Jess E. Stephens
Jess E. Stephens | |
---|---|
33rd Los Angeles City Attorney | |
In office January 3, 1921 – June 30, 1929 | |
Preceded by | Charles S. Burnell |
Succeeded by | Erwin P. Werner |
Personal details | |
Born | State Line, Indiana | May 4, 1882
Died | December 2, 1953 Los Angeles, California | (aged 71)
Spouse |
Alice Bernice Cherry
(m. 1907) |
Children | 2 |
Relatives | Albert Lee Stephens Sr. (brother) Albert Lee Stephens Jr. (nephew) |
Jess E. Stephens (May 4, 1882 – December 2, 1953) was an American attorney who was noted for his legal work on behalf of an important traffic tunnel project in that city and for a union railroad station there, as well as his handling of claims against the city after the collapse of the
Personal
Stephens was born May 4, 1882 in
He was married to Alice Bernice Cherry of Iowa and Illinois in the Pico Heights Congregational Church on September 1 or 18, 1907, and they had two children.[1][5][6]
He was a member of the
Stephens died at age 71 on December 2, 1953 in his home at 1416 N. Hayvenhurst Drive,
Vocation
Stephens was admitted to the
For two years he was associated with his brother, Albert Lee Stephens, as a vice president of the California Title Insurance Company, then known as the Title, Abstract & Trust Company.[1]
In 1909 he was appointed deputy
As city attorney, he was notable for:
- His work as counsel in the
- His handling of claims arising from the collapse of the
- The success of a movement compelling railroads serving Los Angeles to build a Union Station in the area of the Plaza.[2][11]
In 1929 he opened his own
In December 1937 he was appointed by Governor
References and notes
- ^ a b c d e f g h Clare Wallace, Los Angeles Public Library reference file, with sources as listed there
- ^ a b c d e f "Jess E. Stephens, Retired Judge, Dies," Los Angeles Times, December 3, 1953, page 5
- ^ "High School Graduates," Los Angeles Herald, February 9, 1900
- ^ "Mrs. Nelson, Sister of Two Judges, Dies," Los Angeles Times, December 3, 1951, page A-7
- ^ "Society: To Wed This Evening," Los Angeles Herald, September 18, 1907
- ^ "Engagement Revealed at Tea," Los Angeles Times, August 15, 1933, page A-5
- ^ "City Club Cheers at Tax Ruling," Los Angeles Times, March 6, 1930, page A-5
- ^ Chronological Record of Los Angeles City Officials 1850–1938, Municipal Reference Library, March 1938, reprinted 1946
- ^ "Promoted, Announces Candidacy," Los Angeles Times, November 19, 1920, page II-1
- ^ "Stephens Honored in Campaign," Los Angeles Times, May 3,1925, page A7
- ^ a b "City Attorney's Office Handles Much Routine," Los Angeles Times, February 10, 1925, page A-6
- ^ "Ventura's Candidates File Names," Los Angeles Times, March 21, 1931, page 6
- ^ "News of Southern Counties: Charter Move Loses Round," Los Angeles Times, April 28, 1931, page A-10
- ^ "Three Named to Superior Court Bench," Los Angeles Times, December 23, 1937
- ^ "Superior Judge Stephens Retires," Los Angeles Times, October 10, 1953, page A-1
Further reading
- [1] An encomium from the Fillmore American newspaper praising the work of "Jess E. Stephens—Lawyer—Man" in handling the demands of the survivors of the Saint Francis Dam disaster
Second Street Tunnel litigation
- [2]"Calls Tunnel Suit Sinister: Public Works Chief Demands to Know Who Backs It; Second-Street Bore Attack Is Hit by Citizens, Improvement Thwarters Are Blamed for New Action," Los Angeles Times, January 21, 1921, page II-12
- [3]"Will Tell City Stand on Tunnel," Los Angeles Times, February 10, 1924, page E-15
- [4]"City Wins Suit on Legality of Tunnel Plans," Los Angeles Times, February 22, 1924, page A-10
- [5]"One Tunnel Case Fails at Capital," Los Angeles Times, February 26, 1924, page A-5
Union Terminal litigation
- [6] "Final Fight Under Way: Union Terminal Case Argued Before Supreme Court Narrowed to Authority of Interstate Body; Resumption of Proceedings Scheduled for Today in Washington," Los Angeles Times, October 29, 1929, page 1
- [7] "Union Station Decision Near: Stephens Thinks Court May Rule Before Christmas; City's Special Attorney Home After Final Argument; Werner Expresses Hope for Favorable Action," Los Angeles Times, November 6, 1929, page A-1
- [8] "Depot Fight End Seen: Counsel of City Pleased; Werner Says Final Outcome Settled Unless Carriers Try to Obstruct; Railway Lawyers Silent on Supreme Court Upholding Contested Order," Los Angeles Times, May 19, 1931, page 1