Ottoman ironclad Hamidiye
Hamidiye in the Golden Horn
| |
Class overview | |
---|---|
Name | Hamidiye class |
Operators | Ottoman Navy |
Preceded by | Mesudiye |
Succeeded by | None |
History | |
Ottoman Empire | |
Name | Hamidiye |
Namesake | Abdul Hamid I |
Ordered | 1871 |
Builder | Imperial Arsenal, Constantinople |
Laid down | December 1874 |
Launched | February 1885 |
Commissioned | 1894 |
Decommissioned | 1903 |
Fate | Broken up, 1913 |
General characteristics | |
Type | Central battery ship |
Displacement | 6,594 metric tons (6,490 long tons) |
Length | |
Beam | 16.9 m (55 ft 5 in) |
Draft | 7.5 m (24 ft 7 in) |
Installed power |
|
Propulsion |
|
Speed | 13 knots (24 km/h; 15 mph) |
Complement | 350 |
Armament |
|
Armor |
|
Hamidiye was a unique
Design
In 1861,
Characteristics
Hamidiye was 87.6 m (287 ft 5 in) long between perpendiculars and 89 m (292 ft) long overall. She had a beam of 16.9 m (55 ft 5 in) and a draft of 7.5 m (24 ft 7 in). Her hull was constructed with iron, and displaced 6,594 metric tons (6,490 long tons) normally. She had a crew of 350 officers and enlisted men as completed.[5][6] The ship was fitted with three pole masts, and the foremast carried a single searchlight. She was equipped with torpedo nets, but the wooden booms were carried aboard the ship, rather than attached to the sides of the hull, and the nets were kept ashore.[7]
The ship was powered by a single horizontal, two-cylinder
Hamidiye was designed to be armed with a main battery of ten 240 mm (9.4 in) 35-caliber breechloading guns manufactured by Krupp in a central casemate, firing through gun ports. These were to be supported by four 150 mm (5.9 in) 35-cal. Krupp breechloading guns and two 57 mm (2.2 in) Hotchkiss guns, the latter for defense against torpedo boats, along with two 450 mm (17.7 in) torpedo tubes. By the time she had been completed, however, she was armed with four 228 mm (9 in) muzzleloading Armstrong guns and ten of the 150 mm Krupp guns. The Armstrong guns were placed in each corner of the casemate, which allowed them a fairly wide arc of fire and limited capability for two of the guns to fire either directly ahead or astern. Six of the 150 mm guns were carried in the casemate on the broadside, three guns per side, and the remaining four were placed on the upper deck, two in the bow and two at the stern. The anti-torpedo boat battery was strengthened with the addition of six 37 mm (1.5 in) guns. The two 450 mm torpedo tubes were retained in deck-mounted launchers.[3][10][9]
The ship was protected with wrought iron armor plate that was manufactured at the Imperial Arsenal where the ship was built. She had a complete armored belt at the waterline, which extended 2 meters (6 ft 2 in) above the waterline and 2 meters (5 ft) below. The belt was 229 millimeters (9 in) thick, and tapered down to 127 mm (5 in) at either end of the ship. The casemate battery was protected with 178 mm (7 in) iron plate. The conning tower also had 178 mm thick sides on 280 mm (11 in) of cypress backing. Hamidiye's armor proved to be poor quality, being described in Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships as "very spongy and flaky".[5][9]
Service history
Hamidiye was ordered from the Imperial Arsenal in 1871, originally under the name Nüsretiye, and was
With the outbreak of the
On 15 April, the British
The condition of the Ottoman fleet could not be concealed from foreign observers. The fleet proved to be an embarrassment for the government and finally forced Sultan Abdul Hamid II to authorize a modernization program, which recommended that the ironclads be modernized in foreign shipyards. German firms, including Krupp,
Notes
Footnotes
- ^ According to a German observer during the Greco-Turkish War of 1897, "when [Hamidiye] was launched...she proved unmanageable; accordingly she was towed back into the arsenal, where she has since spent her life in philosophic contemplation."[16]
Citations
- ^ Lyon, pp. 388–389, 391.
- ^ a b Sturton, p. 152.
- ^ a b c d Langensiepen & Güleryüz, p. 136.
- ^ Dodson, p. 30.
- ^ a b Lyon, p. 390.
- ^ a b Langensiepen & Güleryüz, p. 138.
- ^ Sturton, p. 155.
- ^ Lyon, pp. 391–392.
- ^ a b c d Sturton, p. 154.
- ^ a b Lyon, p. 391.
- ^ Langensiepen & Güleryüz, pp. 136, 198.
- ^ Sturton, pp. 152, 154.
- ^ Sondhaus, p. 112.
- ^ Lyon, p. 32.
- ^ Willmott, p. 35.
- ^ von Strantz, p. 94.
- ^ Lyon, p. 389.
- ^ Langensiepen & Güleryüz, pp. 8, 194.
- ^ Lyon, p. 387.
- ^ Langensiepen & Güleryüz, pp. 8–9.
- ^ Langensiepen & Güleryüz, pp. 9–10, 136.
References
- Dodson, Aidan (2016). The Kaiser's Battlefleet: German Capital Ships 1871–1918. Barnsley: Seaforth Publishing. ISBN 978-1-84832-229-5.
- Langensiepen, Bernd & Güleryüz, Ahmet (1995). The Ottoman Steam Navy 1828–1923. London: Conway Maritime Press. ISBN 978-0-85177-610-1.
- Lyon, Hugh (1979). "Turkey". In Gardiner, Robert (ed.). Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships 1860–1905. London: Conway Maritime Press. pp. 388–394. ISBN 978-0-85177-133-5.
- Sondhaus, Lawrence (2001). Naval Warfare, 1815–1914. London: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-21478-0.
- Sturton, Ian. "Through British Eyes: Constantinople Dockyard, the Ottoman Navy, and the Last Ironclad, 1876–1909". Warship International. 57 (2). Toledo: International Naval Research Organization. ISSN 0043-0374.
- von Strantz, Viktor (1898). The Greco-Turkish War of 1897: From Official Sources. Frederica Bolton (trans.). London: Swan Sonnenschein. OCLC 9545906.
- Willmott, H. P. (2009). The Last Century of Sea Power. Vol. I: From Port Arthur to Chanak, 1894–1922. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. ISBN 978-0-253-35214-9.