Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aviation/Peer review
![]() | Aviation Project‑class | ||||||
|
Aviation Peer Review
A-class review instructions say that an article only gets 4 days for review. Do we consider revising? There aren't enough people involved in reviewing right now. Perhaps we post a notice on the Project and task force talk pages? --Born2flie (talk) 03:31, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
- I aggree. I changed it to 'a sufficient time' for now, until it gets more active here. - Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 16:02, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Powered hang glider
Hello, I have sumbitted the
New process
I know WP:Aviation mirrored the WP:MILHIST peer review process, but I wonder if a process similar to the
Peer review request for General aviation in the United Kingdom
Not sure what has happened here. I followed the procedure for adding a PR request, and whilst the note shows, the title doesn't. Anyone able to help?--FactotEm (talk) 17:13, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
Good Article nominations section
Since the bot is not updating Template:WPAVIATION Announcements now, can we list the GA reviews in a section on the pee review page, say below the "Non-article featured content candidates" section? Thanks. -Fnlayson (talk) 21:55, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
- As pointed out by User:Nimbus227, the announcements template data comes from WP:WikiProject Aviation/Article alerts and can be updated manually. So adding GA reviews on this page is not that critical. Thanks. -Fnlayson (talk) 13:13, 2 June 2010 (UTC)