Talk:Anne Graham Lotz

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Sources?

This entry needs the sources properly attributed. Deriobamba (talk) 18:34, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Anne Graham Lotz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Sourcecheck
}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:42, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Connotations

Hello. Was this article written by someone who dislikes Anne Graham? I stumbled upon this link while reading about another person and I noticed it has negative undertones. Given that I didn't know she existed until 2 minutes ago, it felt critical and castigating. One example would be this excerpt:

Lotz "became" a Christian at the age of about eight years old after having been indoctrinated by her parents for years and watching The King of Kings, a Cecil B. DeMille film, on Good Friday.

Became is the correct wording for someone who chooses to be a Christian. If used in any other way, these quotation marks add doubt and uncertainty. Why is the article writer uncertain about that?

The use of the word indoctrinated also has a negative connotation. Anything we learn as children can be considered indoctrination, from how we pull our socks to how we do our hair. This word seems inappropriate, nicer alternatives are "taught" or "instructed".

Few things are worse than a biased Wikipedia article. We don't have to like any of these people or topics. SeleneMarie (talk) 20:17, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This was simple vandalism, which wasn't caught (it was done in February) but has now been reverted. StAnselm (talk) 21:14, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Discrepency

In the Early Life section it says she married Dr. Daniel Lotz on September 9, 1966. Under Death of Spouse, it says "Lotz's husband, Daniel Lotz, 78, died on August 19, 2015. He was discovered unresponsive in their backyard swimming pool two days before their 49th anniversary." The dates do not match up as two days apart - it's closer to 3 weeks. Spiritcapsule (talk) 03:46, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]