Talk:Ada Jafri

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ada Jafri article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in Pakistani English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

A fact from Ada Jafri appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 December 2013, and was viewed approximately 2,644 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Ada Jafri (pictured) is the first Urdu poetess?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2013/December. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ada Jafri.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Pakistan High‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Poetry

	Poetry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Feminism Mid‑importance

	Feminism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page should not be speedy deleted because...

I am workING on it... Just wait a bit to know its significance. —

ШαмıQ✍ @ 10:12, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Apologies for the quick nomination, didn't realize you were working on it Verdict78 (talk) 10:38, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Manual RTL; overuse of Urdu on en.wiki Why is this being so frequently and so inconsistently coded manually with RTL style? Our language templates for languages like Urdu handle this. This article is over-using Urdu text, which is meaningless to most of our readers, anyway. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼ 23:31, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
PS: I moved a big block of it, that was being incorrectly presented as a pull quote, into a citation and kept the English version as a standard block quotation, which is how this would be handled in any other article. However, the citation is incomplete. Various sources are cited in that section, but none of them are identified as the actual source of that particular quotation. The quoted Urdu poem I left in, though I don't see that it serves any purpose for English readers. It would be much more useful to present the English meaning, than show them Urdu and phonetic transcription of the Urdu. This is not how we approach articles on writers in any other language. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼ 23:35, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

👍🏻 Mariasbajwa (talk) 13:09, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ada Jafri. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added `{{dead link}}` tag to http://www.saudigazette.com.sa/index.cfm?method=home.regcon&contentid=20130822177704

Added `{{dead link}}` tag to http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/islamabad/14-Mar-2015/ada-jafri-s-death-termed-a-colossal-loss-to-urdu-literature

Added `{{dead link}}` tag to http://www.urdutimes.com/content/76071

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150402132800/http://www.southasianmedia.net/stories/pakistan/urdu-media/242954-story to http://www.southasianmedia.net/stories/pakistan/urdu-media/242954-story

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template `{{source check`
`}}` (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.

If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:27, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]