Samuel Alexander

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Samuel Alexander
20th-century philosophy
RegionWestern philosophy
School
Main interests
Metaphysics
Notable ideas
Emergent evolution

Samuel Alexander

OM FBA (6 January 1859 – 13 September 1938) was an Australian-born British philosopher. He was the first Jewish fellow of an Oxbridge college.[2] He is now best known as an advocate of emergentism in biology.[3]

Early life

He was born into a Jewish family at 436 George Street, Sydney, Australia, the third son of Samuel Alexander, a prosperous saddler, and Eliza née Sloman. His father died around the time he was born, of tuberculosis. Eliza moved the family to St Kilda, Victoria in 1863 or 1864, and Alexander was tutored, and placed at a private school. In 1871, he was sent to Wesley College, Melbourne, then under the headmastership of Martin Howy Irving.[2][4][5][6]

Alexander matriculated at the University of Melbourne on 22 March 1875. He completed the first two years with distinction, but then left without taking a degree.[2]

Academic career

In May 1877, Alexander sailed for England in an attempt to win a

Freiburg.[2]

Alexander for much of his life was deaf, which acted as a handicap.

Owens College, Manchester in 1893. Among his colleagues there was the educational theorist Catherine Isabella Dodd, whom he admired.[8] Another educationalist he found impressive was Esther Lawrence, a cousin.[9]

Charles Sherrington, who had brought William George Smith as a lecturer to the University of Liverpool in 1905.[11] He invited John Macmurray to be a lecturer in the philosophy department in 1919.[12]

Alexander was president of the

A. N. Whitehead, and mentored others who went on to become major figures in 20th-century British philosophy. One such was John Anderson.[16]

In 1924 Alexander retired from his chair, and was succeeded by John Leofric Stocks.[17]

Awards and honours

He was given the Hon. LLD of St Andrews in 1905, and in later years he received Hon. Litt. D. degrees from Durham, Liverpool, Oxford and Cambridge.[6][13]

In 1924, Alexander sat for the sculptor Jacob Epstein, who made two copies of a bust. One copy went to the Ben Uri Gallery & Museum, and the other to the University of Manchester.[18] He was Herbert Spencer lecturer at Oxford in 1927, and in 1930 the Order of Merit was conferred on him, the first to a native of Australia.[13][5]

Death and legacy

The Samuel Alexander Building at the University of Manchester

Alexander died on 13 September 1938. He was unmarried and his ashes lie in

John Rylands Library.[1]

The building formerly known as Humanities Lime Grove at the University of Manchester was renamed the Samuel Alexander Building, in 2007.[19][20] A theatre at Monash University, Melbourne, is also named for him.[5]

Works

Alexander contributed articles on philosophical subjects to Mind, the Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, and the International

Journal of Ethics. In 1887, he won the Green moral philosophy prize with an essay on the subject "In what direction does Moral Philosophy seem to you to admit or require advance?" It was the basis of his volume Moral Order and Progress, which was published in 1889 and went into its third edition in 1899. Alexander credited A. C. Bradley with introducing him to ethics, and his brother F. H. Bradley helped him with the book. He was influenced by T. H. Green, in whose memory the prize had been set up, but diverged from his views in pursuing evolutionary ethics.[21]

Alexander was appointed Gifford lecturer at Glasgow in 1915, and delivered his lectures in the winters of 1917 and 1918. They drew on preliminary papers he had written from 1908 onwards. These materials he developed into his major work Space, Time, and Deity, published in two volumes in 1920.[2] John Laird called it "the boldest adventure in detailed speculative metaphysics attempted in so grand a manner by any English writer between 1655 and 1920".[22] His Arthur Davis Memorial Lecture on Spinoza and Time, in the nature of an annexe to Space, Time, and Deity, was published in 1921.[2]

In 1933, Alexander published Beauty and Other Forms of Value, mainly an essay in aesthetics. It incorporated passages from papers that had appeared in the previous ten years. Compared to his systematic work, it was rather closer to the mainstream of British thought, and was praised highly by R. G. Collingwood.[2]

Philosophical ideas

Two key concepts for Alexander are those of an "emergent quality" and the idea of emergent evolution:

As existents within

mental life: knowing, freedom, values and the like. In the hierarchy of qualities the next higher quality to the highest attained is deity
. God is the whole universe engaged in process towards the emergence of this new quality, and religion is the sentiment in us that we are drawn towards him, and caught in the movement of the world to a higher level of existence.

His idea was to start with space and time, each of which he regarded as inconceivable without the other, in fact mutually equivalent. His thinking, as he said, originated in Instinct and Experience (1912) by C. Lloyd Morgan; who went on in 1922 to give an exposition of emergent properties.[23] Pure spacetime emerges, through a process Alexander describes simply as "motion", the stuff and matter that make up our material world:

Space-Time, the universe in its primordial form, is the stuff out of which all existents are made. It is Space-Time with the characters which we have found it to reveal to experience. But it has no 'quality' save that of being spatio-temporal or motion.

