Seven Bridges of Königsberg

The Seven Bridges of Königsberg is a historically notable problem in mathematics. Its negative resolution by Leonhard Euler, in 1736,[1] laid the foundations of graph theory and prefigured the idea of topology.[2]
The city of Königsberg in Prussia (now Kaliningrad, Russia) was set on both sides of the Pregel River, and included two large islands—Kneiphof and Lomse—which were connected to each other, and to the two mainland portions of the city, by seven bridges. The problem was to devise a walk through the city that would cross each of those bridges once and only once.
By way of specifying the logical task unambiguously, solutions involving either
- reaching an island or mainland bank other than via one of the bridges, or
- accessing any bridge without crossing to its other end
are explicitly unacceptable.
Euler proved that the problem has no solution. The difficulty he faced was the development of a suitable technique of analysis, and of subsequent tests that established this assertion with mathematical rigor.
Euler's analysis
Euler first pointed out that the choice of route inside each land mass is irrelevant and that the only important feature of a route is the sequence of bridges crossed. This allowed him to reformulate the problem in abstract terms (laying the foundations of
Since only the connection information is relevant, the shape of pictorial representations of a graph may be distorted in any way, without changing the graph itself. Only the number of edges (possibly zero) between each pair of nodes is significant. It does not, for instance, matter whether the edges drawn are straight or curved, or whether one node is to the left or right of another.
Next, Euler observed that (except at the endpoints of the walk), whenever one enters a vertex by a bridge, one leaves the vertex by a bridge. In other words, during any walk in the graph, the number of times one enters a non-terminal vertex equals the number of times one leaves it. Now, if every bridge has been traversed exactly once, it follows that, for each land mass (except for the ones chosen for the start and finish), the number of bridges touching that land mass must be even (half of them, in the particular traversal, will be traversed "toward" the landmass; the other half, "away" from it). However, all four of the land masses in the original problem are touched by an odd number of bridges (one is touched by 5 bridges, and each of the other three is touched by 3). Since, at most, two land masses can serve as the endpoints of a walk, the proposition of a walk traversing each bridge once leads to a contradiction.
In modern language, Euler shows that the possibility of a walk through a graph, traversing each edge exactly once, depends on the
An alternative form of the problem asks for a path that traverses all bridges and also has the same starting and ending point. Such a walk is called an Eulerian circuit or an Euler tour. Such a circuit exists if, and only if, the graph is connected and all nodes have even degree. All Eulerian circuits are also Eulerian paths, but not all Eulerian paths are Eulerian circuits.
Euler's work was presented to the St. Petersburg Academy on 26 August 1735, and published as Solutio problematis ad geometriam situs pertinentis (The solution of a problem relating to the geometry of position) in the journal Commentarii academiae scientiarum Petropolitanae in 1741.
Significance in the history and philosophy of mathematics
In the
Euler's recognition that the key information was the number of bridges and the list of their endpoints (rather than their exact positions) presaged the development of topology. The difference between the actual layout and the graph schematic is a good example of the idea that topology is not concerned with the rigid shape of objects.
Hence, as Euler recognized, the "geometry of position" is not about "measurements and calculations" but about something more general. That called in question the traditional Aristotelian view that mathematics is the "science of quantity". Though that view fits arithmetic and Euclidean geometry, it did not fit topology and the more abstract structural features studied in modern mathematics.[5]
Philosophers have noted that Euler's proof is not about an abstraction or a model of reality, but directly about the real arrangement of bridges. Hence the certainty of mathematical proof can apply directly to reality.[6] The proof is also explanatory, giving insight into why the result must be true.[7]
Present state of the bridges


Two of the seven original bridges did not survive the bombing of Königsberg in World War II. Two others were later demolished and replaced by a highway. The three other bridges remain, although only two of them are from Euler's time (one was rebuilt in 1935).[8] These changes leave five bridges existing at the same sites that were involved in Euler's problem. In terms of graph theory, two of the nodes now have degree 2, and the other two have degree 3. Therefore, an Eulerian path is now possible, but it must begin on one island and end on the other.[9]
The
A popular variant of the puzzle is the Bristol Bridges Walk.[13] Like historical Königsberg, Bristol occupies two river banks and two river islands.[14] However, the configuration of the 45 major bridges in Bristol is such that an Eulerian circuit exists.[15] This cycle has been popularized by a book[15] and news coverage[16][17] and has featured in different charity events.[18]
See also
- Eulerian path
- Five room puzzle
- Glossary of graph theory
- Hamiltonian path
- Icosian game
- Travelling salesman problem
- Three utilities problem
References
- ^ Euler, Leonhard (1741). "Solutio problematis ad geometriam situs pertinentis". Commentarii Academiae Scientiarum Petropolitanae: 128–140. Retrieved 21 September 2024. English translation available at https://www.cantab.net/users/michael.behrend/repubs/maze_maths/pages/euler.html
- S2CID 146875675. Shields provides a discussion of the social significance of Euler's engagement with this popular problem and its significance as an example of (proto-)topological understanding applied to everyday life.
- ^ The Euler Archive, commentary on publication, and original text, in Latin.
- ^ Newman, M. E. J. The structure and function of complex networks (PDF). Department of Physics, University of Michigan.
- ISBN 9781349486182.
- . Retrieved 30 June 2021.
- S2CID 125194454. Retrieved 30 June 2021.
- ^ Taylor, Peter (December 2000). "What Ever Happened to Those Bridges?". Australian Mathematics Trust. Archived from the original on 19 March 2012. Retrieved 11 November 2006.
- ^ Stallmann, Matthias (July 2006). "The 7/5 Bridges of Koenigsberg/Kaliningrad". Retrieved 11 November 2006.
- ^ "About – Mathematics and Statistics – University of Canterbury". math.canterbury.ac.nz. Archived from the original on 28 November 2016. Retrieved 4 November 2010.
- ^ RIT Womens Hockey [@RITWHKY] (19 August 2014). "@OnlyAtRIT do we put the 7 bridge math problem in the cement out front of the new hockey arena @PolisseniCenter #ROC" (Tweet) – via Twitter.
- ^ "The Seven Bridges of Königsberg". Georgia Tech. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
- ISBN 978-0198701811
- ^ AllTrails, Bristol Bridges Walk, Retrieved: 2023-11-22
- ^ ISBN 978-1909446182.
- ^ David Clency (2013, March 1–3) "Bristol's 42 crossings -- Not a bridge too far for maths ace," Bristol Post, pp. 28-29.
- ^ Pamela Parkes (2015, February 3) "Taking on the Bristol Bridges Challenge." Bristol24/7, published online, retrieved: 2023-11-22.
- ^ Andrew McQuarrie (2019, October 2) "This is why people will be paying £1 as they cross bridges in Bristol next week," Bristol Post, pp. 22-23.
External links
- Kaliningrad and the Konigsberg Bridge Problem at Convergence
- Euler's original publication (in Latin)
- The Bridges of Königsberg
- How the bridges of Königsberg help to understand the brain
- Euler's Königsberg's Bridges Problem at Math Dept. Contra Costa College
- Pregel – A Google graphing tool named after this problem
- [1] Present day Graph Problem
- Li, Wenda. The Königsberg Bridge Problem and the Friendship Theorem (Formal Proof Development in Isabelle/HOL, Archive of Formal Proofs)