Ryuichi Sakamoto: Coda
| Ryuichi Sakamoto: Coda | |
|---|---|
| Directed by | Stephen Nomura Schible |
| Produced by |
|
| Cinematography |
|
| Edited by |
|
| Music by | Ryuichi Sakamoto |
Production companies |
|
| Distributed by | Fukushima disaster, and his musical inspirations, including his interest in ambient sounds and film scoring .
Synopsis Ryuichi Sakamoto: Coda chronicles Ryuichi Sakamoto's diagnosis and survival of throat cancer, his heightened anti-nuclear political activism after the Fukushima disaster, and his artistic process. ProductionSchible became interested in Sakamoto when his artistic style shifted following the 2011 Japanese earthquake.[1] The documentary was shot over a five-year span, The documentary features interviews (with Sakamoto as the sole interviewee)[4] as well as select archival clips of his performances and film scores.[6] ReleaseThe film was first released in theaters in South Korea on June 14, 2018. It was released in theaters in the United States on July 6, 2018,[7] and in Japanese theaters on November 4, 2018.[8] The documentary had its world premiere at the 75th Venice International Film Festival,[9][1] where it received highly favorable reviews.[8] It was released for streaming on Mubi on September 7, 2018.[5] ReceptionBox officeRyuichi Sakamoto: Coda grossed $117,460 in the United States with an additional $845,390 in other territories for a total of $962,850 worldwide.[7] During its domestic theatrical run, Ryuichi Sakamoto: Coda was shown in theaters for 179 days, equivalent to 25 weeks. At its peak, the film was screened in nine theaters during the week of August 10–16, 2023. In its opening week, the film made $19,319 from one theater. During its widest release, the per-theater average dropped to $1,389.[7] Internationally, Ryuichi Sakamoto: Coda grossed $721,945 in China, where it ran for 54 weeks. In South Korea, it earned $92,906, with a peak presence in forty-seven theaters and a run time of 28 weeks. In the United Kingdom, the film grossed $15,020, with a peak presence in thirteen theaters and a run time of 26 weeks.[7] Critical receptionOn the weighted average, assigned the film a score of 78 out of 100, based on 13 reviews.[11]
Film critic Peter Bradshaw gave Ryuichi Sakamoto: Coda three out of five.[12] David Stratton, a prominent critic from The Australian, rated the film with a score of three and a half out of five. He deemed the documentary a "useful insight into the work of a major composer" despite its less impressive cinematography.[13] Writing for Variety, Dennis Harvey described the documentary as a "handsome, intriguing if not particularly insightful" portrayal of the composer. He acknowledged the film's meditative pace and attractive cinematography while ultimately suggesting that it "flatters the subject without ultimately quite doing him justice".[2] Ben Kenigsberg's review for The New York Times lauded the documentary as an "uncommonly engaging artist portrait". He highlights the film's ability to immerse viewers in Sakamoto's intellectual and emotional realm, emphasizing the shared excitement in finding the perfect sonic harmony. Kenigsberg also praises the documentary's focus on Sakamoto's performances, applauding Schible's decision to prioritize the music's prominence.[14] David Rooney's of The Hollywood Reporter hailed the film as a "deep dive into the artistry of an original thinker". He described it as a "gentle, reflective portrait" that effectively captures Sakamoto's creative process, despite its lack of personal details. Rooney praised Schible's departure from conventional biographical detail in the documentary, noting its ability to coalesce an expansive view of Sakamoto's eclectic output and artistic process. His review highlighted the film's focus on Sakamoto's synth-pop era and his work on significant film scores, while also commending the inclusion of archival footage and intimate moments in Sakamoto's home studio.[4] Kevin Maher's review in The Times characterized the documentary as "never busy, never intrusive", gracefully maintaining a gentle tempo while remaining "calm, respectful and thoughtful". He rated the film with a score of four out of five.[15] In a less favorable review, Greg Cwik of Slant Magazine gave the film one and a half out of four, and characterized it as "listless". He criticized its execution for relying on "lazy synchronicity" and notes that the documentary feels "artificially intimate", rendering Sakamoto's "genuine spirituality and empathy awkward and disingenuous, as if he’s posturing for the camera". The review highlights the editing as "chicanerous"l particularly in scenes like Sakamoto's homage at a pantheon, where the camera work and cuts create a staged atmosphere. Cwik contrasts it unfavorably with other music documentaries, such as Paul Thomas Anderson’s Junun, citing its lack of vision and spontaneity. Overall, he points out that the documentary fails to enhance the experience of Sakamoto's album "async" or provide meaningful insights into the artist's life and work, ultimately deeming it a wasted opportunity.[16] References
|