User talk:JML1148/Archive 1

Hello, I'm

]

JML1148, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi JML1148! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject

independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Hilton Worldwide

. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Hilton Properties in Australia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of Hilton Properties in Australia, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 02:55, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Hello, JML1148. It has been over six months since you last edited the

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:57, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello JML1148,

You said feedback is welcome so here is a little.

You smoothed some of my writing.

But in https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Electricity_sector_in_Turkey&type=revision&diff=1088869262&oldid=1088831348 I put back in some meaning and links that you had removed or changed, perhaps accidentally. For example Shura is not proposing to get all diesel trucks off the road - just old ones, 45% is all industry not just major industry, "half as much" is very different from "half as much again", "electricity" is only part of "energy" so the proportion is important enough to be in the lead.

I don't expect copyeditors to be subject experts but if you don't understand something it is likely the general reader will also be confused (many people confuse electricity and energy I suspect) so I would rather you asked (for example by tagging "clarify") than guessed. In that way rather than just changing some things back to the previous, as I did in the above edit, I could perhaps rewrite the confusing bit by making it longer if I understood how it confused you as a general reader.

Anyway now I have reverted a bit it is better than before you started so thanks for your work.

Chidgk1 (talk) 15:41, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Chidgk1 Thanks for letting me know, I didn't realise that! JML1148 (talk) 07:47, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Long Articles, 5th Place
		This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to JML1148 for copyediting 2 long articles during the GOCE May 2022 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Miniapolis 02:09, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		The (old school) League of Copy Editors Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to JML1148 for copy edits totaling over 30,000 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE May 2022 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Miniapolis 02:09, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors June 2022 Newsletter Hello and welcome to the June 2022 newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since April 2022. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. Blitz: of the 16 editors who signed up for our April Copy Editing Blitz, 12 completed at least one copy-edit, and between them removed 21 articles from the copy-editing backlog. Barnstars awarded are here. Drive: 27 editors signed up for our May Backlog Elimination Drive; of these, 20 copy-edited at least one article. 144 articles were copy-edited, and 88 articles from our target months August and September 2021 were removed from the backlog. Barnstars awarded are here. Blitz: our requests from March, April and May 2022. Barnstars awarded will be posted here . Progress report: As of 07:12, 14 June 2022 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have completed 209 requests since 1 January and the backlog stands at 1,404 articles. Election news: Nominations for our half-yearly Election of Coordinators continues until 23:50 on 15 June (UTC), after which, voting will commence until 23:59, 30 June (UTC). All Wikipedians in good standing (active and not blocked, banned, or under ArbCom or community sanctions) are eligible and self-nominations are welcomed. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Reidgreg, Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Tenryuu To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		The Modest Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to JML1148 for copy edits totaling over 2,000 words (including rollover words) during the GOCE June 2022 Copy Editing Blitz. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki (talk) 01:17, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You just accused me of writing something without citing sources, you didn't mention which article you were talking about so i'm unable to tell which article i need to add sources for 180.150.38.159 (talk) 00:22, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Did it work out well for the greeks to throw the Persian messenger into the well and get Darius' wrath? Also, do you have a problem with my edits of Islamic invasion of Persia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.150.38.159 (talk) 06:46, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have no problem with any other edits: they have been handled by other editors. Because the phrase could be challenged (as it could be interpreted as an opinion) it must be cited: please read Wikipedia:Citing sources. JML1148 (talk) 06:55, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Total Articles, 5th Place
		This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to JML1148 for copyediting 5 articles during the GOCE July 2022 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Miniapolis 23:02, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Old Articles, 4th Place
		This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to JML1148 for copyediting two old articles during the GOCE July 2022 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Miniapolis 23:02, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		The Cleanup Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to JML1148 for copy edits totaling over 12,000 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE July 2022 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Miniapolis 23:02, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JML1148. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or RedWarn.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! FASTILY 08:25, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have reverted my edits on Hussainabad, jharkhand wikipedia page.The information I added is actually dont have any source.I am local of this region and have reviewed almost 1000 people before editing. So what can you say about this. Local people all over the region want to add this content to wikipedia. I am DR ROBERT PINSKY INDIA DR ROBERT PINSKY INDIA (talk) 14:31, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Providing a

reliable source is an essential part of adding information to articles. Wikipedia doesn't recognize first-hand accounts or original research as reliable sources. Sorry. _signed, Willondon (talk) 14:37, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Thank you, kind talk page stalker! JML1148 (talk) 06:22, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		The Modest Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to JML1148 for copy edits totaling over 2,000 words (including rollover words) during the GOCE August 2022 Copy Editing Blitz. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki (talk) 05:47, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

Femke (talk) 16:24, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JML1148. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 22:21, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Knightmare_3112#Katherine_Deves_rating%3F

Very close - but...

