User contributions for 83.255.43.80
For 83.255.43.80 talk block log logs filter log
27 December 2010
- 22:5222:52, 27 December 2010 diff hist −11 X86 No, not "fully compatible". The point is that the 8086 was fully 16-bit, as opposed to the 8-bit based 8080 which was only partially 16-bit.
22 December 2010
- 21:0321:03, 22 December 2010 diff hist +18 Intel 8086 Why?
- 20:5920:59, 22 December 2010 diff hist +686 Talk:Intel 8086 →What a valid citation looks like
- 13:0513:05, 22 December 2010 diff hist +785 Talk:Intel 8086 →What a valid citation looks like
- 12:1012:10, 22 December 2010 diff hist −8 User talk:83.255.43.80 →Welcome
- 12:0812:08, 22 December 2010 diff hist +571 User talk:83.255.43.80 →Welcome
21 December 2010
- 15:0015:00, 21 December 2010 diff hist +312 Intel 8086 Manual and datasheets seldom have ISBN numbers... but, I have now included some redundant stuff found in the first page of that manual, just to make you happy Wtshymanski... ;)
- 12:2812:28, 21 December 2010 diff hist +92 Intel 8086 Ok... Wtshymanski, we will have to try a compromise - please don't be so contraproductive that you revert this...!
20 December 2010
- 20:3520:35, 20 December 2010 diff hist +84 Intel 8086 YOU look up a "better" (<=>on the net?) reference if YOU are not satisfied... But please stop removing this perfectly ok reference, it's nothing but vandalism.
- 11:0111:01, 20 December 2010 diff hist +157 Intel 8086 Fixing table (N.A columns were used for JMP etc).
30 October 2010
- 17:0017:00, 30 October 2010 diff hist +2 Zilog Z80 fixing link and lessening "recentism"