Fletcher v. Peck

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Fletcher v. Peck
U.S. LEXIS 322;
Case history
PriorDemurrer overruled, D. Mass
SubsequentNone
Holding
The Contracts Clause of the U.S. Constitution prohibited Georgia from voiding contracts for the transfer of land, even though they were secured through illegal bribery. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts affirmed.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Marshall
Associate Justices
William Cushing · Samuel Chase
Bushrod Washington · William Johnson
H. Brockholst Livingston · Thomas Todd
Case opinions
MajorityMarshall, joined by Cushing, Chase, Washington, Livingston, Todd
Concur/dissentJohnson
Laws applied
U.S. Const. art. I, § 10, cl. 1

Fletcher v. Peck, 10 U.S. (6 Cranch) 87 (1810), was a landmark United States Supreme Court decision in which the Supreme Court first ruled a state law unconstitutional. The decision created a growing precedent for the sanctity of legal contracts and hinted that Native Americans did not hold complete title to their own lands (an idea fully realized in Johnson v. McIntosh).[1]

Background

Following the

Georgia claimed possession of the Yazoo lands, a 54,000 sq mi (140,000 km2) region of the Indian Reserve, west of its own territory. The land later became the northern part of the states of Alabama and Mississippi.[2]

In 1795, the

Georgia legislature divided the area into four tracts. The state then sold the tracts to four separate land development companies for $500,000, about $0.014 per acre, a bargain even at 1790 prices. The Georgia legislature overwhelmingly approved this land grant, known as the Yazoo Land Act of 1795.[2] However, it was later revealed that the Yazoo Land Act had been approved in return for bribes in a scandal known as the Yazoo Land Scandal.[3] The voters rejected most of the incumbents in the next election
; the new legislature, reacting to the public outcry, repealed the law and voided the transactions made under it.

Robert Fletcher bought a tract of land from Peck after the 1795 act was repealed. Fletcher, in 1803, brought a suit against Peck, claiming that Peck had not had clear title to the land when he sold it.[4]

There was collusion between the two. Both would have their land secured if the Supreme Court decided that Native Americans did not hold original title. Fletcher set out to win the case.[5]

Court ruling

The Supreme Court unanimously (with a separate concurring opinion written by

Constitution, cannot be invalidated even if it is illegally secured.[6]

The ruling lent further protection to

William H. Rehnquist, wrote that Fletcher v. Peck "represented an attempt by Chief Justice Marshall to extend the protection of the contract clause to infant business".[7]

See also

References

  1. ^ Barker, Joanne (2022). "The Corporation and the Tribe". In Koshy, Susan (ed.). Colonial Racial Capitalism. Duke University Press. p. 41-45.
  2. ^ a b "Yazoo Land Fraud". New Georgia Encyclopedia. Retrieved May 8, 2024.
  3. ^ Lamplugh, George B. (3015). Yazoo Land Fraud. New Georgia Encyclopedia. Retrieved 13 May 2016
  4. ^ "Fletcher v. Peck". New Georgia Encyclopedia. Retrieved May 8, 2024.
  5. .
  6. ^ https://www.oyez.org/cases/1789-1850/10us87

Further reading

External links