Bara Balutedar

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

The Bara Balutedar (English: Twelve Balutedar) system was a

hereditary system of twelve trades used historically in villages of regions that is now the Indian state of Maharashtra. The balutedars used get paid for the services provided with village produce under a complex barter system. The system had similarities to the jajmani system
prevalent in North India during the same period.

Classification and functions

The balutedar system was supported by the village

communities
under this system provided services to the farmers and the economic system of the village. There were different kinds of services under Bara Balutedar which could number more than twelve

  • barbers
    )
  • washers
    )
  • carpenters
    )
  • blacksmiths
    )
  • oil pressers
    )
  • Koli (Fishing, agriculturist and water transport), The Kolis were found in about one-third of the villages. The provided water to the travellers, and at the rivers, made rafts and boats and were agriculturist. The rent-free land holdings of the Kolis were very considerable, being 16,307 bighas in Khandesh.
  • Mang (manufacturing of organic fiber, making rope and article, making organic broom, security of people call as raakhanyaa)
  • Mahar (village security, messengers, catching criminals, land arbitrators, and removal of animal carcasses
  • Chaugula (assistant to Patil)
  • Mulani (Masjid keeper) - in villages with large muslim population.[2][3]

Under the baluta system, the balutedars had certain rights and privileges at ceremonies. Their services were remunerated by the cultivators in the form of an annual payment in sheaves of

corn and a few seers of other grain grown in the field,[4] such as wheat, hulga, gram, tur, groundnut, and others. For special services rendered on ceremonial occasions, payments were made in cash, grain
or clothes. Sometimes food was given.

The barber, as a balutedar, would perform many duties not connected with his profession. At the time of a marriage ceremony, when the bridegroom went to the temple to pray, he held his horse and received a turban as a present. At village festivals or marriage ceremonies he sometimes acted as a cook, and also served food and water to the guests at such ceremonies. It was his privilege to act as a messenger at marriage ceremonies and call the invitees for the function. He gave massages to distinguished people of the village. He played the pipe and tambour at weddings and on other festive occasions.

The water-carrier not only supplied water to the villages but also kept watch during floods in the case of villages situated on river banks. He was also useful to the villagers to take them across the river with the help of a sangad (floats joined together.[5] In this list of Balutedar: Dhor, Mang, Mahar, and Chambhar belonged to the untouchable group of castes.[6] In exchange for their services, the balutedars were granted hereditary rights (watan) to a share in the village harvest.[7] The system was formally abolished by statute in 1958.

See also

References

  1. ^ Kulkarni, A. R. "Social and Economic Position of Brahmins in Maharashtra in the Age of Shivaji." Proceedings of the Indian History Congress, vol. 26, 1964, pp. 66–75. JSTOR, https://www.jstor.org/stable/44140322. Accessed 15 June 2020.
  2. ^ Fukazawa, Hiroshi. “RURAL SERVANTS IN THE 18TH CENTURY MAHARASHTRIAN VILLAGE—DEMIURGIC OR JAJMANI SYSTEM?” Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, vol. 12, no. 2, 1972, pp. 14–40. JSTOR, https://www.jstor.org/stable/43295541. Accessed 29 Jan. 2024.
  3. ^ Altekar, Anant Sadashiv. A History of Village Communities in Western India. No. 5. H. Milford, Oxford University Press, 1927.
  4. .
  5. . Retrieved 13 December 2016.
  6. ^ Sugandhe, Anand, and Vinod Sen. "Scheduled Castes in Maharashtra: Struggle and Hurdles in Their Socio-Economic Development". Journal of Indian Research (ISSN: 2321-4155) 3.3 (2015): 53-64.[1]
  7. ^ Fukazawa, H., 1972. Rural Servants in the 18th Century Maharashtrian Village—Demiurgic or Jajmani System?. Hitotsubashi journal of economics, 12(2), pp.14-40.