Talk:1920 Xalapa earthquake

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconMexico Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
project's importance scale
.

GA Review

This review is . The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Bdonjc (talk · contribs) 06:04, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (
    lists
    )
    :
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (
    reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism
    ):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Overall, this is a well-written and well-covered article. There were a few spelling and grammatical errors, but I fixed them. Bdonjctalk 04:57, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Rlink2 (talk) 00:36, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To

T:DYK

Improved to Good Article status by Dora the Axe-plorer (talk). Self-nominated at 01:28, 31 October 2022 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: None required.

Overall: @Dora the Axe-plorer: Good article. Going to approve in good faith due to foreign language sources. Onegreatjoke (talk) 13:10, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • The source says "probably the first aftershock study", but the hook assert this as a known fact. I think we need to tweak the wording in the hook. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:06, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Proposed the alt blurb. Will change the article as well.Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 00:03, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]