Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Venezuela
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WikiProject Venezuela page. |
|
.svg){kind=small} | Venezuela Project‑class | ||||||
| |||||||
 | This page is for discussing broón:Venezuela |
| 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Requested move at Talk:Elisabeth Burgos-Debray#Requested move 5 March 2024
Talk:Elisabeth Burgos-Debray#Requested move 5 March 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Kiwiz1338 (talk) 12:11, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
]
Open Arbcom case
Please see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Venezuelan_politics.—S Marshall T/C 10:49, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Venezuelan politics opened
An arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Venezuelan politics. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Venezuelan politics/Evidence. Please add your evidence by April 20, 2024, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Venezuelan politics/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 13:56, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- What is the decision that is questioned here? Evidence with respect to what?--ReyHahn (talk) 15:55, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- @ReyHahn: The scope is "Conduct in the topic area of Venezuelan politics, with a specific focus on named parties". The preliminary statements can be found here: Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Venezuelan politics/Preliminary statements, and said parties are S Marshall (filer), WMrapids and myself. --NoonIcarus (talk) 13:14, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but this vocabulary is so foreign to me that I don't know how I can be of help. In the Spanish version there is no Arbitration committee, and just seeing how leguleyo and absurb the subject is, it seems to me that it is not so necessary to have one of those either. Good luck to all parties, they will definitely need it! Oscar_. (talk) 18:01, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- The relevance beyond any individuals is that one proposal under consideration is to make Venezuelan politics a contentious topic; contentious topics are subject to special editing rules. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:36, 15 April 2024 (UTC)]
- What kind of rules?--ReyHahn (talk) 18:47, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- The restrictions include page protections and revert limits, among others. From what I gather, it's up for the Arbitration Committee to decide which to apply, if any. --NoonIcarus (talk) 18:50, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- What kind of rules?--ReyHahn (talk) 18:47, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- The relevance beyond any individuals is that one proposal under consideration is to make Venezuelan politics a
- I'm sorry, but this vocabulary is so foreign to me that I don't know how I can be of help. In the Spanish version there is no Arbitration committee, and just seeing how leguleyo and absurb the subject is, it seems to me that it is not so necessary to have one of those either. Good luck to all parties, they will definitely need it! Oscar_. (talk) 18:01, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- @ReyHahn: The scope is "Conduct in the topic area of Venezuelan politics, with a specific focus on named parties". The preliminary statements can be found here: Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Venezuelan politics/Preliminary statements, and said parties are S Marshall (filer), WMrapids and myself. --NoonIcarus (talk) 13:14, 15 April 2024 (UTC)