content Style guide
Archives 1, 2, 3, Index Threads older than 30 days may be archived by MiszaBot II .
Departments Assessment (Log) ⇒ A-Class FAQ ⇒ A-Class review ⇒ B-Class FAQ Collaboration Peer review Outreach ⇒ Newsletters
Project organization Deletion sorting Maintenance Participants Project banner Project category Resources Stubs Templates New articles Tasks To-do list
Task forces American Talk Films Talk Animated television Talk People Talk Asian Talk Canadian Talk Computer DreamWorks Animation Talk European Talk Family Guy Talk Hanna-Barbera Talk Looney Tunes Talk Machinima Talk Pixar Talk Skydance Media Talk SpongeBob SquarePants Talk Stop motion Talk Warner Bros. Animation Talk Web animation Talk World
Related projects Anime and manga Biography Comics Film Fictional characters Television Media franchises Video games
Descendant projects ⇒ Avatar: The Last Airbender ⇒ Cartoon Network ⇒ Disney ⇒ Futurama ⇒ G.I. Joe ⇒ My Little Pony ⇒ Nickelodeon ⇒ South Park ⇒ The Simpsons ⇒ Transformers
Animation Portal • Changes
v t e

archives

---

1. May 2006 – December 2006

Does anyone have an opinion on what to do with these articles?

In the absence of any other opinions, I've tagged both articles, for now, as falling within the scope of WikiProject Machinima, the main rationale being that it is quite possible that anyone who can expand their articles may likely have heard of them through Red vs. Blue. — TKD::Talk 04:45, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hey it says on our project page that the wikiproject films is our parent project, but we're not listed as one of their decendant projects. shouldn't we be. Any thoughts?????

peace - Threewaysround 00:47, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Church is now a GA, and is in the category machinima GA articles, but it isn't changed on our rateing scale thingy, i'm not sure how to change it so could somebody else do it? thanx

peace out-Threewaysround 20:17, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is a bot that picks up changes to ratings about once a day. It's reflected in the statistics now. — TKD::Talk 16:05, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was

I don't know whether anyone else still watches this page, but Halo: Combat Evolved has been scheduled for November 15 as the featured article for that day. Red vs. Blue is mentioned and linked to from that blurb, so that article might see additional traffic. — TKD::Talk 12:07, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As you

• The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.
• The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of
  a rubric
  , and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.
• A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as
  described here
  .

Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at Category:C-Class_articles. If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages. The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles.

Please

Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.

We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations.

A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible.

We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 22:35, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Video games is looking to clean up both inactive and limited-scope WikiProjects dealing with video games and move these into task forces of WikiProject Video games, as outlined at Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Inactive project cleanup. This message is being posted to this project to first see if this project is currently active, and if there is consensus to move this project into a task force. We ask that if this project is still active, that you determine as a project if this project should remain separate from WikiProject Video games, and let us know your intentions. Please let us know within the month; those projects that do not respond within that time will be assumed to be inactive and will be cleaned up automatically. This is not a mandatory process; we will not attempt to do anything to your project if there is no consensus or consensus against moving it. However, we do urge you to consider if your project needs to remain separate from WikiProject Video games. Please let us know if you have any questions on this. (Guyinblack25 ^talk 21:16, 22 January 2009 (UTC))[reply]

I know some of these people are still active; does anyone read this? I support the moving this project to a task force under

WP:VG, as will give the project a lot more attention and give it use of the existing support structure (peer review, assessment, etc.). User:TKD I think is really the make-or-break on this one. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 17:34, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

Well, it looks I am going to convert into a work group of

WP:ANIMATION since it is no longer active. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 21:43, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group. If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot (Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 05:53, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is a notice to let you know about