User talk:All in

Hi, just wanted to thank you for voting on my RFA, which went through with a count of (58/0/1), far better than I'd expected. I intend to take things slowly and start using the extra abilities gradually, but if there's anything I can do just leave a message. Cheers, CTOAGN (talk) 13:54, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support on my request for adminship. It ultimately succeeded with votes of 52/1/2, so I am now an administrator. Should you have any questions, comments, complaints, or requests at any point in the future, please do not hesitate to let me know on my talk page or via e-mail.

I want to sincerely thank you for voting on my adminship nomination. Whenever I mess up, please let me know. I want to learn from my mistakes so they don't become patterns.

]

My RfA

Thank you Hello All in, and thank you for your support in my request for adminship! It passed with a final count of 63/4/3. I am honoured by the community support and pledge to serve the project as best as I can. CanadianCaesar The Republic Restored 17:11, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for supporting my RfA. It was successful and I hope to be a good administrator. Essexmutant 11:48, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking the time to vote in my

Hello All in, thank you for you support in my RfA. I was promoted with a final count of 48/1/0! If you see me making any mistakes, let me know ASAP. -- WB 02:40, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Hello All in, and thank you for your support in my request for adminship! It passed with a final count of 98/2/0. If there is anything I can do to help you, please leave me a message on my talk page! -- xaosflux Talk

Thank you very much for your support during my recent Admin election, I appreciate the trust that you have put in me. Please contact me if you have any questions, comments or concerns regarding my work as an admin.

Kind Regards, Elf-friend 08:35, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for voting! Although this is a bit late in coming, I want to thank you for voting (no matter what your vote was) in my recent request for adminship. You might be aware that it did not pass due to a lack of consensus. The final tally was 21/9/10. I think I will try again this spring or summer after I have gained a bit more experience and met a few more fellow editors. Thanks again!

--MatthewUND^(talk) 05:34, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thanks for your support in my request for adminship (did you know that "adminiship" is not an English word? Unbelievable!). It ended with a tally of (51/0/0). As an administrator, I hope to better help this project and its participants: if you have any question or request, please let me know. - Liberatore(T) 12:43, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your support in my RFA. The final vote count was (66/2/3), so I am now an administrator. Please let me know if at any stage you need help, or if you have comments on how I am doing as an admin. Have a nice day! Stifle 17:02, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply ]

One of the IPs you use is heavily used by vandals to create sockpuppets and generally cause trouble. You're the only nonvandal user of this IP. Could we talk about this more in private? Kelly Martin (talk) 06:35, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, first, I have CheckUser rights on enwiki, which allows me to find out what IP addresses an editor is using; second, you revealed your IP address higher up on your talk page. We don't do this casually; I happened across this situation while investigating a mass vandal. I am contacting you because I don't think you're a mass vandal, but I'd like to block the IP in question permanently without interfering with your ability to edit. Please email me at [1]; I promise to keep your contact information confidential. Kelly Martin (talk) 15:09, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your vote of confidence in my recent request for bureaucratship. Even though it didn't pass, I greatly appreciate your support and hope I will continue to have your respect. Thank you! Flcelloguy (A note?) 22:54, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, All in, for voting in my RFA. It closed with a final result of 75/1/0. Now that I am an administrator here, I will continue to improve this encyclopedia, using my new tools to revert vandalism, block persistent vandals, protect pages that have been vandalized intensively, and close AFD discussions. Any questions? Please contact me by adding a new section on my talk page. Again, thanks to all of you who participated!!! -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:24, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The count is in, and now I join the crew who wield the mops and pails. Thanks for your support! I pledge to serve both you and Jimbo Wales. If you have anything you need, then please don't think to hesitate. For I am the very model of a grateful admin designate! ♫Bucketsofg✐♪

I wanted to drop a brief note on your talk page (one admittedly not written to you only, but nevertheless truly meant) to thank you for your vote in my Request for Adminship, which concluded this evening. Even though it was unsuccessful, it did make clear to me some areas in which I can improve my contributions to Wikipedia, both in terms of the areas in which I can participate and the manner in which I can participate. I do plan on, at some point in the future (although, I think, not the near future), attempting the process again, and I hope you will consider participating in that voting process as well. If you wish in the future to offer any constructive criticism to me, or if I may assist you with anything, I hope you will not hesitate to contact me. Thanks again. —

