Creative accounting

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
"Cooking the books" redirects here. For the Black Books episode, see
Cooking the Books (Black Books episode). For the New Zealand television cooking program, see Cook the Books (TV program)
.
Part of a series on
Accounting
Early 19th-century German ledger
Major types
  • Tax
Key concepts
Selected accounts
Management Accounting Principles
Management discussion
  • Financial statement analysis
    		•
    Double-entry system
  • FIFO and LIFO
  • Journal
  • Ledger / General ledger
  • Trial balance
    		•
    Firms
  • Report
  • Sarbanes–Oxley Act
    		•
    People and organizations
    Development
    Misconduct

    Creative accounting is a

    standard accounting practices, but deviate from the spirit of those rules with questionable accounting ethics—specifically distorting results in favor of the "preparers", or the firm that hired the accountant.[1] They are characterized by excessive complication and the use of novel ways of characterizing income, assets, or liabilities, and the intent to influence readers towards the interpretations desired by the authors. The terms "innovative" or "aggressive" are also sometimes used. Another common synonym is "cooking the books". Creative accounting is oftentimes used in tandem with outright financial fraud (including securities fraud), and lines between the two are blurred. Creative accounting practices have been known since ancient times and appear world-wide in various forms.[1]

    "Every company in the country is fiddling its profits. Every set of published accounts is based on books which have been gently cooked or completely roasted. The figures which are fed twice a year to the investing public have all been changed in order to protect the guilty. It is the biggest con trick since the

    Trojan horse
    . ... In fact this deception is all in perfectly good taste. It is totally legitimate. It is creative accounting."

    The term as generally understood refers to systematic misrepresentation of the true

    accounting reform—usually centering on an updated analysis of capital and factors of production
    that would correctly reflect how value is added.

    Newspaper and television journalists have hypothesized that the

    The Producers by Mel Brooks, where it is also known as Hollywood accounting.[3]

    Motivations behind creative accounting

    The underlining purpose for creative accounting is to "present [a] business in the best possible light" typically by manipulating recorded profits or costs.[4] Company managers who participate in creative accounting can have a variety of situational motivations for doing so, including:

    • Market and stockholder expectations of profits
    • Personal incentives
    • Bonus-related pay
    • Benefits from shares and share options
    • Job security
    • Personal satisfaction
    • Cover-up fraud
    • Tax management
    • Management buyouts
    • Debt covenant
    • Manager's self-interest
    • Mergers and acquisitions

    Types/examples of creative accounting schemes

    Earnings management

    Main article: Earnings management

    Creative accounting can be used to manage earnings.

    financial reporting and in structuring transactions to alter financial reports to either mislead some stakeholders about the underlying economic performance of a company or influence contractual outcomes that depend on reported accounting numbers.[6]

    Hollywood accounting

    Main article: Hollywood accounting

    Practiced by some Hollywood film studios, creative accounting can be used to conceal earnings of a film to distort the profit participation promised to certain participants of the film's earnings. Essentially, participants in the gross revenue of the film stay unaffected but profit participants are presented with a deflated or negative number on profitability, leading to less or no payments to them following a film's success. Famous examples of deceiving good faith profit participants involve Darth Vader actor David Prowse (with $729M adjusted gross earnings on Return of the Jedi)[7] and Forrest Gump novel writer Winston Groom (with $661M gross theatrical revenue)[8]—both of whom have been paid $0 on their profit participation due to the films "being in the red".[9][8]

    Tobashi schemes

    Main article: Tobashi scheme

    This form of creative accounting—now considered a criminal offense in Japan, where it originated—involves the sale, swap or other form of temporary trade of a liability of one company with another company within the holding's portfolio, often solely created to conceal losses of the first firm. These schemes were popular in the 1980s in Japan before the government instituted harsher civil laws and eventually criminalized the practice. The Enron scandal revealed that Enron had extensively made use of sub-corporations to offload debts and hide its true losses in a Tobashi fashion.

    Lehman Brothers' Repo 105 scheme

    Main article: Repo 105

    Lehman Brothers utilized repurchase agreements to bolster profitability reports with their Repo 105 scheme under the watch of the accounting firm Ernst & Young. The scheme consisted of mis-reporting a repurchase agreement (a promise to re-buy a liability or asset after selling it) as a sale, and timing it exactly in a way that half of the transaction was completed before a profitability reporting deadline, half after—hence bolstering profitability numbers on paper. Public prosecutors in New York filed suit against EY for allowing the "accounting fraud involving the surreptitious removal of tens of billions of dollars of fixed income securities from Lehman's balance sheet in order to deceive the public about Lehman's true liquidity condition".[10]

    buy Nigerian barges from Enron, only for Enron to buy them back a few months later. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed charges and convicted multiple Merrill Lynch executives of aiding the fraud.[11]

    Currency swap concealment of Greek debt by Goldman Sachs

    See also: Goldman Sachs § Involvement in the European sovereign debt crisis

    In 2001–2002,

    Gary Cohn pitched Athens another deal. After Greece refused the second deal, the firm sold its Greek swaps to the Greek national bank and made sure its Short and Long positions towards Greece were in balance—so that a potential Greek default would not affect Goldman Sachs.[14]

    Parmalat's mis-accounted credit-linked notes

    See also: Parmalat § Financial fraud (2002–2005)

