Talk:AI@50

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconComputer science Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

WikiProject iconUnited States: Dartmouth Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject New Hampshire - Dartmouth College (assessed as Low-importance).

Older comments

Need assistance with:

  • links to cited conference papers -- at least all the "Selected Papers"  Done; more presentations are lurking in self-archives, no doubt
  • re-attachment of once-attached conference logo, for nonprofit, educational use under Fair Use provisions for scholarly purpose of AI@50 article (and also, Fair Use claimed because of significant ($200,000) U.S. governmental DARPA funding for conference, as cited in article: image URL http://www.dartmouth.edu/~ai50/images/logo.gif

Thanks! Especially to Meg Houston Maker for her excellent conference notes --Paulscrawl 06:36, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]


I understand Springer's journal Minds and Machines charges authors $3,000 for "Open Choice" option, allowing a version of public (hardly open) access, but other options exist -- draft or pre-publication version, self-archived or institutionally archived or deposited at, say, http://www.philpapers.org See Springer's Self-Archiving Policy

Not trying to put any particular author or publisher on the spot for doing what is still all too routine in academia, but I'm genuinely interested in making this Wikipedia page the definitive portal for accessing publicly-funded reports on the status and prospects of AI@50. And I would like to encourage the AI community to embrace Open Access. A year after proprietary publication is long enough. The apparent absence of promised DARPA publication of conference proceedings after two years is frustrating; publication of public goods for private profits is disturbing. Paulscrawl (talk) 10:05, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Found most of the "Selected papers" journal entries and self-archived editions. Still missing a few of the "Selected Papers":

Steinhart's paper -- no self-archive at http://www.ericsteinhart.com/index.html or http://ww3.wpunj.edu/cohss/philosophy/steinhart/

Schmidt's paper - no self-archive found at http://paristech.academia.edu/CSCHMIDT

Andersons' paper - no self-archive found at http://uhaweb.hartford.edu/anderson/MachineEthics/PublicationsConsortium.html

Guarini's paper - no self-archive found at http://web2.uwindsor.ca/courses/philosophy/mguarini/index.html

Easily posted on [1] if anyone cares to -- just let me know where posted & I can link

Linked to Peter Norvig's photo gallery of conference participants -- he has linked to this page for years and I'm glad to have finally updated scholarly refs. One book already citing this historic conference, Nils Nilsson's The Quest for Artificial Intelligence, is highly recommended to anyone who cares about last 50 years and rest of their lifetime. Fantastic history! Paulscrawl (talk) 02:51, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To do

Norvig gave same-titled talk in oct. 2006 at Xerox Parc; link to movie: http://www.parc.com/event/499/web-search-as-a-product-of-and-catalyst-for-ai.html

Granger's "AI50"-titled 2006 paper at http://www.dartmouth.edu/~rhg/pubs/RHGai50.pdf

Paulscrawl (talk) 19:22, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Restoration of Notes and Comments

The links I originally made (July 2006) to the truly unique and very useful notes and comments of sole conference blogger Meg Houston Maker (whose work inspired this page) were deleted by an admin back in December 2011. This was apparently based on a misunderstanding all around - I thought it was Meg's wish, based on her edit tag of "possible conflict of interest"; admin thought that edit was possible link spam (she innocently redirected my original links from her former company domain name to her new personal domain name, close to her Wikipedia user name); Meg may have thought I somehow knew what was going on. I didn't, until looking at history on her User page today.

I am restoring these links to her conference blog entries as highly informative adjuncts to the much briefer conference summary published by conference organizer James Moor in AI Magazine. Paulscrawl (talk) 23:18, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on AI@50. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:11, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]