Reintegrative shaming

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

In

John Braithwaite at Australian National University in 1989.[1][2][3][4][5] It is related to the emerging perspective of positive criminology, developed by the Israeli criminologist Natti Ronel
and his research team.

An example of reintegrative shaming can be found in the case of United States v. Gementera (2004), wherein a 24-year-old mail thief was sentenced to, among other things, wear a sandwich board sign stating, "I stole mail; this is my punishment", while standing outside of a San Francisco postal facility.[6]

Shaming includes all forms social processes that in different ways have the aim of remorse in the offender. The theory highlights that the shaming is most efficient when coming from people close to the offender, such as friends and family, and not by authorities or officials. The idea is that the shaming is not stigmatized when aimed at the offense itself rather than the characteristics of the offender.[7]

See also

References

  1. ^ "Site locations changed" (PDF).
  2. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2009-08-27. Retrieved 2010-03-07.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  3. .
  4. ^ "Quote of the Day".
  5. ISSN 1089-5701
    .
  6. ^ Gementera, 379 F.3d at 599.
  7. ^ Carrabine, E., Cox, A., Cox, P., Crowhurst, I., Di Ronco, A., Fussey, P., Sergi, A., South, N., Thiel, D & Turton, J. (2020). Criminology: A Sociological Introduction (4th). New York: Routledge. Ch.6 Libris https://libris.kb.se/bib/mzg7l6xqkqdmrqn0