J-integral

Part of a series on
Continuum mechanics
${\displaystyle J=-D{\frac {d\varphi }{dx}}}$ Fick's laws of diffusion
Laws Conservations Mass Momentum Energy Inequalities Clausius–Duhem (entropy)
Solid mechanics Deformation Elasticity linear Plasticity Hooke's law Stress Strain Finite strain Infinitesimal strain Compatibility Bending Contact mechanics frictional Material failure theory Fracture mechanics
Fluid mechanics Fluids Statics · Dynamics Archimedes' principle · Bernoulli's principle Navier–Stokes equations Poiseuille equation · Pascal's law Viscosity (Newtonian · non-Newtonian) Buoyancy · Mixing · Pressure Liquids Adhesion Capillary action Chromatography Cohesion (chemistry) Surface tension Gases Atmosphere Boyle's law Charles's law Combined gas law Fick's law Gay-Lussac's law Graham's law Plasma
Rheology Viscoelasticity Rheometry Rheometer Smart fluids Electrorheological Magnetorheological Ferrofluids
Scientists Bernoulli Boyle Cauchy Charles Euler Fick Gay-Lussac Graham Hooke Newton Navier Noll Pascal Stokes Truesdell
v t e

The J-integral represents a way to calculate the

The quantity J is not path-independent for monotonic mode I and mode II loading of elastic-plastic materials, so only a contour very close to the crack tip gives the energy release rate. Also, Rice showed that J is path-independent in plastic materials when there is no non-proportional loading. Unloading is a special case of this, but non-proportional plastic loading also invalidates the path-independence. Such non-proportional loading is the reason for the path-dependence for the in-plane loading modes on elastic-plastic materials.

Two-dimensional J-integral

The two-dimensional J-integral was originally defined as^[3] (see Figure 1 for an illustration)

${\displaystyle J:=\int _{\Gamma }\left(W~\mathrm {d} x_{2}-\mathbf {t} \cdot {\cfrac {\partial \mathbf {u} }{\partial x_{1}}}~\mathrm {d} s\right)=\int _{\Gamma }\left(W~\mathrm {d} x_{2}-t_{i}\,{\cfrac {\partial u_{i}}{\partial x_{1}}}~\mathrm {d} s\right)}$

where W(x₁,x₂) is the strain energy density, x₁,x₂ are the coordinate directions, t = [σ]n is the

${\displaystyle W=\int _{0}^{[\varepsilon ]}[{\boldsymbol {\sigma }}]:d[{\boldsymbol {\varepsilon }}]~;~~[{\boldsymbol {\varepsilon }}]={\tfrac {1}{2}}\left[{\boldsymbol {\nabla }}\mathbf {u} +({\boldsymbol {\nabla }}\mathbf {u} )^{T}\right]~.}$

The J-integral around a crack tip is frequently expressed in a more general form^{[citation needed]} (and in index notation) as

${\displaystyle J_{i}:=\lim _{\varepsilon \rightarrow 0}\int _{\Gamma _{\varepsilon }}\left(W(\Gamma )n_{i}-n_{j}\sigma _{jk}~{\cfrac {\partial u_{k}(\Gamma ,x_{i})}{\partial x_{i}}}\right)\,d\Gamma }$

where ${\displaystyle J_{i}}$ is the component of the J-integral for crack opening in the ${\displaystyle x_{i}}$ direction and ${\displaystyle \varepsilon }$ is a small region around the crack tip. Using Green's theorem we can show that this integral is zero when the boundary ${\displaystyle \Gamma }$ is closed and encloses a region that contains no

Rice also showed that the value of the J-integral represents the energy release rate for planar crack growth. The J-integral was developed because of the difficulties involved in computing the stress close to a crack in a nonlinear elastic or elastic-plastic material. Rice showed that if monotonic loading was assumed (without any plastic unloading) then the J-integral could be used to compute the energy release rate of plastic materials too.

