Talk:Abu'l-Qasim al-Tayyib

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

[Untitled]

The article cites "According to Ṭayyibī Musta‘lid Isma‘ili Muslims, aṭ-Ṭayyib Abī l-Qāṣim ((lang-ar|الطيب أبي القاسم)) was the 21st and last Fatimid Imām". But actually he is not thought to be LAST Imam. He is considered to be in Occultation in which his sons after sons are also Imams. Ali Asgher (talk) 08:10, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on

At-Tayyib Abu'l-Qasim. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ
for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Sourcecheck
}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:08, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

His fate was unknown

User:Cplakidas If his fate was unknown, then he could have died or he could have been killed or alternatively he could have lived on. You undid my revision removing the speculation of him having died. If you want to add speculations by historians, you can do so by explicitly saying that later in the article. In the said speculation, the article says:

In the ensuing power struggle, al-Tayyib's fate is unknown: he may have died or been killed by one of the rival strongmen.

I'm simply correcting it to:

Amidst the ensuing power struggle, the fate of al-Tayyib remains uncertain.

Which is a perfectly sound thing to do. DistributorScientiae (talk)