The article is just too general in the info box, lead sentence and lead paragraph.

Always better to contextualise - where in oz, in the info box as well - clarify place of birth, living and if you are about to do NPP - one constant issue is the lack of specific where? in many articles. The separation of a clarifying lead sentence and lead para is the difference between articles of quality and acceptability and those that dont always get there, so to speak.JarrahTree 10:53, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@JarrahTree: Are you intending this for Knightmare 3112 or me? I asked them why he rated it that way, and they only responded with the fact that it was short. Anyway, I will try to make those fixes, however I couldn't find anything reliable about birth date besides her age. Thanks, JML1148 (Talk | Contribs) 11:43, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I can see why you are asking, I was thinking you were working more on the article... I think sydney/nsw/ could be in the info box and the lead - so dont worry about birth date that much. I had gone to knightmare's talk page to thank for a lot of tasmanian material edits - but hey, the suggestion is offered, no big deal - I had gone to look at compatriots articles - all very similar, with not very clear lead sentences or paragraphs, maybe its a fashion in australian politicians articles that I have missed somehow... JarrahTree 11:51, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at

@JML1148 thanks for your ongoing copy edit support to the article Religious education in Kerala . One of the clarification sought by you is '.. What is 'tenth standard'? ..' in sentence ".. Nambudiri says Vidyapeedam admits only ten tenth standard passed boys ..' . Here, in context of South Asia, it means Secondary School Certificate i.e. successful completions 10 years of formal school education. (Pre primary education is not counted).

Your other queries are about role of Buddhism in Kerala education and I will need to seek help from other Kerala users for that and it may take some time.

Meanwhile, you being experienced editor, I am looking for, requesting, some more help, if you can support in improving one more Kerala article

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku (talk) 09:03, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Bookku:I have made those changes by linking the related article (Secondary School Certificate) to it, making it clear to readers if they want to know what the article is referring to. I may have a look at your draft article if I have time, in the meantime, I can notice that your draft has too many 'According to' sentences, which in some cases are not needed. Trying to add more facts to the draft rather than people's opinions is my main piece of advice here. Thanks, JML1148 (Talk | Contribs) 09:22, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol | October 2022 backlog drive
On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive. Barnstars will also be awarded for re-reviewing articles. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 21:16, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ the article Religious education in Kerala I removed 1 draft stage sentence (relating to coeducation) for which having one more source providing more context about student age would have been helpful.

If we do not mention, some moderates may say you take note of gender segregation controversy but do not mention side of one coeducational school. And if we provide info still some conservatives may have objection saying your (Wikipedia) article does not provide age of students in co education. In that context I preferred to have one more source which would have provided more context to coeducational school. As of now I have removed the sentence.

I will look into other clarification points by referring to the cited book as I get free and focus on. Many thanks for your copy edit support to the article.

Bookku (talk) 10:07, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Bookku: If it is not properly sourced, you do not need to mention it. Don't let politics get into Wikipedia, honestly, the age of girls does not matter. JML1148 (Talk | Contribs) 11:11, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The source seems reliable still seems to have few discrepancies. For example '.. had madrasas affiliated with the board, including 9636 lower primary, .." This discrepancy is in the source itself.

The source says 'Madrasa is co educational' in single sentence statement. Even with relative reliability of the source I would prefer one more corroboration source. It is not about we getting political but about we being careful enough while weighing the sources. So in any case I removed the sentence to be on more careful side as of now. We can add info about co education after confirming with other sources and other Malayalam Wikipedians.

Pl. let me know how to handle 9636 figure discrepancy which is there in the source itself.

Thanks for your valuable inputs. Bookku (talk) 11:26, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Staff

You sought clarification on 'boards own staff' composition sentence. 'boards own staff' means they are not the staff of the affiliate Madrasas.

Source is not clear about location of 141 staff members (my guess: likely to be headquarter and branch offices if any) , simply mentions as ".. 141 officials employed under the board ..".

Teachers of affiliate Madrasas are paid by local village communities; but 141 officials are likely to be paid by the board. Source also mentions some pension being paid to the retired teachers by the board but source is not clear enough so pension related info is avoided in our article.

Bookku (talk) 12:30, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy birthday! Hi JML1148! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy birthday! Enjoy this special day! CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 09:36, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Forgot I signed up to this! Thank you for the message! JML1148 (Talk | Contribs) 11:03, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at

You are receiving this message because you signed up to participate in the drive, but have not yet reviewed any pages in October. We would love to see you over at the backlog drive! Buidhe 10:49, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to, but I am still waiting for a decision to become a New Page Reviewer after my probation period ended. JML1148 (Talk | Contribs) 05:55, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		The Modest Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to JML1148 for copy edits totaling over 4,000 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE September 2022 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Miniapolis 19:13, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]