User talk:JML1148/Archive 7

I've rewritten the entry for the Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Center and added few links. The entry is now waiting a review. Could you please do the review? This is a page about the national meteorological and Ukrainian government organization. Sinestro (talk) 14:42, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Sinestro: I have declined your draft, and left a comment there. Please read it. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 02:32, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@JML1148: Thank you for your time.

""" All of the sources appear to be passing mentions. I can't read the Verkhovna Rada source due to language issues, however we do need multiple sources, and all we have now is (possibly) one source.

I'm flabbergasted about this decision.

First of all, Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Center on the citation 3: Ukraine -> Institutional Information -> All Information -> Part 1 (NMS Mandate and Planning) -> 1.1 Title of the National Meteorological or Hydrometeorological Service (NMS): Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Center

https://community.wmo.int/en/members/ukr

World Meteorological Organization (WMO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations. This reference alone should suffice, in my opinion. I decline to accept that Wikipedia doesn't accept UN as a credible source.

I accept that this mention was hard to find. Here, the Ukrainian Hydrometeorological Center is mentioned at the United Nations website:

https://www.unccd.int/resources/knowledge-sharing-system/ukrainian-hydrometeorological-center

Some other references:

https://www.danubecommission.org/dc/en/useful-links/national-meteorological-and-hydrometeorological-services/

https://en.ilmatieteenlaitos.fi/news/5Svxu7C3wDER5Hn41PLF51

https://en.ilmatieteenlaitos.fi/news/2uCmjXgiRsaXf85TCM4Aj9

https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.2022580097

https://mediacenter.org.ua/ukrainian-hydrometeorological-center-increase-in-water-levels-is-possible-in-eastern-regions-of-ukraine-due-to-forecasted-precipitation/

https://news.yahoo.com/scientists-release-forecast-spread-radiation-184300641.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAIT1liIMJ3qyf1MSP262fEsANX1DmgMEc6tbIFYzuZXV6d8p26GJN4yYYaKYSY33msnHd5M863s5FJ5gKZ0KIa3mVMnMoPrAOMahkdHvhMKNFhGw98vHog1LGGvF-mQ9Jv08RKr_UPu0fltWqvgK06xLhPBBZaEkJpj52INmUMY4

https://babel.ua/en/news/90467-the-ukrainian-hydrometeorological-center-warned-of-possible-flooding-in-two-regions-due-to-the-overflow-of-the-desna-river

https://www.saveecobot.com/us/platform/meteo_gov_ua

Looking forward to your reply. Sinestro (talk) 07:28, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@

WP:SIGCOV. I'll have a look at the sources you have provided shortly. JML1148 ^{(talk | contribs)} 07:31, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

@

WP:SIGCOV mostly because they are either passing mentions or are related to the subject - either written by the centre, are reports of which the centre is a source for, or written by partners of it (e.g. the Finnish sources). However, because of the Verkhovna Rada and Earthdoc sources, I'm not to the point that I would accept it, but not to the point that I would decline. I think a more experienced editor would be in a better place to review it. I can advise you to find additional sourcing (preferably news reports) and add it to the article, along with the sources you have linked above. JML1148 ^{(talk | contribs)} 11:10, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

:::@JML1148: thank you for your explanations. I still fail to understand the criteria. Would you consider this source significant, independent, Reliable and secondary?

https://en.defence-ua.com/analysis/weather_factor_in_ukraine_war_how_military_meteorologists_help_the_ukrainian_forces_destroy_russians-5381.html

Why do you consider articles from the Finnish Meteorological Institute a partner? What is the definition of the partnership: apart from having "meteorology" in the name?

Here is my application of the four criteria from

WP:NCORP

:

significant? - yes, it contain significant coverage addressing the subject of the article directly and in depth. There are several articles that talk about UHMC

independent? - yes, it is completely independent of the article subject. it is an independent source, located in another western country, Finland.

Reliable? - yes, it meets the standard for being a reliable source. it is a respected institution, with many articles and mentions online.

secondary - yes, it has no connection to UHMC.

