Rhino poaching in Assam
History
Sport hunting became common in the late 1800s and early 1900s.
Poaching for rhinoceros horn became the single most important reason for the decline of the Indian rhino after conservation measures were put in place from the beginning of the 20th century, when legal hunting ended. From 1980 to 1993, 692 rhinos were poached in India. In India's Laokhowa Wildlife Sanctuary 41 rhinos were killed in 1983, virtually the entire population of the sanctuary.[3] By the mid-1990s, poaching had rendered the species extinct there.[4]
Methods of poaching
Five methods of killing rhinos have been recorded:[3]
- Shooting is by far the most common method used; rhino horn traders hire sharpshooters and often supply them with rifles and swords.
- Trapping in a pit depends largely on the terrain and availability of grass to cover it; pits are dug out in such a way that a fallen animal has little room to manoeuvre with its head slightly above the pit, so that it is easy to saw off the horn.
- Electrocuting is used where high voltage powerlines pass through or near a protected area, to which poachers hook a long insulated rod connected to a wire, which is suspended above a rhino path.
- Poisoning by smearing salt licksfrequently used by rhinos.
- With a noose, which cuts through the rhino's skin and kills it by strangulation.
Reasons
Illegal rhino horn trade has been the main problem facing managers of the rhino-protected areas of Assam. According to research by Traffic (conservation programme) and World Wide Fund for Nature, some Vietnamese buyers believe horn to be a cure for cancer when ground to a fine powder. According to a survey conducted by World Wide Fund for Nature in South Africa, it is kept by wealthy people in Vietnam as a "peace of mind" cure.
In 1993, rhino horn was removed from the official lists of
Statistics
The following table shows the numbers of poached rhino in Assam since 1962:[7]
Year | Kaziranga | Manas | Orang | Pobitora | Laokhowa | Other areas in Assam | Year-wise Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1962 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | 1 |
1963 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | 1 |
1964 | 0 | - | - | - | - | - | 0 |
1965 | 18 | 1 | - | - | - | - | 19 |
1966 | 6 | 0 | - | - | - | - | 6 |
1967 | 12 | 0 | - | - | - | - | 12 |
1968 | 9 | 0 | - | - | - | - | 9 |
1969 | 8 | 0 | - | - | - | - | 8 |
1970 | 2 | 0 | - | - | - | - | 2 |
1971 | 8 | 1 | - | - | - | - | 9 |
1972 | 0 | 0 | - | - | - | - | 0 |
1973 | 3 | 0 | - | - | - | - | 3 |
1974 | 3 | 0 | - | - | - | - | 3 |
1975 | 5 | 0 | - | - | - | - | 5 |
1976 | 1 | 4 | - | - | - | - | 5 |
1977 | 0 | 0 | - | - | - | - | 0 |
1978 | 5 | 1 | - | - | - | - | 6 |
1979 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 15 |
1980 | 11 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 18 |
1981 | 24 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 38 |
1982 | 25 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 44 |
1983 | 37 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 41[3] | 7 | 92 |
1984 | 28 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 45 |
1985 | 44 | 1 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 56 |
1986 | 45 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 52 |
1987 | 23 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 43 |
1988 | 24 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 9 | 44 |
1989 | 44 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 64 |
1990 | 35 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 45 |
1991 | 23 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 29 |
1992 | 49 | 11 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 67 |
1993 | 40 | 22 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 68 |
1994 | ? | ? | ? | 4 | ? | ? | 14 |
1995 | ? | ? | ? | 2 | ? | ? | 27 |
1996 | ? | ? | ? | 5 | ? | ? | 26 |
1997 | ? | ? | ? | 3 | ? | ? | 12 |
1998 | 8 | ? | ? | 4 | ? | ? | 12 |
1999 | 4 | ? | ? | 6 | ? | ? | 10 |
2000 | 14 | ? | ? | 2 | ? | ? | 15 |
2001 | 9 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | 10 |
2002 | 5 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | 6 |
2003 | 6 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | 8 |
2004 | 5 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | 5 |
2005 | 12 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | 15 |
2006 | 6 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | 9 |
2007 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | 20 |
2008 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | 16 |
2009 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | 14 |
2010 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | 18 |
2011 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | 8 |
2012 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | 26 |
2013 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | 28 |
2014 | 35 | 3 | ? | ? | ? | ? | 38 |
2015 | 3 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | 3 |
2016 | 19 | 1 | ? | ? | ? | ? | 20 |
Preventive measures taken by Government
Dehorning rhinos
The forest department of Assam took a proposal of dehorning rhinoceres to save it from poachers in February 2014.[8] The Government of Assam also called for public opinion by a committee headed by the Principal Chief Conservator of Forest (Wildlife) could take a decision. Many environmentalists and NGO's opposed the proposal.[9] The proposal was unsuccessful.
See also
- Rhino poaching in Southern Africa
References
- ^ doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2008.RLTS.T19496A8928657.en.)
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link - (PDF) from the original on 9 April 2016. Retrieved 1 June 2013.
- ^ a b c Menon, V. (1996) Under siege: Poaching and protection of Greater One-horned Rhinoceroses in India Archived 30 October 2012 at the Wayback Machine. TRAFFIC India
- ISBN 2-8317-0336-0. Archived(PDF) from the original on 15 July 2011. Retrieved 1 June 2013.
- ^ Pederson, Stephanie. "Continued Poaching Will Result in the Degradation of Fragile Ecosystems". The International. Archived from the original on 28 January 2013. Retrieved 31 January 2013.
- ^ Talukdar, Sushanta (15 March 2014). "'Dehorning not the solution to rhino poaching'". The Hindu. Archived from the original on 15 March 2014. Retrieved 15 March 2014.
- ^ Forest Department of Assam
- ^ "Assam to dehorn rhinos to save them". Archived from the original on 9 May 2015. Retrieved 11 June 2014.
- ^ "Environmentalists oppose Assam govt's move to dehorn rhino". The Times of India. 6 March 2014. Archived from the original on 9 March 2014. Retrieved 11 June 2014.