Linear predictive coding

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Linear predictive coding (LPC) is a method used mostly in

speech in compressed form, using the information of a linear predictive model.[1][2]

LPC is the most widely used method in speech coding and speech synthesis. It is a powerful speech analysis technique, and a useful method for encoding good quality speech at a low bit rate.

Overview

LPC starts with the assumption that a speech signal is produced by a buzzer at the end of a tube (for voiced sounds), with occasional added hissing and popping sounds (for voiceless sounds such as sibilants and plosives). Although apparently crude, this Source–filter model is actually a close approximation of the reality of speech production. The glottis (the space between the vocal folds) produces the buzz, which is characterized by its intensity (loudness) and frequency (pitch). The vocal tract (the throat and mouth) forms the tube, which is characterized by its resonances; these resonances give rise to formants, or enhanced frequency bands in the sound produced. Hisses and pops are generated by the action of the tongue, lips and throat during sibilants and plosives.

LPC analyzes the speech signal by estimating the formants, removing their effects from the speech signal, and estimating the intensity and frequency of the remaining buzz. The process of removing the formants is called inverse filtering, and the remaining signal after the subtraction of the filtered modeled signal is called the residue.

The numbers which describe the intensity and frequency of the buzz, the formants, and the residue signal, can be stored or transmitted somewhere else. LPC synthesizes the speech signal by reversing the process: use the buzz parameters and the residue to create a source signal, use the formants to create a filter (which represents the tube), and run the source through the filter, resulting in speech.

Because speech signals vary with time, this process is done on short chunks of the speech signal, which are called frames; generally, 30 to 50 frames per second give an intelligible speech with good compression.

Early history

Linear prediction (signal estimation) goes back to at least the 1940s when Norbert Wiener developed a mathematical theory for calculating the best filters and predictors for detecting signals hidden in noise.[3][4] Soon after Claude Shannon established a general theory of coding, work on predictive coding was done by C. Chapin Cutler,[5] Bernard M. Oliver[6] and Henry C. Harrison.[7] Peter Elias in 1955 published two papers on predictive coding of signals.[8][9]

Linear predictors were applied to speech analysis independently by Fumitada Itakura of Nagoya University and Shuzo Saito of Nippon Telegraph and Telephone in 1966 and in 1967 by Bishnu S. Atal, Manfred R. Schroeder and John Burg. Itakura and Saito described a statistical approach based on maximum likelihood estimation; Atal and Schroeder described an adaptive linear predictor approach; Burg outlined an approach based on principle of maximum entropy.[4][10][11][12]

In 1969, Itakura and Saito introduced method based on

audio compression format, introduced in 1993.[14] Code-excited linear prediction (CELP) was developed by Schroeder and Atal in 1985.[16]

LPC is the basis for

BBN Technologies started the first developments in packetized speech, which would eventually lead to voice-over-IP technology. In 1973, according to Lincoln Laboratory informal history, the first real-time 2400 bit/s LPC was implemented by Ed Hofstetter. In 1974, the first real-time two-way LPC packet speech communication was accomplished over the ARPANET at 3500 bit/s between Culler-Harrison and Lincoln Laboratory. In 1976, the first LPC conference took place over the ARPANET using the Network Voice Protocol, between Culler-Harrison, ISI, SRI, and LL at 3500 bit/s.[citation needed][clarification needed
]

LPC coefficient representations

LPC is frequently used for transmitting spectral envelope information, and as such it has to be tolerant of transmission errors. Transmission of the filter coefficients directly (see linear prediction for a definition of coefficients) is undesirable, since they are very sensitive to errors. In other words, a very small error can distort the whole spectrum, or worse, a small error might make the prediction filter unstable.

There are more advanced representations such as log area ratios (LAR), line spectral pairs (LSP) decomposition and reflection coefficients. Of these, especially LSP decomposition has gained popularity since it ensures the stability of the predictor, and spectral errors are local for small coefficient deviations.

Applications

LPC is the most widely used method in

digitized, encrypted and sent over a narrow voice channel; an early example of this is the US government's Navajo I
.

LPC synthesis can be used to construct vocoders where musical instruments are used as an excitation signal to the time-varying filter estimated from a singer's speech. This is somewhat popular in electronic music.

notjustmoreidlechatter using linear predictive coding.[18]
A 10th-order LPC was used in the popular 1980s
Speak & Spell
educational toy.

LPC predictors are used in

audio codecs.

LPC has received some attention as a tool for use in the tonal analysis of violins and other stringed musical instruments.[19]

See also

References

  1. .
  2. .
  3. .
  4. ^ a b Y. Sasahira; S. Hashimoto (1995). "Voice pitch changing by Linear Predictive Coding Method to keep the Singer's Personal Timbre" (PDF). {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  5. ^ US 2605361, C. C. Cutler, "Differential quantization of communication signals", published 1952-07-29 
  6. ^ B. M. Oliver (1952). "Efficient coding". 31 (4). Nokia Bell Labs: 724–750. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  7. ^ H. C. Harrison (1952). "Experiments with linear prediction in television". 31. Bell System Technical Journal: 764–783. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  8. ^ P. Elias (1955). "Predictive coding I". IT-1 no. 1. IRE Trans. Inform.Theory: 16–24. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  9. ^ P. Elias (1955). "Predictive coding II". IT-1 no. 1. IRE Trans. Inform. Theory: 24–33. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  10. ^ S. Saito; F. Itakura (Jan 1967). "Theoretical consideration of the statistical optimum recognition of the spectral density of speech". J. Acoust. Soc.Japan. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  11. ^ B.S. Atal; M.R. Schroeder (1967). "Predictive coding of speech". Conf. Communications and Proc. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  12. ^ J.P. Burg (1967). "Maximum Entropy Spectral Analysis". Proceedings of 37th Meeting, Society of Exploration Geophysics, Oklahoma City. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  13. ^ (PDF) from the original on 2022-10-09.
  14. ^ .
  15. .
  16. .
  17. S2CID 212485331. Archived from the original
    (PDF) on 2019-10-18. Retrieved 18 October 2019.
  18. ^ Lansky, Paul. "More Than Idle Chatter". Archived from the original on 2017-12-24. Retrieved 2024-06-02.
  19. ^ Tai, Hwan-Ching; Chung, Dai-Ting (June 14, 2012). "Stradivari Violins Exhibit Formant Frequencies Resembling Vowels Produced by Females". Savart Journal. 1 (2).

Further reading

External links