Irvin Leigh Matus
Irvin Leigh Matus | |
---|---|
Born | |
Died | 5 January 2011 | (aged 69)
Nationality | American |
Scientific career | |
Fields | William Shakespeare Baseball |
Irvin Leigh Matus (July 25, 1941 – January 5, 2011) was an
Early life
Matus's father was manager of the
Baseball
A keen reader of baseball statistics, in 1978 he published an article anticipating what was later to be known as sabermetric analysis, though Matus would distinguish his own methods from the mechanical computerized techniques of contemporary sabermetrics, an approach he characterizes as "the baseball version of Oxfordianism." The article analysed pitching stats on 162 scorecards for one year, 1976 to examine the view of pitching coaches at the time that 135 pitches (15 per innings) was the average for a complete game. Tom Seaver relied on this standard yardstick in evaluating a pitcher's performance, that he is doing well if he throws about 15 pitches per innings. By a close break-down of statistics, based his analysis on average of 14 pitches per inning after six innings, Matus showed that the contrary was the case, and concluded: "The evidence clearly indicates that, for endurance and effectiveness in any given game, 14 pitches or less per innings as an average is preferable for most pitchers."[6]
At the time of his death, he was working on a comprehensive history of baseball.[7]
Researching Shakespeare
His interest in Shakespeare dated back to high school, though he once confessed that his notion of a good read consisted back then of reading a
Shakespeare, the Living Record
Matus would read the history plays together with biographies of the kings they featured, and discovered, from earlier period tourist brochures, an article by
Almost wholly self-financed, Matus eked out a living by working part-time jobs, while finding accommodation as a house-sitter. In June, 1987, he received a $2,500 grant that allowed him to buy a $650 word processor and begin his writing. Shakespearean scholar Richard Dutton read his manuscript, and submitted it to Macmillan, remarking that:
It's very thorough, archival, back-to-the-grass-roots, trust-nothing, find-the-first-sources scholarship... And so little scholarship is like that. He's done an amazing job of collecting that sort of information.[5]
In the meantime he published an article, "An Early Reference to the Coventry Corpus Christi Pageants in Shakespeare?"[8] suggesting a possible source for Shakespeare's metaphor, in "The Tragedy of King Richard III",[9] of the "worm of conscience" in the Doomsday play of the Drapers' Guild in 1561.[10]
The resulting book, Shakespeare, the Living Record , published by Palgrave Macmillan in 1991, took the form of a travelogue of modern-day England pertaining to persons and places associated with Shakespeare or mentioned in his plays. Stanley Wells thought this 'freelance' contribution sounded 'refreshingly up-to-date'.[11]
The Shakespeare authorship question: Shakespeare, In Fact
In February 1989 he was asked by the Shakespeare Authorship Roundtable to investigate the scholarship of the
Matus then turned to write a comprehensive book on the Shakespearean authorship question. He returned to England in 1993 for another five months, primarily to research in the British Library. In Matus's view, the long history of the debate in public controversy and both amateurish and professional speculation had been usually ignored by scholars. He defended his method by arguing for the following principle:
It is the rule of controversialist scholarship, the error rate of which hovers around 100 percent, that a single flaw in a work of orthodox scholarship, whether perceived or actual—or fabricated—is sufficient in their eyes to cast doubt upon the accuracy and authenticity of the entire work.[15]
He took the "Stratfordian" perspective, advocating the orthodox view that
In Shakespeare, In Fact, Matus examined Oxfordian arguments, presenting both detailed rebuttals of the sceptical perspective and positive evidence for Shakespeare's authorship.
While working on Shakespeare, In Fact Matus also investigated a different authorship question:
Later years
Matus lived in great dignity on an income substantially under $4,000 per annum in his later years. His brilliant conversation, gentleness with fellows and with the creaturely world, and resolute integrity in the face of hard circumstances, is fondly remembered by those who had the opportunity to know him.[25]
Works
Books
- Shakespeare, the Living Record. ISBN 978-0-312-04704-7.
- Shakespeare, In Fact. New York and London: ISBN 978-0-8264-0624-8.
Academic journals
- "Fifteen Pitches per Inning - More or Less?". The Baseball Research Journal. 40. Society for American Baseball Research. 1978.
- "An Early Reference to the Coventry Mystery Plays in Shakespeare?". JSTOR 2870822.
Popular press
- "The Case for Shakespeare: In defense of Shakespeare as the author of the Shakespeare works". ISSN 1072-7825.
- "The Shakespeare Dispute: Matus Replies". ISSN 1072-7825.
- "The Reproof Valiant". ISSN 0017-789X.
Miscellaneous
- "Where The Dream Was Made". Urbanography. 2000.
Notes and references
Notes
- ^ "Matus came from outside the academic Shakespeare establishment and began from a position of agnosticism, but ended up demolishing every pro-Oxford argument."[12]
- ^ Briefly stated, proponents of the Oxfordian theory of Shakespeare authorship believe that Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford is the actual author of Shakespeare's works.
- ^ Matus has also published his contribution to his personal website.[18]
- ^ "To the best of my knowledge, no previous Shakespeare scholar has engaged so much of what Oxfordians have presented as evidence for their positions, or has done so as thoroughly."[20]
References
- ^ Matus 2000.
- ^ Mann 2013, p. 8.
- ^ Phillips & Gross 1989.
