Talk:2022 in public domain

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles This article was accepted from this draft on 10 June 2020 by reviewer Buidhe (talk · contribs). Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Literature Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I removed references to the last works of Sherlock Holmes and the English translation of Bambi, A Life in the Woods becoming public domain because they were published in 1928. I removed mention of Topper because it does not have its own article and a link to 1926 in literature is included. Hekerui (talk) 10:19, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

India is 60 years pma, not 70. Yann (talk) 21:02, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Yann, I was wondering the same. Good time to make the necessary changes then? Because I was looking to upload works of some artists who died later than the ones mentioned in here, but have completed more than 60 years. DesiBoy101 (talk) 17:46, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Hathi Trust
• Duke’s Center for the Study of the Public Domain

That "extension of copyright from life + 50 to life + 70 years in Japan did not apply retroactively" does not mean Japanese persons should not be listed, it's relevant to all other countries with a 70 year copyright term. Hekerui (talk) 00:15, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Hekerui: It does mean that Japanese people who died in 1951 shouldn't be listed here but on 2002 in public domain, when their works entered the public domain because the copyright term was still life + 50 years. Admittedly it was lazy of me to only remove them here but not add them there. Yorwba (talk) 15:40, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, Japanese entries are not about Japan exclusively just like American entries are not about the US. There is a different section for that. Hekerui (talk) 17:12, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

eNdwedwe eMontebello qwaqwa ra ode 165.73.224.168 (talk) 03:13, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]