Talk:2005 levee failures in Greater New Orleans

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Former good article2005 levee failures in Greater New Orleans was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 2, 2006Good article nomineeListed
June 7, 2008Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 August 2021 and 16 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): BellaBryan, Bds00009, Sammysterns.

Above undated message substituted from

talk) 13:04, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on 2005 levee failures in Greater New Orleans. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:10, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely no mention of damage barges did to the levee walls?

So I was watching an interview with David Simon, the creator of 'The Wire' and another series on the New Orleans floods. He mentioned that the hurricane was only a category 1 by the time it hit NOLA and the reason the levees were breached were due to unsecured barges left by companies that had left them in the river. So, I looked it up:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ING_4727
https://www.eesi.org/articles/view/fourteen-years-later-new-orleans-is-still-trying-to-recover-from-hurricane-katrina
https://www.cs.mcgill.ca/~rwest/wikispeedia/wpcd/wp/l/Levee_failures_in_Greater_New_Orleans%252C_2005.htm
https://www.law360.com/articles/88194/excess-insurers-liable-to-50m-in-katrina-barge-crash
https://www.nola.com/news/crime_police/article_77c03069-5291-5a1f-ad7e-e7b44075817c.html
https://www.nola.com/news/weather/article_80569f99-daf2-5a6d-8a49-f1f6c293630e.html

I would obviously add this to the article, but I'm sure it will be reverted within a matter of seconds so am bringing it up here. Apeholder (talk) 17:13, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with the article on Hurricane Katrina

This and Hurricane Katrina are about the same thing. ConcentratedCobalt (talk) 19:17, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, they are not. This is about a detailed discussion of a related event. We already have more than a dozen Hurricane Katrina related articles - some topics warrant more detailed discussion, rather than trying to cram everything about all related topics into one article. -- Infrogmation (talk) 02:57, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Well, you could at the very least make a category or series template on Katrina if you refuse merging this page. ConcentratedCobalt (talk) 23:26, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand your comment. That it is one of the series of articles related to Hurricane Katrina seems to already be made very clear with info boxes at the top and at the bottom of the article. -- Infrogmation (talk) 14:23, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There was a series? Huh guess I didnt see it, my bad ConcentratedCobalt (talk) 22:03, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]