Thanks for commenting on my RfA...it was greatly appreciated! --Osbus 21:27, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, several months ago, you wrote me, that the Ruge Admin might delete my userboxes. I still don't understand what the Rouge admins are, or how to subst. my userboxes. Yes, I might be stupid, but there are one million guideline pages, I'll stop being a newbie in 2067 or so. Maybe you could help? Thanks! Monoblonde 13:03, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I need you to message me as soon as possible concerning edits to our Challeneges. We have a friggin asshole by nature suggesting that its by race.70.185.125.101 19:33, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

you fucked up the thing by posting fake info. those are NOT the RR14 people...74.195.3.199 04:58, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I see you have modified Image:Cfdia.PNG in the past. Some anonymous editors are upset that Arkansas State is pointing to the wrong part of the state. I have addressed the matter on the image's talk page. If you have time, do you think you could edit the map to reflect the correct location? Thanks.↔NMajdan•talk 21:15, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): Autoblock of 24.178.78.17 lifted or expired. Sorry for the trouble! Request handled by: Luna Santin 04:37, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AFAIK, you're the last person who's actually edited the map of NCAA Division I FBS football programs at —the most recent person apparently only compressed it. Therefore, I have a small favor to ask.

Think you could change the location of one of the schools, and possibly add another?

1. Arkansas State is NOT in Little Rock. It's instead in Jonesboro, in the northeastern part of the state. This one HAS to change.
2. Western Kentucky University (please label as "Western Kentucky"), located in Bowling Green, will enter a two-year transition period from Division I FCS (formerly I-AA) to FBS in July 2007. This addition is optional for the time being, since WKU won't be a full FBS member until 2009. For more details, see the main university article and also the one for Sun Belt Conference, which Western is joining for football (it's already a member in other sports).

Thanks... Dale Arnett 20:42, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A "{{

I noticed that you are part of Category:Wikipedians against notability.

I would like to invite you to join the

Caveat: I am writing this as a wikipedian, not as a representative of Article Rescue Squadron.

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Thug U. Since you had some involvement with the Thug U redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). -- LuK3 (Talk) 19:46, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have decided to put on a mini-contest within the

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 03:42, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, All in. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, 3peat, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

KSFT ^(t|c) 03:37, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

All in (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I would like to return to editing Wikipedia. I will not engage in further sockpuppetry, all those other accounts can remain blocked. I will also do my best to comply with any other applicable policy. I think if I am given a second chance then I can be a good editor and contributor to Wikipedia.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/All_in/Archive That page lists the other accounts I have used, I will not attempt to use them or get them unblocked.

All in (talk) 16:51, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I would like to return to editing Wikipedia. I will not engage in further sockpuppetry, all those other accounts can remain blocked. I will also do my best to comply with any other applicable policy. I think if I am given a second chance then I can be a good editor and contributor to Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/All_in/Archive That page lists the other accounts I have used, I will not attempt to use them or get them unblocked. [[User:All in|All in]] ([[User talk:All in#top|talk]]) 16:51, 10 August 2022 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I would like to return to editing Wikipedia. I will not engage in further sockpuppetry, all those other accounts can remain blocked. I will also do my best to comply with any other applicable policy. I think if I am given a second chance then I can be a good editor and contributor to Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/All_in/Archive That page lists the other accounts I have used, I will not attempt to use them or get them unblocked. [[User:All in|All in]] ([[User talk:All in#top|talk]]) 16:51, 10 August 2022 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I would like to return to editing Wikipedia. I will not engage in further sockpuppetry, all those other accounts can remain blocked. I will also do my best to comply with any other applicable policy. I think if I am given a second chance then I can be a good editor and contributor to Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/All_in/Archive That page lists the other accounts I have used, I will not attempt to use them or get them unblocked. [[User:All in|All in]] ([[User talk:All in#top|talk]]) 16:51, 10 August 2022 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

All in (talk) 16:51, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Checkuser data shows no obvious block evasion, but it's a noisy range. I don't find the request particularly convincing either way so I'm not reviewing it. --Yamla (talk) 17:17, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, hopefull you won't use any socks not listed. Please describe what constructive edits you would make. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:00, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would correct errors such as spelling and grammar errors, as well as formatting errors, such as reducing overlinking or cleaning up references if other editors make mistakes or overlook things.

About 15 years ago I helped to create individual pages for seasons of the TV show "The Challenge", formerly known as "

Real World/Road Rules Challenge

". That type of article tends to attract unregistered editors to say unsourced things about those shows and/or cast members of those shows, especially prior to the show airing, and I can watch those pages to help prevent things such as BLP violations.

Later on I created the page

Most played rivalries in NCAA Division I FBS

(with the account I was using at the time). I would also make edits to keep that page and similar pages up to date.

A lot of my edits would be "

wikignome

" edits, where I correct whatever errors other editors may have missed, for whatever reason.

I am willing to answer further questions if necessary. All in (talk) 22:13, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I think you need to affirm you won't edit logged out and will not create more accounts. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:10, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I will refrain from violating the sockpuppetry policy and that includes not creating more accounts and not editing logged out. All in (talk) 15:12, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good to me. Should check with blocking admin, @Rschen7754: Ok to unblock? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:00, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that seems fine to me. --Rschen7754 18:13, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:21, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]