HMS Hunter (1895)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

HMS Hunter
History
United Kingdom
NameHunter
BuilderFairfield Shipbuilding and Engineering Company, Govan
Laid down7 June 1894
Launched28 December 1895
CompletedMay 1896
FateSold for scrap, 1912
General characteristics
Class and typeHandy-class destroyer
Displacement275 long tons (279 t)
Length197 ft 3 in (60.1 m) (o/a)
Beam19 ft 5 in (5.9 m)
Draught7 ft 6 in (2.3 m)
Installed power
Propulsion2 triple-expansion steam engine
Speed27 knots (50 km/h; 31 mph)
Range1,270 nautical miles (2,350 km; 1,460 mi) at 11 knots (20 km/h; 13 mph)
Armament

HMS Hunter was one of three Handy-class destroyers built for the Royal Navy in the 1890s. Completed in 1896 she spent her career in home waters and was sold for scrap in 1912.

Description

Ordered as part of the 1893–1894 Naval Programme, the Hardy-class torpedo boat destroyers were

kW) and were intended to give a maximum speed of 27 knots (50 km/h; 31 mph).[2] During her sea trials Hunter reached a speed of 27.2 knots (50.4 km/h; 31.3 mph).[3] The Hardy's carried a maximum of 65 long tons (66 t) of coal that gave them a range of 1,270 nautical miles (2,350 km; 1,460 mi) at 11 knots (20 km/h; 13 mph).[2]

The ships were armed with a single

amidships and the other on the stern.[4]

Construction and career

Hunter was

tender to Excellent, the shore establishment near Portsmouth, was damaged in a collision with a tug at Portsmouth. Her crew was transferred to Hunter during repairs.[7]

She took part in the

coronation of King Edward VII.[8] The ship was sold for scrap in 1912.[9]

Notes

  1. ^ Chesneau & Kolesnik, pp. 90–92
  2. ^ a b Friedman, p. 291
  3. ^ March, p. 32
  4. ^ March, p. 31
  5. ^ Friedman, p. 302
  6. ^ "Naval Matters: Past and Prospective: The Reserve of Ships and Men". The Marine Engineer. Vol. 18. July 1896. p. 155.
  7. ^ "Naval & Military intelligence". The Times. No. 36634. London. 10 December 1901. p. 10.
  8. ^ "Naval Review at Spithead". The Times. No. 36847. London. 15 August 1902. p. 5.
  9. ^ Chesneau & Kolesnik, p. 92

Bibliography