Talk:A Short Biographical Dictionary of English Literature

	This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Books This article has been marked as needing an infobox. inactive .Reference worksWikipedia:WikiProject Reference worksTemplate:WikiProject Reference worksReference works articles

Literature Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"The Gutenberg version of this e-book is on one long page, with HTML encoding. Although this is a suitable format for textual processing, it is suffers from the usual usability problems of long pages. The www.321books.co.uk/gutenberg/cousin/front.htm 321Books version of Cousin's biographical dictionary] provides a more usable version. It demonstrates how a book-long page can be parsed into several hundred HTML pages, indexed, and made more usable."

This seems little more than barely disguised spam. It has very little to do with the subject, and is incorrect in spots.--82.92.181.129 12:22, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I concur, so much so that I am removing the link. Wachholder0 19:48, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've marked this for notability because it's claim to notability -- being the 5000th proof-read title in Project Gutenberg -- is not valid. -- Mikeblas (talk) 22:28, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]