    Italian dairy giant

    Grant Thornton International), but once audited more vigorously during the bankruptcy proceedings, it was discovered that the company's debt turned out to actually be $14.5Bn.[17] This massive debt was largely caused by failed operations in Latin America and increasingly complex financial instruments used to mask debt—such as Parmalat "billing itself" through a subsidiary called Epicurum.[18] It was also discovered that its CEO Calisto Tanzi had ordered the creation of shell accounts and diverted 900M Euros worth into his private travel company.[17]

    Offshoring and tax avoidance

    See also: Offshore financial centre, Offshore Leaks, and Tax avoidance

    In order to avoid taxes on profits, multinational corporations often make use of offshore subsidiaries in order to employ a creative accounting technique known as "Minimum-Profit Accounting". The subsidiary is created in a tax haven—often just as a shell company—then charges large fees to the primary corporation, effectively minimizing or wholly wiping out the profit of the main corporation. Within most parts of the European Union and the United States, this practice is perfectly legal and often executed in plain sight or with explicit approval of tax regulators.[19]

    Nike, Inc. famously employed offshoring by selling its Swoosh logo to a Bermuda-based special-purpose entity subsidiary for a nominal amount, and then went on to "charge itself" licensing fees that Nike Inc. had to pay to the subsidiary in order to use its own brand in Europe. The Dutch tax authorities were aware of and approved of this siphoning structure, but did not publish the private agreement they had with Nike.[20] The licensing fees totaled $3.86Bn over the course of 3 years and were discovered due to an unrelated U.S.-based lawsuit as well as the Paradise Papers.[21] In 2014, the Bermuda deal with Dutch authorities expired, and Nike shifted the profits to another offshore subsidiary, a Netherlands-based Limited Liability Partnership (CV, short for Commanditaire Vennootschap, generally known as a Kommanditgesellschaft). Through a Dutch tax loophole, CV's owned by individuals that are residing in the Netherlands are tax-free. Exploiting this structure saved Nike more than $1Bn in taxes annually and reduced its global tax rate to 13.1%; the company is currently being pursued for billions of dollars worth of back taxes in litigation by multiple governments for this multinational tax avoidance.[22]

    A number of business documentaries ( 72 ) center around financial scandals and securities fraud that involved creative accounting practices:

    See also

    References

    1. ^
      ISBN 978-0-470-05765-0
      .
    2. ISBN 1-134-69451-2
      .
    3. ^ The Producers – From the Current – The Criterion Collection
    4. ^ "Creative accounting – Motives, techniques and possibilities of prevention". ResearchGate. Retrieved 2020-07-05.
    5. ^ "Creative Accounting". Investopedia. Retrieved 14 January 2014.
    6. ^ Healy, P. M. and J. M. Wahlen. 'A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting', Accounting Horizons, December 1999, pp. 365–383.
    7. ^ "Star Wars Movies at the Box Office". Box Office Mojo. Retrieved 2019-09-23.
    8. ^ a b "'Gump' a Smash but Still in the Red, Paramount Says: Movies: Writer, who is due to get 3% of net profits, hires lawyer to question the studio's accounting practices". Los Angeles Times. 1995-05-24. Retrieved 2019-09-23.
    9. ^ "Why Do All Hollywood Movies Lose Money?". Priceonomics. 30 July 2013. Retrieved 2019-09-23.
    10. ^ "Attorney General Cuomo Sues Ernst & Young For Assisting Lehman Brothers In Financial Fraud | New York State Attorney General". ag.ny.gov. 21 December 2010. Retrieved 2019-09-23.
    11. ^ "SEC Charges Merrill Lynch, Four Merrill Lynch Executives with Aiding and Abetting Enron Accounting Fraud". www.sec.gov. Retrieved 2019-09-28.
    12. ^ "Goldman Sachs details 2001 Greek derivative trades". Reuters. 2010-02-22. Retrieved 2019-09-23.
    13. ^ Balzli, Beat (2010-02-08). "Greek Debt Crisis: How Goldman Sachs Helped Greece to Mask its True Debt". Spiegel Online. Retrieved 2019-09-23.
    14. ^ "Goldman Sachs Shorted Greek Debt After It Arranged Those Shady Swaps". Business Insider. Retrieved 2019-09-23.
    15. ^ "Europe's biggest bankruptcy remembered". www.europeanceo.com. Retrieved 2019-09-29.
    16. ^ Goldstein, Steve. "Parmalat: A disaster, but no Enron". MarketWatch. Retrieved 2019-09-29.
    17. ^
      ISSN 0261-3077
      . Retrieved 2019-09-29.
    18. ISBN 978-1-317-83471-7
      .
    19. ^ "Nike's Sweetheart Dutch Tax Deal Ignored 'Economic Reality,' EU Says". ICIJ. 8 July 2019. Retrieved 2019-09-30.
    20. ^ "Nike's Sweetheart Dutch Tax Deal Ignored 'Economic Reality,' EU Says". ICIJ. 8 July 2019. Retrieved 2019-09-30.
    21. ^ "Nike Stays Ahead Of The Regulators". ICIJ. 6 November 2017. Retrieved 2019-09-30.
    22. ISSN 0261-3077
      . Retrieved 2019-09-30.

    Further reading
    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Creative_accounting&oldid=1283211406"