Immanuel Hermann Fichte

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Immanuel Hermann Fichte
Speculative theism[1]
InstitutionsUniversity of Bonn
(1836–1842)
University of Tübingen
(1842–1863)
Academic advisorsJ. G. Fichte (his father)
Notable studentsChristian Hermann Weisse (epistolary correspondent)
Main interests
Metaphysics, ethics,
philosophy of religion
Notable ideas
Concrete theism

Immanuel Hermann Fichte (

Hegelian School
.

Life

Fichte was born in

full professor. Here he quickly became a successful and much admired lecturer. Dissatisfied with the reactionary tendencies of the Prussian Ministry of Education, he accepted a call to the chair of philosophy at the University of Tübingen in 1842 where he continued to give lectures on all philosophic subjects until his retirement in 1875 when he moved to Stuttgart. He died in Stuttgart
on 8 August 1879.

In 1837, Fichte founded the Zeitschrift für Philosophie und speculative Theologie and edited from then on. In 1847, the name was changed to Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik. Publication was suspended 1848–1852, after which Hermann Ulrici and Johann Ulrich Wirth joined him as editors. This journal served as an organ of Fichte's views, especially on the subject of the philosophy of religion, where he was in alliance with C. H. Weisse (with whom he regularly corresponded after 1829);[5] but, whereas Weisse thought that the Hegelian structure was sound in the main, and its imperfections might be mended, Fichte held it to be defective, and spoke of it as a masterpiece of erroneous consistency or consistent error. Fichte's general views on philosophy seem to have changed considerably as he gained in years, and his influence has been impaired by certain inconsistencies and an appearance of eclecticism, which is strengthened by his predominantly historical treatment of systems, his desire to include divergent systems within his own, and his conciliatory tone.[6]

Philosophical work

The great aim of his speculations was to find a philosophic basis for the personality of God, and for his theory on this subject he proposed the term "concrete theism."

Leibniz). He attacks Hegelianism for its pantheism, lowering of human personality, and imperfect recognition of demands of the moral consciousness. God, he says, is to be regarded not as an absolute but as an Infinite Person, whose desire it is that he should realize himself in finite persons. These persons are objects of God's love, and he arranges the world for their good. The direct connecting link between God man is the genius, a higher spiritual individuality existing fan by the side of his lower, earthly individuality. Fichte advocates an ethical theism, and his arguments might be turned to account by the apologist of Christianity. In conception of finite personality he recurs to something like monadism of Leibniz. His insistence on moral experience connected with his insistence on personality.[6]

One of the tests which Fichte discriminates the value of previous systems is adequateness with which they interpret moral experience. The same reason that made him depreciate Hegel made him praise

The regeneration of Christianity, according to Fichte, would consist in its becoming the vital and organizing power in the state, instead of being occupied solely, as heretofore, with the salvation of individuals.

Works

He also edited the complete works and literary correspondence of his father. Some of his works were translated by J. D. Morell under the title of Contributions to Mental Philosophy (1860).[6]

Notes

  1. ^ Kelly Parker, Krzysztof Skowronski (eds.), Josiah Royce for the Twenty-first Century: Historical, Ethical, and Religious Interpretations, Lexington Books, 2012, p. 202.
  2. ^ Michael Heidelberger, Nature from Within: Gustav Theodor Fechner and His Psychophysical Worldview, University of Pittsburgh Press, 2004, p. 38.
  3. ^ Jon Stewart (ed.), A Companion to Kierkegaard, John Wiley & Sons, 2015, p. 68.
  4. ^ "Fichte". Random House Webster's Unabridged Dictionary.
  5. ^ Anatol Schneider, Personalität und Wirklichkeit: nachidealistische Schellingrezeption bei Immanuel Hermann Fichte und Christian Hermann Weisse, Königshausen & Neumann, 2001, pp. 73–4.
  6. ^ a b c d Chisholm 1911.
  7. ^ Immanuel Hermann Fichte Archived 2005-11-09 at the Wayback Machine entry at the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

References

  •  This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domainChisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Fichte, Immanuel Hermann von". Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 10 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 313. This work in turn cites:
  • Rines, George Edwin, ed. (1920). "Fichte, Immanuel Hermann von" . Encyclopedia Americana. This work cites the same sources as the 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica's and in addition:
    • Erdmann, J. E., History of Philosophy (3 vols., London 1890)
  • New International Encyclopedia
    (1st ed.). New York: Dodd, Mead.