Fighter Mafia
The Fighter Mafia was a controversial group of
History
In the 1960s, both the
Combat during the
Boyd's work with
Boyd, defense analysts
- Contemporary Air Force generals established poor criteria for combat effectiveness that ignored historical combat data.[7]
- Design focus on high technology and planes that could go "higher, faster, and farther" increased costs and decreased effectiveness. The group's view was that cheaper designs would have been more effective.
- The bureaucracy of the Air Force was corrupt, allegedly dishonestly testing weapons before buying them and deploying them in the field.
- The focus of the USAF should have been on close air support and the use of combined arms to support maneuver warfare rather than air interdiction.[8][9][5]
- Multi-role and multi-mission capability plane designs were fundamentally compromised compared to specialized designs.
- Beyond-visual range combat was a fantasy.[7][10]
In 1969, under the guise that the Navy was developing a small, high-performance Navy aircraft, Riccioni won $149,000 to fund the "Study to Validate the Integration of Advanced Energy-Maneuverability Theory with Trade-Off Analysis". This money was split between
Legacy
As the Fighter Mafia attracted considerable controversy, the actual extent of their contribution to U.S. fighter design is a matter of debate.[6] The F-15 was the first jet plane in the USAF's history that was designed with maneuverability specifications in mind thanks to Boyd's E-M theory.[5] The Fighter Mafia argued for a bubble canopy (found in the F-15 and F-16) since it would allow the pilot more visibility to spot other airplanes to sneak up on them, to avoid being surprised, or to have better situational awareness in dogfights. However, not all of the Fighter Mafia's ideas were implemented.
The Fighter Mafia's preference was for an aircraft dedicated to
In light of the Mafia's disappointment with the F-15, the lightweight fighter was supposed to be the air-to-air superiority fighter that they wanted. Compared to the Red Bird concept, the LWF would cost even less. As the Mafia's civilian associate member Pierre Sprey argued that sneaking up on an unaware opponent was the most important criterion of a good fighter, the LWF's small size would also make it less visible to the eye.[12] A faster supersonic cruising speed would make it more difficult for enemies to sneak up from behind. While conventional wisdom at the time considered twin engines to be safer, the F-16 challenged that view with a single-engine design.[2] However, production F-16s lacked supercruise capability as the Air Force saddled the F-16 with multi-mission equipment, air-to-ground features, and an active radar. Whereas the prototype YF-16 "whipped" other airplanes in dogfights, the production version was less maneuverable and performed worse in air-to-air combat.[5]
Hillaker, the F-16's chief designer, commented: "If I had realized at the time that the airplane would have been used as a multimission, primarily an air-to-surface airplane as it is used now, I would have designed it differently."
Criticism
Critics argue that the F-15 and F-16 succeeded because they moved away from the Fighter Mafia's ideas, seeing significant export success because they were multi-role aircraft with active radar homing missiles.[11] The "Red Bird" concept designed by the Fighter Mafia included no radar, no sophisticated avionics, and was armed only with a cannon and infrared homing missiles.[11] By comparison, the F-16 includes sophisticated avionics systems, AN/APG-66 radar, as well as AIM-7 Sparrow and AIM-120 AMRAAM radar-guided missiles.
Proponents of the
The Fighter Mafia have been criticized for their lack of combat experience and aeronautical expertise. Only Boyd had brief air combat experience (in the Korean War) and did not achieve any kills as a fighter pilot. Riccioni had seen no combat before he was assigned to the Pentagon. Sprey has been characterized as "a dilettante with an engineering degree but no military experience".[11]
References
- ^ Bjorkman, Eileen. "The Outrageous Adolescence of the F-16". Air & Space Magazine.
- ^ a b c Hehs, Eric (15 April 1991). "F-16 Designer Harry Hillaker". Code One Magazine.
- ^ "Member of Fighter Mafia Passes". Project On Government Oversight. 2015-05-06. Retrieved 2021-03-16.
Colonel Everest E. "Rich" Riccioni USAF (ret.) passed away on April 15 in Monument, Colorado, at the age of 91.
- ^ ISBN 0-07-134696-1.
- ^ ISBN 0-316-88146-5.
- ^ Air & Space Power Journal – Chronicles Online Journal. United States: Air force. Archived from the originalon 2006-04-26. Retrieved 2006-08-10.
- ^ a b Sprey, Pierre. "Evaluating Weapons: Sorting the Good from the Bad" (PDF). Pogo archives. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-03-19. Retrieved 2017-12-17.
- ^ Sprey, Pierre (May 1974). "Notes on Close Air Support" (PDF). Pogo archives. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2018-01-13. Retrieved 2018-01-12.
- ^ Sprey, Pierre. "Combat Effectiveness Considerations In Designing Close Support Fighters" (PDF). Pogo archives. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-04-05. Retrieved 2017-12-17.
- ^ Higby, Patrick (30 March 2005). "Promise and Reality: Beyond Visual Range (BVR) Air-To-Air Combat" (PDF). Pogo archives. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 January 2019. Retrieved 17 December 2017.
- ^ a b c d Michel III, Marshall L. "The Revolt of the Majors: How the Air Force Changed After Vietnam" (Doctoral dissertation). Auburn University. Retrieved 2013-05-26.
- ^ Sprey, Pierre (April 1982). "Comparing the Effectiveness of Air-to-Air Fighters: F-86 to F-18" (PDF). Pogo archives. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2021-08-27. Retrieved 2023-09-12.
- ^ https://www.military.com/air-force/f-16xl-why-america-didnt-get-best-f-16.html/
- ^ "F-35 Managing the Battlespace". Lockheed Martin.
- ^ "F-35: Pierre Sprey vs (ret.) Lt Col David 'Chip' Berke debate". You Tube. Archived from the original on 2021-12-21.
Bibliography
- "The 'Fighter Mafia'". Edwards Air Force Base. January 1999. Archived from the original on March 6, 2005. Retrieved 2006-08-10.
- Hehs, Eric (April–July 1991). "Harry Hillaker — Father of the F-16". Code One: An Airpower Projection Magazine. Archived from the original on February 2, 2007.
- Hillaker, Harry (April–July 1997). "John Boyd, USAF Retired, Father of the F16". Code One: An Airpower Projection Magazine. Archived from the original on September 17, 2007.
External links
- Weaponization of Nostalgia: The F-15 & F-16 (Legacy of the Fighter Mafia) "Military Aviation History", YouTube