Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
Deceptive anti-Obama ad needs to be mentioned
An impeccable reliable source documents the attempted deception:
My edit summary was botched, but I have been bold and removed the POV label from this article. It appears that all content is currently referenced, and while more is needed on Crossroads's history of activities, at present it is not biased. Please air specific concerns here, or edit the relevant content.
I have restored it. The article is currently worded to express bias, using expressions such as Crossroads said A; however, not-A... and reminding people that its prediction that Obama would lose to Romney was wrong. I have removed some of it; more is needed. DGG ( talk ) 16:33, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
New Majority Agenda
New Majority Agenda redirects here but isn't mentioned anywhere in the article, or in any other article. Can a mention be added so someone who searches for it is taken to something useful, or should the redirect be deleted? (Pinging Trivialist, who created the redirect in 2012.) – Arms & Hearts (talk) 14:58, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply
]
I added a mention to the article. Trivialist (talk) 00:12, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