Proof that the J-integral is zero over a closed path

To show the path independence of the J-integral, we first have to show that the value of ${\displaystyle J}$ is zero over a closed contour in a simply connected domain. Let us just consider the expression for ${\displaystyle J_{1}}$ which is ${\displaystyle J_{1}:=\int _{\Gamma }\left(Wn_{1}-n_{j}\sigma _{jk}~{\cfrac {\partial u_{k}}{\partial x_{1}}}\right)\,d\Gamma }$ We can write this as ${\displaystyle J_{1}=\int _{\Gamma }\left(W\delta _{1j}-\sigma _{jk}~{\cfrac {\partial u_{k}}{\partial x_{1}}}\right)n_{j}\,d\Gamma }$ From Green's theorem (or the two-dimensional divergence theorem) we have ${\displaystyle \int _{\Gamma }f_{j}~n_{j}~d\Gamma =\int _{A}{\cfrac {\partial f_{j}}{\partial x_{j}}}~dA}$ Using this result we can express ${\displaystyle J_{1}}$ as ${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}J_{1}&=\int _{A}{\cfrac {\partial }{\partial x_{j}}}\left(W\delta _{1j}-\sigma _{jk}~{\cfrac {\partial u_{k}}{\partial x_{1}}}\right)dA\\&=\int _{A}\left[{\cfrac {\partial W}{\partial x_{1}}}-{\cfrac {\partial \sigma _{jk}}{\partial x_{j}}}~{\cfrac {\partial u_{k}}{\partial x_{1}}}-\sigma _{jk}~{\cfrac {\partial ^{2}u_{k}}{\partial x_{1}\partial x_{j}}}\right]~dA\end{aligned}}}$ where ${\displaystyle A}$ is the area enclosed by the contour ${\displaystyle \Gamma }$. Now, if there are no body forces present, equilibrium (conservation of linear momentum) requires that ${\displaystyle {\boldsymbol {\nabla }}\cdot {\boldsymbol {\sigma }}=\mathbf {0} \qquad \implies \qquad {\cfrac {\partial \sigma _{jk}}{\partial x_{j}}}=0~.}$ Also, ${\displaystyle [{\boldsymbol {\varepsilon }}]={\tfrac {1}{2}}\left[{\boldsymbol {\nabla }}\mathbf {u} +({\boldsymbol {\nabla }}\mathbf {u} )^{T}\right]\qquad \implies \qquad \varepsilon _{jk}={\tfrac {1}{2}}\left({\cfrac {\partial u_{k}}{\partial x_{j}}}+{\cfrac {\partial u_{j}}{\partial x_{k}}}\right)~.}$ Therefore, ${\displaystyle \sigma _{jk}{\cfrac {\partial \varepsilon _{jk}}{\partial x_{1}}}={\tfrac {1}{2}}\left(\sigma _{jk}{\cfrac {\partial ^{2}u_{k}}{\partial x_{1}\partial x_{j}}}+\sigma _{jk}{\cfrac {\partial ^{2}u_{j}}{\partial x_{1}\partial x_{k}}}\right)}$ From the balance of angular momentum we have ${\displaystyle \sigma _{jk}=\sigma _{kj}}$. Hence, ${\displaystyle \sigma _{jk}{\cfrac {\partial \varepsilon _{jk}}{\partial x_{1}}}=\sigma _{jk}{\cfrac {\partial ^{2}u_{j}}{\partial x_{1}\partial x_{k}}}}$ The J-integral may then be written as ${\displaystyle J_{1}=\int _{A}\left[{\cfrac {\partial W}{\partial x_{1}}}-\sigma _{jk}~{\cfrac {\partial \varepsilon _{jk}}{\partial x_{1}}}\right]~dA}$ Now, for an elastic material the stress can be derived from the stored energy function ${\displaystyle W}$ using ${\displaystyle \sigma _{jk}={\cfrac {\partial W}{\partial \varepsilon _{jk}}}}$ Then, if the elastic modulus tensor is homogeneous, using the chain rule of differentiation, ${\displaystyle \sigma _{jk}~{\cfrac {\partial \varepsilon _{jk}}{\partial x_{1}}}={\cfrac {\partial W}{\partial \varepsilon _{jk}}}~{\cfrac {\partial \varepsilon _{jk}}{\partial x_{1}}}={\cfrac {\partial W}{\partial x_{1}}}}$ Therefore, we have ${\displaystyle J_{1}=0}$ for a closed contour enclosing a simply connected region without any elastic inhomogeneity, such as voids and cracks.