By the same merit, WMO publications also correspond these four criteria. There are a number of the ukrainian sources that talk about Ukrainian Meteorological Center. It is not forbidden to cite non-English articles, but I haven't included them. As a last resort argument, when I open a list of List_of_meteorology_institutions, literally half of them have only one or two references, why apply different standards to this article? I believe it correspond now the minimum criteria, and I'm sure once this article is published it will be improved by other people. Sinestro (talk) 13:41, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Sinestro: If there are Ukrainian sources, certainly add them to the article. I wouldn't be surprised if they are a better quality in terms of independence than the English-language sources. I think you need to expand the article using the sources you have found, and submit it. Regarding other meteorology institutions, there may be some articles that don't meet out notability guidelines. I'll look into that. JML1148 ^{(talk | contribs)} 23:45, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2022 Optus data breach you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2022 Optus data breach for comments about the article, and Talk:2022 Optus data breach/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Vaticidalprophet -- Vaticidalprophet (talk) 18:02, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

Article subject has received two major awards in Australian music (cited) and released many albums (cited by publication). Also holds an academic post. Notability is thereby established I suggest. Walton22 (talk) 02:20, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@

WP:MUSICBIO. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 02:28, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

OK, I'll improve. Give me a few minutes Walton22 (talk) 02:33, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Added more notability to lede. Australian musician collaborating with esteemed USA drummer receives favourable review in UK magazine. Walton22 (talk) 02:41, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@JML1148 OK now? Walton22 (talk) 02:44, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@

WP:GNG requires multiple sources that meet its criteria, of which we have one that is tenuous. It's a review of an album that he created with other people. Ideally, we'd have 2-3 reliable sources that address Barry himself, and not his music. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 02:48, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Ok, I'll improve it. Walton22 (talk) 02:50, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@JML1148 I've added Sydney Morning Herald coverage now. I think that's surely enough! Walton22 (talk) 03:14, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@JML1148 ...and another one Walton22 (talk) 03:23, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Walton22: Thank you for the additional sources. I think there is a pretty good amount of sourcing, however I could see people objecting to that, so I'll leave it to another reviewer to have a look at it. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 03:25, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Walton22: I'm not sure what's objectionable still. Tbh, I can't credit "Ideally, we'd have 2-3 reliable sources that address Barry himself, and not his music." Why not his music? Details of his personal life are surely not required? I can't see that a review in Jazzwise magazine is "tenuous' (read their WP entry) and I fail to see why "created with other people" is a downside, particularly when they're notable themselves as in Eric Harland. Walton22 (talk) 03:31, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@

WP:SIGCOV) and the others are reviews that give no biographical detail. The SMH review is also pretty short. I am unsure, so I am handing it to another reviewer. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 03:45, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

@JML1148 Ok, thanks for clarifying. I have added an external link to independent biography. Walton22 (talk) 03:56, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@JML1148, note there is also a biography at his cited University of Sydney staff profile Walton22 (talk) 04:01, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at

Hello JML1148,

Backlog

Redirect drive: In response to an unusually high redirect backlog, we held a redirect backlog drive in May. The drive completed with 23851 reviews done in total, bringing the redirect backlog to 0 (momentarily). Congratulations to Hey man im josh who led with a staggering 4316 points, followed by Meena and Greyzxq with 2868 and 2546 points respectively. See this page for more details. The redirect queue is steadily rising again and is steadily approaching 4,000. Please continue to help out, even if it's only for a few or even one review a day.

Redirect autopatrol: All administrators without autopatrol have now been added to the redirect autopatrol list. If you see any users who consistently create significant amounts of good quality redirects, consider requesting redirect autopatrol for them here.

WMF work on PageTriage: The

WT:NPPR

when we are ready for beta testers.

Articles for Creation (AFC): All new page reviewers are now automatically approved for Articles for Creation draft reviewing (you do not need to apply at

AFC helper script, visit Special:Preferences, visit the Gadgets tab, tick "Yet Another AFC Helper Script", then click "Save". To find drafts to review, visit Special:NewPagesFeed

, and at the top left, tick "Articles for Creation". To review a draft, visit a submitted draft, click on the "More" menu, then click "Review (AFCH)". You can also comment on and submit drafts that are unsubmitted using the script.

You can review the AFC workflow at

draftspace is optional

, so moves of drafts to mainspace (even if they are not ready) should not be reverted, except possibly if there is conflict of interest.

Pro tip: Did you know that visual artists such as painters have their own

WP:ARTIST

4b (solo exhibition, not group exhibition, at a major museum) or 4d (being represented within the permanent collections of two museums).

