Sepik–Ramu languages
![]() | This article should specify the language of its non-English content, using {{langx}}, {{transliteration}} for transliterated languages, and {{IPA}} for phonetic transcriptions, with an appropriate ISO 639 code. Wikipedia's multilingual support templates may also be used. (July 2021) |
Sepik–Ramu | |
---|---|
(obsolete) | |
Geographic distribution | New Guinea |
Linguistic classification | Proposed language family |
Subdivisions |
|
Language codes | |
ISO 639-3 | – |
Glottolog | None |
The Sepik–Ramu languages are an obsolete
Sepik–Ramu would consist of a hundred languages of the
The best known Sepik–Ramu language is
, with about 35,000 speakers apiece.Malcolm Ross and William A. Foley separately re-evaluated the Sepik–Ramu hypothesis in 2005. They both found no evidence that it forms a valid family. However, all of the constituent branches, except for Yuat within Ramu, remain individually valid in his evaluation. Ross links Nor–Pondo to Ramu in a Ramu–Lower Sepik proposal, places Leonhard Schultze (tentatively broken up into Walio and Papi) within an extended Sepik family, and treats Yuat and Taiap as independent families.
Classification
Ethnologue
This list is a mirror of the classification in Ethnologue 15.
- Sepik–Ramu phylum (based on Laycock 1973)
- Taiapisolate
- Leonhard Schultze stock
- Walio family (4 languages)
- Papifamily (2 languages)
- Nor–Pondostock (6 languages)
- Ramu subphylum (37 languages)
- Ramu superstock (29 languages)
- Yuat–Langam superstock (13 languages)
- Mongol–Langam family
- Yuat–Maramba stock
- Marambaisolate (unattested)
- Yuat family
- Sepik subphylum (50 languages) [see subclassification at that article]
Foley (2018)
Uncontroversially coherent subgroups accepted by Foley (2018) are:[2]
|
|
Lexical comparison
Below is a comparison of proto-Ndu, proto-Lower Sepik, and proto-Ottilien reconstructed by and listed in Foley (2005).[3]
gloss proto-Ndu proto-Lower Sepik proto-Ottilien man, person *ntɨw *nor *namot water *ŋkɨw *arɨm fire *ya *awr *s(u)ək sun *ɲa *ra(u) moon *mpapmɨw *m(w)il ? *kər(v)i breast *mɨwɲ *nɨŋgay *mɨr tooth *nɨmpɨy *sisiŋk ? *nda(r) bone *apə *sariŋamp *ɣar tongue *tɨkŋa *minɨŋ *mi(m) eye *mɨyR *tambri *rəmeak nose *tam(w)ə *ŋgum leg *man *namuŋk *or ? ear *wan *kwand- name *cɨ *ɣi pig *mp(w)al *numpran *rəkəm snake *kampwəy *wakɨn *ndop mosquito *kɨvɨy *naŋgun *ŋgit eat *kɨ *am(b) *amb go *yɨ *wa *saŋg come *ya *ya *kɨp sit *rə *sa *mbirak stand *rap(m) *-tik one *nək *mb(w)ia- *kaku two *ri-pa- *mbuniŋ three *-ram
Due to its highly divergent lexicon, Foley does not classify Sepik with Lower Sepik and Ramu.
See also
References
- ^ Laycock, D. C. and Z'graggen, John A. 1975. The Sepik-Ramu Phylum. In Wurm, S.A. (ed.), Papuan Languages and the New Guinea Linguistic Scene, New Guinea Area Languages and Language Study 1, 729-763. Australian National University.
- ISBN 978-3-11-028642-7.
- OCLC 67292782.