Proof that the J-integral is path-independent

Consider the contour ${\displaystyle \Gamma =\Gamma _{1}+\Gamma ^{+}+\Gamma _{2}+\Gamma ^{-}}$. Since this contour is closed and encloses a simply connected region, the J-integral around the contour is zero, i.e. ${\displaystyle J=J_{(1)}+J^{+}-J_{(2)}-J^{-}=0}$ assuming that counterclockwise integrals around the crack tip have positive sign. Now, since the crack surfaces are parallel to the ${\displaystyle x_{1}}$ axis, the normal component ${\displaystyle n_{1}=0}$ on these surfaces. Also, since the crack surfaces are traction free, ${\displaystyle t_{k}=0}$. Therefore, ${\displaystyle J^{+}=J^{-}=\int _{\Gamma }\left(Wn_{1}-t_{k}~{\cfrac {\partial u_{k}}{\partial x_{1}}}\right)\,d\Gamma =0}$ Therefore, ${\displaystyle J_{(1)}=J_{(2)}}$ and the J-integral is path independent.

J-integral and fracture toughness

For isotropic, perfectly brittle, linear elastic materials, the J-integral can be directly related to the fracture toughness if the crack extends straight ahead with respect to its original orientation.^[6]

For plane strain, under Mode I loading conditions, this relation is

${\displaystyle J_{\rm {Ic}}=G_{\rm {Ic}}=K_{\rm {Ic}}^{2}\left({\frac {1-\nu ^{2}}{E}}\right)}$

where ${\displaystyle G_{\rm {Ic}}}$ is the critical strain energy release rate, ${\displaystyle K_{\rm {Ic}}}$ is the fracture toughness in Mode I loading, ${\displaystyle \nu }$ is the Poisson's ratio, and E is the Young's modulus of the material.

For Mode II loading, the relation between the J-integral and the mode II fracture toughness (${\displaystyle K_{\rm {IIc}}}$) is

${\displaystyle J_{\rm {IIc}}=G_{\rm {IIc}}=K_{\rm {IIc}}^{2}\left[{\frac {1-\nu ^{2}}{E}}\right]}$

For Mode III loading, the relation is

${\displaystyle J_{\rm {IIIc}}=G_{\rm {IIIc}}=K_{\rm {IIIc}}^{2}\left({\frac {1+\nu }{E}}\right)}$

Elastic-plastic materials and the HRR solution

Hutchinson, Rice and Rosengren

where σ is the stress in uniaxial tension, σ_y is a yield stress, ε is the strain, and ε_y = σ_y/E is the corresponding yield strain. The quantity E is the elastic Young's modulus of the material. The model is parametrized by α, a dimensionless constant characteristic of the material, and n, the coefficient of work hardening. This model is applicable only to situations where the stress increases monotonically, the stress components remain approximately in the same ratios as loading progresses (proportional loading), and there is no unloading.

If a far-field tensile stress σ_far is applied to the body shown in the adjacent figure, the J-integral around the path Γ₁ (chosen to be completely inside the elastic zone) is given by

${\displaystyle J_{\Gamma _{1}}=\pi \,(\sigma _{\text{far}})^{2}\,.}$

Since the total integral around the crack vanishes and the contributions along the surface of the crack are zero, we have

${\displaystyle J_{\Gamma _{1}}=-J_{\Gamma _{2}}\,.}$

If the path Γ₂ is chosen such that it is inside the fully plastic domain, Hutchinson showed that

${\displaystyle J_{\Gamma _{2}}=-\alpha \,K^{n+1}\,r^{(n+1)(s-2)+1}\,I}$

where K is a stress amplitude, (r,θ) is a polar coordinate system with origin at the crack tip, s is a constant determined from an asymptotic expansion of the stress field around the crack, and I is a dimensionless integral. The relation between the J-integrals around Γ₁ and Γ₂ leads to the constraint

${\displaystyle s={\frac {2n+1}{n+1}}}$

and an expression for K in terms of the far-field stress

${\displaystyle K=\left({\frac {\beta \,\pi }{\alpha \,I}}\right)^{\frac {1}{n+1}}\,(\sigma _{\text{far}})^{\frac {2}{n+1}}}$

where β = 1 for

These expressions indicate that J can be interpreted as a plastic analog to the stress intensity factor (K) that is used in linear elastic fracture mechanics, i.e., we can use a criterion such as J > J_Ic as a crack growth criterion.

See also

• Fracture toughness
• Toughness
• Fracture mechanics
• Stress intensity factor
• Nature of the slip band local field

References