Reminders

• Newsletter feedback - please take this
  short poll
  about the newsletter.
• There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord and #wikimedia-npp ^connect on IRC.
• Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

A little commentary re: a comment you made at ANI.

In my opinion, the people who really do the concept of fraternities right are the historically Black fraternities and sororities, particularly the sororities. Most "mainline" fraternity members don't stay very active or connected to their organizations after graduating, but members of the historically Black organizations do, which leads them to have a network available in the post-college years. In the lead-up to the inauguration of Joe Biden, media coverage mentioned that Kamala Harris is a member of Alpha Kappa Alpha.

I went to a professional development workshop a few years ago. The non-Black women did not really talk about whether they had joined sororities in college; the Black women did. It was instant bonding for the women who were members of the same sorority; if they were from different sororities, there was occasionally friendly rivalry, but really it was still mutual respect and being part of the overall organization.

And that's why I say they do it right: they embody being not just social organizations for the college years but service organizations for the college years and beyond. —C.Fred (talk) 11:36, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello JML1148,

The

New Page Patrol team is sending you this impromptu message to inform you of a steeply rising backlog of articles needing review. If you have any extra time to spare, please consider reviewing one or two articles each day to help lower the backlog. You can start reviewing by visiting Special:NewPagesFeed

. Thank you very much for your help.

Reminders:

• There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
• Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery at 06:58, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2023).

Administrator changes

Novem Linguae

• Deckiller
• Electionworld
• MBisanz
• Penwhale
• Raul654
• Roadrunner
• Viridae
• Yannismarou

Bureaucrat changes

MBisanz

Guideline and policy news

• Contributions to the English Wikipedia are now released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) license instead of CC BY-SA 3.0. Contributions are still also released under the GFDL license.

Technical news

• Discussion is open regarding a proposed global policy regarding third-party resources. Third-party resources are computer resources that reside outside of Wikimedia production websites.

Arbitration

• Two arbitration cases are currently open. Proposed decisions are expected 5 July 2023 for the Scottywong case and 9 July 2023 for the AlisonW case.

Hi James, FB has just given me another group of paid editors:-( if you want to take a look it's https://www.facebook.com/groups/wikipediapagescreator/?ref=share Neil Back ache (talk) 17:34, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Back ache: Interesting. I'll have a look into it. JML1148 ^{(talk | contribs)} 23:02, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh... the group is join by request and the rules are in Hindi, so I don't think I'll be able to join. JML1148 ^{(talk | contribs)} 23:04, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't even look at the rules, I just applied and they let me in, it's only when I got in did I realise it's nature Back ache (talk) 23:14, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I'll make a request then. 23:15, 7 July 2023 (UTC) JML1148 ^{(talk | contribs)} 23:15, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The third round of the 2023 WikiCup has come to an end. The 16 users who made it to the fourth round had at least 175 points. Our top scorers in round 3 were:

• Thebiguglyalien, with 919 points from a featured article on Frances Cleveland as well as five good articles and many reviews,
• Unlimitedlead, with 862 points from a high-scoring featured articles on Henry II of England and numerous reviews,
• Iazyges, with 560 points from a high-scoring featured article on Tiberius III.

