Descent propulsion system
Country of origin | United States |
---|---|
Date | 1964–1972 |
Designer | Gerard W. Elverum Jr. |
Manufacturer | Pressure-fed |
Pumps | None |
Configuration | |
Chamber | 1 |
Nozzle ratio |
|
Performance | |
Thrust, vacuum | 10,500 lbf (47 kN) maximum, throttleable between 1,050 and 6,825 lbf (4.67–30.36 kN) |
Throttle range | 10%–60%, full thrust |
Thrust-to-weight ratio | 25.7 (weight on Earth) |
Chamber pressure |
|
Specific impulse, vacuum |
|
Burn time | 1030 seconds |
Restarts | Designed for 2 restarts, tested up to four times on Apollo 9 |
Gimbal range | 6° pitch and yaw |
Dimensions | |
Length |
|
Diameter |
|
Dry mass | 394 lb (179 kg) |
Used in | |
Lunar module as descent engine | |
References | |
References | [1][2] |
The descent propulsion system (DPS - pronounced 'dips') or lunar module descent engine (LMDE), internal designation VTR-10, is a variable-
2O
4) oxidizer. This engine used a pintle injector
Requirements
The propulsion system for the descent stage of the lunar module was designed to transfer the vehicle, containing two crewmen, from a 60-nautical-mile (110 km) circular lunar parking orbit to an elliptical descent orbit with a
Development
According to NASA history publication Chariots for Apollo, "The lunar module descent engine probably was the biggest challenge and the most outstanding technical development of Apollo."
Grumman held a bidders' conference on March 14, 1963, attended by Aerojet General, Reaction Motors Division of Thiokol, United Technology Center Division of United Aircraft, and Space Technology Laboratories, Inc. (STL). In May, STL was selected as the competitor to Rocketdyne's concept. STL proposed an engine that was gimbaled as well as throttleable, using flow control valves and a variable-area pintle injector, in much the same manner as does a shower head, to regulate pressure, rate of propellant flow, and the pattern of fuel mixture in the combustion chamber.[7]
The first full-throttle firing of Space Technology Laboratories' LM descent engine was carried out in early 1964. NASA planners expected one of the two drastically different designs would emerge the clear winner, but this did not happen throughout 1964. Apollo Spacecraft Program Office manager Joseph Shea formed a committee of NASA, Grumman and Air Force propulsion experts, chaired by American spacecraft designer Maxime Faget, in November 1964 to recommend a choice, but their results were inconclusive. Grumman chose Rocketdyne on January 5, 1965. Still not satisfied, MSC Director Robert R. Gilruth convened his own five-member board, also chaired by Faget, which reversed Grumman's decision on January 18 and awarded the contract to STL.[7][8]
To keep the DPS as simple, lightweight, and reliable as possible, the propellants were pressure-fed with
The design and development of the innovative thrust chamber and pintle design is credited to TRW Aerospace Engineer Gerard W. Elverum Jr.[10][11][12] The engine could throttle between 1,050 and 10,125 pounds-force (4.67–45.04 kN) but operation between 65% and 92.5% thrust was avoided to prevent excessive nozzle erosion. It weighed 394 pounds (179 kg), with a length of 90.5 inches (230 cm) and diameter of 59.0 inches (150 cm).[6]
Performance in LM "life boat"
The LMDE achieved a prominent role in the
Modification for Extended Lunar Module

In order to extend landing payload weight and lunar surface stay times, the last three Apollo Lunar Modules were upgraded by adding a 10-inch (25 cm) nozzle extension to the engine to increase thrust. The nozzle exhaust bell, like the original, was designed to crush if it hit the surface. It never had on the first three landings, but did buckle on the first Extended landing, Apollo 15.
TR-201 in Delta second stage
After the Apollo program, the DPS was further developed into the TRW TR-201 engine. This engine was used in the second stage, referred to as Delta-P, of the Delta launch vehicle (Delta 1000, Delta 2000, Delta 3000 series) for 77 successful launches between 1972–1988.[13]
References
- ^ Bartlett, W.; Kirkland, Z. D.; Polifka, R. W.; Smithson, J. C.; Spencer, G. L. (7 February 1966). Apollo spacecraft liquid primary propulsion systems (PDF). Houston, TX: NASA, Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center. pp. 8–9. Archived (PDF) from the original on 23 August 2022. Retrieved 23 August 2022.
- ^ McCutcheon, Kimble D. (28 December 2021). "U.S. Manned Rocket Propulsion Evolution - Part 9.42: TRW Lunar Module Descent Engine (LMDE)". enginehistory.org. Retrieved 23 August 2022.
- ^ "REMEMBERING THE GIANTS - Apollo Rocket Propulsion Development - NASA" (PDF).
- ^ US Patent 3,205,656, Elverum Jr., Gerard W., "Variable thrust bipropellant rocket engine", issued 1963-02-25
- ^ US Patent 3,699,772, Elverum Jr., Gerard W., "Liquid propellant rocket engine coaxial injector", issued 1968-01-08
- ^ a b "Mechanical Design of the Lunar Module Descent Engine".
- ^ a b c d "Chapter 6. Lunar Module – Engines, Large and Small". Chariots for Apollo: A History of Manned Lunar Spacecraft. NASA History Program Office. SP-4205. Archived from the original on 11 October 2023.
- ^ "LM Descent Propulsion Development Diary". Encyclopedia Astronautica. Archived from the original on August 21, 2002.
- ^ a b Apollo Experience Report – Descent Propulsion System – NASA Technical Note: March 1973
- ^ US Patent 3,699,772A, Elverum Jr., Gerard W., "Liquid propellant rocket engine coaxial injector", issued 1968-01-08
- ^ US Patent 3,205,656, Elverum Jr., Gerard W., "Variable thrust bipropellant rocket engine", issued 1963-02-25
- doi:10.2514/6.2000-3871. Archived from the original(PDF) on 9 August 2017.
- ^ Ed Kyle. "Extended Long Tank Delta". Space Launch Report. Archived from the original on 7 August 2010. Retrieved May 11, 2014.