Talk:2017 Lebanon–Saudi Arabia dispute

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconIran Low‑importance
WikiProject icon
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconKuwait Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Kuwait, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Kuwait on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
WikiProject iconLebanon High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Lebanon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lebanon-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconSaudi Arabia Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Saudi Arabia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Saudi Arabia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconUnited Arab Emirates Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United Arab Emirates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Arab Emirates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Crisis not dispute

I think this is a crisis, not a dispute, in my opinion. --Leoherdy (talk) 18:30, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's possible
π, ν) 18:38, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

I agree with you, we will have to wait! --Leoherdy (talk) 04:05, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute sounded the best at the time. Happy to go with consensus. Classicwiki (talk) (ping me please) 06:06, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kidnapping (by Saudi Arabia) would be more perfect. Crisis and dispute seems to low for this. --PetarM (talk) 07:37, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why not trying something like "Saad Hariri resignation depute"? --Expectant of Light (talk) 02:01, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Two/Three sides

@A.h. king: I challenge your account and ask for your sources. "Hezbollah is part of the Lebanese government" and they have clearly positioned the same thing. Even "Saudi Arabia has accused the Lebanese government of declaring war against it because of Hezbollah's aggression". And this Newsweek article says "Both Nasrallah and Iranian President Hassan Rouhani have reportedly held talks with Aoun, who has refused to accept Hariri's resignation... Aoun, head of the majority-Christian Free Patriotic Movement, entered into an alliance with Hezbollah in 2006". And please provide a source that says the U.S. and France are supporting Lebanon against Saudi Arabia. Pahlevun (talk) 22:20, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@A.h. king:. You have not responded me for more than a week and you continue to revert other users. Pahlevun (talk) 09:01, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]