Contestants achieved 11 featured articles, 2 featured lists, 47 good articles, 72 featured or good article reviews, over 100 DYKs and 40 ITN appearances. As always, any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
425		Loudoun County, Virginia (talk)	Add sources
99		Ramna Park (talk)	Add sources
246		The Coasters (talk)	Add sources
349		Optus (talk)	Add sources
10		Netherlands Cancer Institute (talk)	Add sources
11		Anew Revolution (talk)	Add sources
252		South Asian University (talk)	Cleanup
139		Cozy Bear (talk)	Cleanup
130		Graphic arts (talk)	Cleanup
37		Cardiac rehabilitation (talk)	Expand
2,181		Computer security (talk)	Expand
13		Ivanti Pulse Connect Secure data breach (talk)	Expand
24		Timeline of Internet conflicts (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
403		Cyberattack (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
89		Backyard cricket (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
138		Kolhapur district (talk)	Merge
22		Pakistan Junior League (talk)	Merge
663		Camping (talk)	Merge
79		Sleipnir (web browser) (talk)	Wikify
191		Supply chain attack (talk)	Wikify
181		2020 United States federal government data breach (talk)	Wikify
2		Ivo Mršnik (talk)	Orphan
1		Pozohondo (Vino de la Tierra) (talk)	Orphan
6		MedAccess (talk)	Orphan
4		Newsrail (talk)	Stub
5		Xiang Gao (talk)	Stub
17		Raz Hershko (talk)	Stub
27		Shahameh Dizaei (talk)	Stub
11		Saint Petersburg State University of Engineering and Economics (talk)	Stub
25		Inbar Lanir (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:23, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in GLAM – Volume XIII, Issue VI, June 2023 Headlines Albania report: CEE Spring Campaign 2023, Albania and Kosovo Asia report: Donation of images from the National Centre for Biological Sciences Brazil report: Native Brazilian photographer wins Wiki Loves Folklore Brazil 2023 Croatia report: Half done in 2023 Germany report: Museum tour, WLM, handouts and image donation India report: Wiki Exploration Programme GLAM activities Indonesia report: Conclusion of Mini Grants; Second #1Lib1Ref Campaign; Wikisource Workshop in Bali Italy report: TCI and Turin Academy of Science Kosovo report: CEE Spring Campaign 2023, Albania and Kosovo Netherlands report: A new book, new Wikipedia articles, videos and further images on Africa New Zealand report: Report on the Society for the Preservation of Natural History Collections Conference 2023 and Auckland suburb updates Philippines report: GLAM outreach activity at University of Nueva Caceres: Digitization, workshops and proofread-a-thons as future collaboration Poland report: GLAM-Wiki workshops for the Czartoryski Library; Work on the GLAM-Wiki Project Page Continues; End of Internship within the "Praktykuj w Kulturze" Program Sweden report: Knowledge overview; Almedalen week Switzerland report: Swiss GLAM Programm UK report: Cultural diversity USA report: WikiWednesday returns to Manhattan; Wikimedia NYC and Art+Feminism; WikiConference North America 2023; GLAM Wiki 2023 Special story: Flickr Foundation and Wikimedia Foundation partner to build Flickypedia GLAM Wiki conference report: The call for proposals is now open for the GLAM Wiki Conference Calendar: July's GLAM events Read this edition in full • Single-page To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Hello --139047T (talk) 19:36, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@139047T: Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Do you have a question? JML1148 ^{(talk | contribs)} 07:45, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at

On 16 July 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2022 Optus data breach, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 2022 Optus data breach affected over a third of Australians? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2022 Optus data breach. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 2022 Optus data breach), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Kusma (talk) 00:03, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at

Hello My Uncle just turned 100 years old on December 17. 2022 he was a Marine who was in Okinawa in 1945 --Vince45blue (talk) 03:38, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Vince45blue: Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I am assuming you want to add your uncle to List of last surviving World War II veterans. To do so, you'll have to have a reliable source, such as a newspaper mention, supporting your claim. From looking at the page, your uncle will need a "claim to fame", like the ones in the "Notability" section of the list. JML1148 ^{(talk | contribs)} 04:10, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You recently closed this RfC about using the 5% rule. The question was specifically about using it for parliamentary elections (rather than presidential elections, which there is consensus for). Would you be able to clarify your close to expressly point out it applies to parliamentary elections only, rather than undoing a previous consensus for its use in presidential elections. Cheers, Number 57 12:47, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Number 57:  Done! Thanks for bringing this to my attention. JML1148 ^{(talk | contribs)} 03:32, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am Eddi Ameur inventor of the Orchid Potato Fries.

I quite overwhelmed by the processing to create a new article about my product. It definitely doesn't exist anywhere in the world.

Could I inquire your assistance?

Thanks --ShaEddi (talk) 03:18, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@

spam. THis is the main reason that your first draft on your user page was speedily deleted. JML1148 ^{(talk | contribs)} 03:38, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello - I have expanded this article and added 11 reliable sources. Please review your vote at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isn't It Now?. Thanks! --BRIAN0918 16:35, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Brian0918: I've changed my !vote to keep. Thanks for the heads up. JML1148 ^{(talk | contribs)} 04:38, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Post-block_conduct_at_User_talk:Jack4576 LibStar (talk) 04:04, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@LibStar: Very interesting (and also somewhat sad) read. Thanks for the heads up. I had hoped that MaxnaCarta would be able to finally turn around Jack's disruptive conduct, but to see them denounce him in such strong terms is sad. JML1148 ^{(talk | contribs)} 04:29, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here .
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]