User talk:JML1148: Difference between revisions
Extended confirmed users 10,228 edits →Your close: new section |
→Engagement in WP:GRAVEDANCING and WP:NPA: new section |
||
Line 275: | Line 275: | ||
Thanks your for your considered close. Per your comments re: AN/I I did take action towards the end of the RfC at AE that resulted in a topic ban from two subjects for the editor you named. I should have handled myself better during the whole episode and I got a warning for my behaviour also. ''[[User:TarnishedPath|<b style="color:#ff0000;">Tar</b><b style="color:#ff7070;">nis</b><b style="color:#ffa0a0;">hed</b><b style="color:#420000;">Path</b>]]''<sup>[[User talk:TarnishedPath|<b style="color:#bd4004;">talk</b>]]</sup> 10:23, 11 March 2024 (UTC) |
Thanks your for your considered close. Per your comments re: AN/I I did take action towards the end of the RfC at AE that resulted in a topic ban from two subjects for the editor you named. I should have handled myself better during the whole episode and I got a warning for my behaviour also. ''[[User:TarnishedPath|<b style="color:#ff0000;">Tar</b><b style="color:#ff7070;">nis</b><b style="color:#ffa0a0;">hed</b><b style="color:#420000;">Path</b>]]''<sup>[[User talk:TarnishedPath|<b style="color:#bd4004;">talk</b>]]</sup> 10:23, 11 March 2024 (UTC) |
||
== Engagement in [[WP:GRAVEDANCING]] and [[WP:NPA]] == |
|||
[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|30px|link=]] You currently appear to be engaged in [[WP:GRAVEDANCING|gravedancing]] according to the comments you made when closing an RfC on the [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Nick_McKenzie&oldid=1213145769| Nick McKenzie talk page]. The basis of this is the idea that the blocked/banned/retired editor [[Wikipedia:OWN|owns]] the content they created, and that this content was invalidated at the same time they were blocked, banned or decided to retire. '''This is incorrect''', since the editor may originally have meant very well, and done good work, before they eventually flamed out. This also seems like a personal attack in violation of [[WP:NPA]]. I'll note that while Mkstokes currently has a [[WP:TBAN|topic ban]], he is ''not'' banned from responding to your accusations, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:MaskedSinger/Archive_2| per comments] provided by uninvolved Administrator @[[User:Ivanvector|Ivanvector]]. You're [[WP:GRAVEDANCING]] violation is detailed, in part below: |
|||
== Examples of gravedancing == |
|||
Examples of gravedancing may include: |
|||
* '''Insults/accusations/other behavior''' directed at editors who are now blocked or banned. This is motivated by the idea that the editor in question won't be able to respond to the comment. This is wrong even if the editor in question never sees it because it contributes to a negative environment that is less likely to encourage editors to work together. |
|||
* '''Behaving as though a consensus is no longer valid''' simply because a blocked or banned editor contributed to it. Whilst consensus can change, the simple act of blocking does not change it - if you wish to overturn the previous consensus then further input should be sought. |
|||
Despite claiming "There is consensus to '''remove''' the disputed content," it is clear none was achieved to remove said content. If it had been obtained, there would be no concern that "This is going to be a controversial closure, given the numerical majority against removing the content." [[User:Mkstokes|Mkstokes]] ([[User talk:Mkstokes|talk]]) 15:53, 11 March 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:53, 11 March 2024
This is JML1148's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
JML1148 uses the Wikibreak Switch template, and plans to update this notice if a wikibreak is taken. |
Question from Sanescious (20:32, 5 March 2024)
Hello I would like to know on how can i add my details as an artist, producer, beat maker and rapper --Sanescious (talk) 20:32, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- @]
- Ok i will wait for your go ahead 41.150.221.213 (talk) 05:56, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Sanescious: I'm not your supervisor. Start whenever you want. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 08:04, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- Ok i will wait for your go ahead 41.150.221.213 (talk) 05:56, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Question from Haspsyokes (11:03, 6 March 2024)
hello, do you know why is it that wikipedia marks words like "honoured" and "sulphur" as incorrect grammer(might be wrong term, I mean the red line underneath the word), and should I replace it with the other spelling of the word? (eg: honored, sulfur) --Haspsyokes (talk) 11:03, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Haspsyokes: Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! 'Honoured' and 'sulphur' are the correct spellings for British or Australian English, whereas 'honored' and 'sulfur' are the correct spellings for American English. I'm assuming your browser or device is set to British English for some reason. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 08:09, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:09, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Question from Irma Fritz (20:00, 7 March 2024)
Hello James! Good to meet you! I'm a fiction writer. Aside from English, I read/write German. I'd like to get started on Wikipedia, perhaps by creating my own Wiki page. --Irma Fritz (talk) 20:00, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- @]
This Month in GLAM: February 2024
|
Stadio Olimpico
Thanks, I wish for it to become a good article but I am aware that the article needs editing by a native speaker who well knows English. -- Blackcat 19:21, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Blackcat: No worries! Just so you know, I probably won't have much time to copyedit the article today, but I'll get to it tomorrow. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 21:14, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
- Ok. Just a thing, in the lead you asked whether 90,000 were the highest attendance for a concert at all, or only for the Olimpico. Of course it's the Olimpico only (Paul McCartney made > 200,000 in Rio de Janeiro in 1990...). I guess I explained it later in the article. -- Blackcat 21:22, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
Your close
Thanks your for your considered close. Per your comments re: AN/I I did take action towards the end of the RfC at AE that resulted in a topic ban from two subjects for the editor you named. I should have handled myself better during the whole episode and I got a warning for my behaviour also. TarnishedPathtalk 10:23, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Engagement in WP:NPA
You currently appear to be engaged in
Examples of gravedancing
Examples of gravedancing may include:
- Insults/accusations/other behavior directed at editors who are now blocked or banned. This is motivated by the idea that the editor in question won't be able to respond to the comment. This is wrong even if the editor in question never sees it because it contributes to a negative environment that is less likely to encourage editors to work together.
- Behaving as though a consensus is no longer valid simply because a blocked or banned editor contributed to it. Whilst consensus can change, the simple act of blocking does not change it - if you wish to overturn the previous consensus then further input should be sought.
Despite claiming "There is consensus to remove the disputed content," it is clear none was achieved to remove said content. If it had been obtained, there would be no concern that "This is going to be a controversial closure, given the numerical majority against removing the content." Mkstokes (talk) 15:53, 11 March 2024 (UTC)