Talk:AMIA bombing

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on July 18, 2012.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Argentina High‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Argentina, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Argentina. If you would like to participate, you can improve AMIA bombing, or sign up and contribute to a wider array of articles like those on our to do list.ArgentinaWikipedia:WikiProject ArgentinaTemplate:WikiProject ArgentinaArgentine articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Automobiles Low‑importance Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Crime and Criminal Biography: Serial, mass, and spree killers Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Serial Killer task force (assessed as Low-importance). project's importance scale .

International relations Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

	Iran Low‑importance
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Islam: Islam and Controversy / Shi'a Islam Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Islam and Controversy task force. This article is supported by the Shi'a Islam task force.

Jewish history Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Terrorism Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Terrorism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on terrorism, individual terrorists, incidents and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TerrorismWikipedia:WikiProject TerrorismTemplate:WikiProject TerrorismTerrorism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article: You must be logged-in and making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive) You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. Further information The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are: Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive. Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required. With respect to the WP:1RR restriction: Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring. Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence. After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process . Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions. Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard. If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!

Archives

Index Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

This article presents the carbomb theory as a fact, when it is in fact only a theory put forth by corrupt intelligence services and the corrupt judiciary of my country. Things like the absence of the two policemen that were meant to be close to the building, the unclear practices of the security apparatus when it came to the production of "evidence" (the van's motor). The article in its current state only obliquely points toward the unreliability of the narrative in sections liek the one on Berro, but the main part of the article deceptively states as fact things that are dubious at best 2803:9800:9504:7B33:4B6C:CC1A:D8EF:BD67 (talk) 01:58, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Replace dead hyperlink in reference 18

Change: http://www.worldpolicy.org/what-nisman-said-about-iran^[1]

To: http://www.rhesq.com/What_Nisman_Said_About_Iran.pdf^[2] 206209nyc (talk) 18:04, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Handmeanotherbagofthemchips (talk) 21:53, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is requested that an edit be made to the extended-confirmed-protected article at AMIA bombing. (edit · history · last · links · protection log) This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y". The edit may be made by any extended confirmed user. Remember to change the |answered=no parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input. This is so that inactive or completed requests don't needlessly fill up the edit requests category. You may also wish to use the {{EEp}} template in the response. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request.

The article is outdated, please update it.

In April 2024, 30 years after the attack, the Argentine justice finally confirmed that the government of Iran was the mastermind behind the attack and ordered its execution. The Criminal Cassation Chamber established that Iran orchestrated the massacre and classified it as a crime against humanity. The judges of the second instance, Carlos Mahiques, Diego Barroetaveña, and Ángela Ledesma, ruled that the attack was part of Iran's political and strategic design and was executed by the terrorist organization Hezbollah.

Sources:

• Argentine Court Says Iran Was Behind Israeli Embassy and Jewish Center Attacks
• Argentine high court rules Iran behind AMIA bombing, calls it ‘crime against humanity’
• AMIA bombing: Argentina court holds 'terrorist state' Iran, Hezbollah responsible
• Argentina court blames Iran for deadly 1994 bombing of Jewish center
• "Atentado a la AMIA: de Javier Milei a la oposición, la reacción tras el fallo que culpó a Irán". LA NACION (in Spanish). 2024-04-12. Retrieved 2024-04-12.
• Centenera, Mar (2024-04-12). "La justicia argentina declara "crimen de lesa humanidad" el atentado contra la mutual judía AMIA". El País Argentina (in Spanish). Retrieved 2024-04-12.
• >Press, Por DÉBORA REY y ALMUDENA CALATRAVA Associated (2024-04-12). "Milei y la comunidad judía argentina celebran el fallo que señala a Irán por el ataque a la AMIA". Los Angeles Times en Español (in Spanish). Retrieved 2024-04-12.

In 2023, on appeal, the Federal Chamber of Cassation revoked the dismissal that Cristina Fernández de Kirchner had benefited from and ordered her to be tried for the alleged cover-up for which Alberto Nisman accused her regarding the Argentina-Iran Memorandum of Understanding. The relatives of the victims of the AMIA attack had demanded that the oral trial against the former president be held.The reasons are that "the accused persons are attributed to the organization of a complex criminal plan to achieve or favor the impunity of the Iranian citizens suspected of having participated in the terrorist attack on the AMIA headquarters through two parallel channels, one formal - with the signing of the memorandum of understanding - and another informal, with unofficial negotiations."

Sources:

• "AMIA | Argentina confirma responsabilidad de Irán en el caso de la mutual judía: ¿por qué no ha ido a juicio el peor atentado en la historia del país?". BBC News Mundo (in Spanish). 2024-04-12. Retrieved 2024-04-12.
• Criales, José Pablo (2023-09-19). "La justicia argentina reabre dos causas contra Cristina Kirchner y la envía a juicio oral". El País Argentina (in Spanish). Retrieved 2024-04-12.
• "Memorándum con Irán: Cristina Kirchner también irá a juicio por el encubrimiento del ataque a la AMIA". infobae (in European Spanish). 2023-09-18. Retrieved 2024-04-12.
• Salinas, Lucía (2024-04-12). "Los efectos de un fallo histórico por la AMIA: la Corte tiene en sus manos la última carta de Cristina para evitar el juicio por el Pacto con Irán". Clarín (in Spanish). Retrieved 2024-04-12.

Jalu (talk) 23:52, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Call to Arrest the irainan minister

https://www.kan.org.il/content/kan-news/global/741616/ 2A0D:6FC0:B6D:E300:C42E:D898:45E:B42E (talk) 07:31, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]