Talk:Aluminium compounds
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
subarticle is kept separate from the main article, Aluminium, due to size or style considerations. |
 | Text and/or other creative content from this version of for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Requested move 5 May 2021
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 07:49, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
- Compounds of aluminium → Aluminium compounds
- Compounds of carbon → Carbon compounds
- Compounds of fluorine → Fluorine compounds
- Compounds of lead → Lead compounds
- Compounds of oxygen → Oxygen compounds
- Compounds of palladium(III) → Palladium(III) compounds
- Compounds of thorium → Thorium compounds
- Compounds of zinc → Zinc compounds
– Consistency with the subcategories and the other articles in Category:Chemical compounds by element, such as Argon compounds and its parallel Category:Argon compounds. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:05, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support all. I'm all for consistency, and the old format will still get searchers to the right place via redirects. Mdewman6 (talk) 16:42, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support. Starting the article titles with the element rather that "compounds" is better for searches. Rreagan007 (talk) 23:21, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support all per the above two. Double sharp (talk) 06:41, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support all Same reason as the above. Keresluna (talk) 16:56, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Start with a plan
- This article seems to be a well-intentioned but pile of random stuff and factoids. I mean: read the first paragraph. Readers expect to see organized plan for COMPOUNDS, not alloys, not reactions, not electron configuration, not Al metal. Why not start with a plan, then fill it in. Greenwood and Earshaw is a good starting point, perhaps. Another possible plan is below, but we need to start with a plan.
Oxidation state (III)
- halides
- binaries
- ate compounds
- binary chalcogenides
- binaries
- ate compounds
- organic derivatives (see organoAl)
- metal organic complexes