— Space, Time and Deity [1920] Vol. I, p. 342

Motion is not a succession of point-instants, but rather a point-instant is the limiting case of a motion.

— Space, Time and Deity [1920] Vol. I, p. 321

Point-instants are real but their separateness from one another is conceptual. They are in fact the elements of motion and in their reality are inseparable from the universe of motion; they are elements in a continuum.

— Space, Time and Deity [1920] Vol. I, p. 325

Time makes Space distinct and Space makes Time distinct... Space or Time, may be regarded as supplying the element of diversity to the element of identity supplied by the other.

— Space, Time and Deity [1920] Vol. I, p. 195

Alexander absolutizes spacetime, and even speaks of it as a "Entity|stuff" of which things are made. At the same time he also says that spacetime can be called "Motions" – not motion in the singular, but complexes of motions with kaleidoscopic changes within a continuum. In other words, for Alexander motion is primitive, and space and time are defined through relations between motions.

In Space, Time, and Deity Alexander held that an

object may be before a consciousness, but is not in it; consciousness of an object is not the same as consciousness of one's consciousness of the object. For example, an object such as a chair may be apprehended by a consciousness, but the chair is not located within that consciousness; and, the contemplation of the chair is distinct from thinking about the act of contemplating the chair. Further, since the contemplation of an object is itself an action
, in Alexander's view it cannot be "contemplated", but only subjectively experienced, or "enjoyed".

Alexander asked the question:

How far a science of order could be founded on this bare conception of ordered parts of Space-Time I do not know. But at any rate the more comprehensive theorems of

speculative mathematics
at the present time do not thus proceed. They appear to use the conception of Space and Time not as being stuffs, as we have taken them to be, within which there are relations of the parts of Space and Time themselves, but as relational in the sense that they are relations between things or entities. This is the antithesis between absolute and relational

— Space, Time and Deity [1920] Vol. I, p. 168

Alexander's views have been described as

Family

A change in Alexander's home life occurred in 1902 when the whole of his family—his mother, an aunt, two elder brothers and his sister—came from Australia to live with him.[5] His sister became his hostess and on Wednesday evenings there were informal social gatherings.[6]

Alexander was an "unofficial godfather" to writer

autobiographical work You May Well Ask to Alexander, recounting affectionate anecdotes and quoting extensively from his letters.[25]

Books

  • Moral Order and Progress (1889)
  • Locke (1908), a short study in the Philosophies Ancient and Modern Series.
  • Space, Time, and Deity (1920), Macmillan & Co., reprinted 1966 by Dover Publications, reprinted 2004 by Kessinger Publications: "volume one" :
  • Spinoza and Time (1921)
  • Art and the Material (1925); Adamson Lecture for 1925
  • Beauty and Other Forms of Value (1933)
  • Philosophical and Literary Pieces (1939), (posthumous)

Notes

  1. ^ a b c d "Samuel Alexander" entry by Emily A. E. Thomas in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 13 July 2022
  2. ^ required.)
  3. .
  4. ^ Gavin Budge et al. (editors), The Dictionary of Nineteenth-Century British Philosophers (2002), Thoemmes Press (two volumes), article Alexander, Samuel, p. 10–17.
  5. ^ a b c d e Samuel Alexander (1859–1938). National Centre of Biography, Australian National University. {{cite book}}: |website= ignored (help)
  6. ^ a b c d Serle, Percival (1949). "Alexander, Samuel". Dictionary of Australian Biography. Sydney: Angus & Robertson.
  7. Alumni Oxonienses: the Members of the University of Oxford, 1715–1886. Oxford: Parker and Co – via Wikisource
    .
  8. required.)
  9. required.)
  10. required.)
  11. .
  12. .
  13. ^ a b c "Alexander, Samuel". Who's Who. A & C Black. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
  14. .
  15. ^ Collingwood (1945) – The Idea of Nature – Clarendon Press, Oxford p 158
  16. required.)
  17. required.)
  18. ^ "Professor Samuel Alexander (1859–1938), OM, FBA, Art UK". artuk.org.
  19. ^ "Samuel Alexander Building, History of The University of Manchester". The University of Manchester.
  20. ^ Stuff, Good. "Samuel Alexander Building, Hulme, Manchester". britishlistedbuildings.co.uk.
  21. .
  22. .
  23. .
  24. ^ John W. Cooper Panentheism, the other God of the philosophers: from Plato to the present 2006, pp. 133–134
  25. ^ Naomi Mitchison, You may well ask", London, 1979, Part II, Chapter 1.

External links