- ^ a b Schudel 2011.
- ^ a b c Naughton 1989.
- ^ Matus 1978.
- ^ Mann 2013, pp. 3–4.
- ^ Matus 1989.
- ^ Act 1.Sc.3.222
- ^ Schinkel 2007, p. 114, n. 43.
- ^ Wells 2002, p. 191.
- ^ Bate 2008, p. 366.
- ^ Matus, Irvin. "The Making of a Confirmed Shakespearean"
- ^ Matus, Irvin. "Reflections on the Authorship Controversy (15 Years On)"
- ^ Irvin Leigh Matus, "Comment on reviews on Thomas Mann," The Oxford Guide to Library Research,' at Amazon.com
- ^ The Atlantic 1991.
- ^ Harper's Magazine 1999.
- ^ Matus 1999.
- ^ Matus 1994.
- ^ Pendleton 1994.
- ^ McCrea 2005, p. 225, n.3..
- ^ Shapiro 2010, p. 281.
- ^ Matus 2013.
- ^ MatusTLS 1994, p. 20.
- ^ Mann 2013.
Sources
- "Looking For Shakespeare: Two partisans explain and debate the authorship question". ISSN 1072-7825.
- ISBN 978-0-330-45843-6. Retrieved 28 May 2020.
- Bethell, Tom (October 1991). "The Case for Oxford: Were the works of Shakespeare really written by the Earl of Oxford?". ISSN 1072-7825.
- Matus, Irvin Leigh (October 1991). "The Shakespeare Dispute: Matus Replies". ISSN 1072-7825.
- Matus, Irvin Leigh (October 1991). "The Case for Shakespeare: In defense of Shakespeare as the author of the Shakespeare works". ISSN 1072-7825.
- Bethell, Tom (October 1991). "The Shakespeare Dispute: Bethell Replies". ISSN 1072-7825.
- Dolnick, Edward (October 1991). "The Ghost's Vocabulary: How the computer listens for Shakespeare's "voiceprint"". ISSN 1072-7825.
- Matus, Irvin Leigh (October 1991). "The Shakespeare Dispute: Matus Replies".
- Anderson, Mark K.; Bate, Jonathan; Bethell, Tom; Bloom, Harold; Garber, Marjorie; Matus, Irvin Leigh; Paster, Gail Kern; Sobran, Joseph; Whalen, Richard F.; Wright, Daniel; et al. (April 1999). "The ghost of Shakespeare". ISSN 0017-789X.
- Mann, Thomas (2013). "Introduction to the Dover Edition". In Matus, Irvin Leigh (ed.). Shakespeare, In Fact. Dover books on literature and drama (reprint ed.). Courier Corporation. pp. 1–8. ISBN 978-0-486-32079-3.
- Matus, Irv (1978). "Fifteen Pitches per Inning - More or Less?". The Baseball Research Journal. 40. Society for American Baseball Research.
- Matus, Irvin Leigh (1989). "An Early Reference to the Coventry Mystery Plays in Shakespeare?". JSTOR 2870822.
- Matus, Irvin Leigh (1991). Shakespeare, the Living Record. ISBN 978-0-312-04704-7.
- Matus, Irvin Leigh (1994). Shakespeare, In Fact. New York and London: ISBN 978-0-8264-0624-8.
- Matus, Irvin Leigh (August 5, 1994). "A forced marriage". London: Times Literary Supplement. p. 20.
- Matus, Irvin Leigh (April 1999). "The Reproof Valiant". from the original on 21 February 2014.
- Matus, Irvin Leigh (2000). "Where The Dream Was Made". Urbanography. Archived from the original on 23 August 2000. Retrieved 25 March 2017.
- Matus, Irvin Leigh (2013) [orig. ed. 1994]. Shakespeare, In Fact. Dover books on literature and drama (reprint ed.). Courier Corporation. pp. 1–8. ISBN 978-0-486-32079-3.
- McCrea, Scott (2005). The Case for Shakespeare: The End of the Authorship Question. ISBN 978-0-275-98527-1. Retrieved 20 December 2010.
- Naughton, Jim (5 January 1989). "Irvin Matus And His Solitary Journey; The Itinerant Life of a Driven Shakespearean". The Washington Post. Retrieved 24 March 2017.
- Pendleton, Thomas A. (1994). "Irvin Matus's Shakespeare, IN FACT". Shakespeare Newsletter. 44 (Summer). ISSN 0037-3214.
- Phillips, Christopher; Gross, Ken (22 May 1989). "Left Homeless, Irvin Matus Preferred the Bard to a Bed". ISSN 0093-7673. Retrieved 23 March 2017.
- Schinkel, Anders (2007). Conscience and Conscientious Objections. Pallas Proefschriften Series. ISBN 9789085553915.
- Schudel, Matt (5 March 2011). "A Local Life: Irvin Leigh Matus, 69, penniless Shakespeare scholar who lived by his own design". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 24 March 2017. Retrieved 24 March 2017.
- ISBN 978-1-4165-4162-2. Retrieved 14 January 2011.
- Wells, Stanley (2002). "This Year's Contributions to Shakespeare Studies". Shakespeare Survey. Vol. 45.
External links
- Obituary in the Washington Post
- The Case for Shakespeare from the Atlantic Monthly (online)
- Irvin Leigh Matus Shakespeare website
- Article about Vitagraph Studios