Talk:Adrianne Palicki

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Women This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles Biography: Actors and Filmmakers This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance). United States: Ohio Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio (assessed as Low-importance).

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist. [[Lost in Space#Second television series|The Robinsons: Lost in Space]] The anchor (#Second television series) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before. Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

has 5 tattos, angel wings(wrist), the name of her parents(inside of her bicep), an unknown symbol on her lower back, supergirl tattoo, and another unknown (possibly arabic) symbol on her ankle. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.109.82.238 (talk) 22:40, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

the word bicep does not exist: the one muscle is called biceps, with an S 2A01:CB0C:CD:D800:B1C5:1E95:9E6:61B9 (talk) 20:22, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Two things about her playing Wonder Woman for a short time in 2011: first, in order to get the role, she had breast augmentation surgery so that she could play the role "to the hilt". If you watch her in Friday Night Lights and compare her to how she looks on SHIELD, it's obvious that she had the surgery. Second, the show wasn't picked up by NBC (after they greenlighted the project in the first place) because, after about three weeks of recording, NBC executives watched the "dailies" (what was recorded each day) and adjudged the show was bad for its insipid dialogue/bad writing. NBC didn't even want to hire new writers to try and salvage the project, proving how bad the writing was. 2601:1C0:4F00:B800:4CE6:3EA7:BD09:E8C6 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 21:00, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can we please get a better picture, the one currently being used in the InfoBox looks like shes totally pissed off. Dancing is Forbidden (talk) 17:23, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree could we use this picture instead? http://allcelebpics.files.wordpress.com/2009/01/adrianne-palicki001.jpg Seracs (talk) 22:42, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Extremely unattractive picture! Someone, please replace! Newwhist (talk) 19:47, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is now Dec 24 2014 and the ugly photo is still there. Someone please change it. 2601:0:7480:3E9:468:A8EB:776D:1C82 (talk) 07:05, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt it'll be changed anytime soon. And replacing it with a better picture would probably be a waste of time because some idiot will probably revert it. So I'm not going to bother. It's as if it's a rule on this site for beautiful actresses to have bad InfoBox pictures. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:8:8001:ED30:B1B0:F222:C147:85EF (talk) 07:55, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

She looks mingin in the current pic, can someone change it? shes usually proper bangin. nice bod too! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.143.73.19 (talk) 10:39, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Palicki family name is of Lithuanian origin and actually 1.80 m height shows that...and facial features are of Lithuanians not poles...however due to long history of union many Lithuanians even do not know that they are not poles, but Lithuanians...so sad...but family names help to entangle this —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.180.61.237 (talk) 05:10, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

what are you responing to? there is no talk about the Polishness of Palicki neither in the article nor in the discussion panel. BTW "Palicki" actually is typically Polish surname and there are still hundreds of thousands indigenous Poles in lithuania83.7.161.175 (talk) 12:50, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And I really doubt that the "1.80 m height" is a good indicator of somebody's ethnic background. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.229.109.181 (talk) 16:57, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just to clarify, is her name pronounced "Pallicky" or "Palitsky"? Nuttyskin (talk) 22:09, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I guess, while the original version should be "Palitsky", the americanised version would be "Pallicky". --SamWinchester000 (talk) 22:09, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can we get a different one? Maybe one that shows how she normally looks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.243.45.100 (talk) 14:18, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What does she use? Paliky or Palitsky? 205.189.94.17 (talk) 19:50, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

TMZ has reported that she has filed for divorce from her husband after 2 months.

https://www.tmz.com/2019/07/22/adrianne-palicki-files-for-divorce-from-scott-grimes/

Should this be mentioned? B.Valley (talk) 03:54, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

maybe not; without context it does look like things are spinning out of control for her (which need not be the case). Also: was she really nominated for a best actress award? standards of acting in US shows are astoundingly high, and she is about the only one on The Orville who markedly falls short of them. 2A01:CB0C:CD:D800:B1C5:1E95:9E6:61B9 (talk) 20:26, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]