Talk:Anthrozoology

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Excised content useful for finding references

While inappropriate in this form, this content contains many useful references.
Example papers
  • "Placing the Wild in the City:'Thinking with' Melbourne’s Bats" (Thomson 2007)
  • "More Than a Furry Companion: The Ripple Effect of Companion Animals on Neighborhood Interactions and Sense of Community" (Wood et al. 2007)
  • "Engaging the Animal in the Moving Image" (Porter 2006)
  • "Hunting and Illegal Violence Against Humans and Other Animals: Exploring the Relationship" (Flynn 2006)
  • "Between Ideals, Realities, and Popular Perceptions: An Analysis of the Multifaceted Nature of London Zoo" (Ito 2006)
Related authors
External links
Books
Journals
Professional Bodies, Research Centers and Journals
Papers published by the International Society for the Study of Anthrozoology
  • Compatibility Stereotypes of People and Pets
  • Behavior of Children with Learning Disabilities Interacting with a Therapy Dog
  • Realistic Representations of Companion Animals in Comic Art in the USA
  • Advertising Animal Protection
  • Speciesism, Anthropocentrism, and Non-Western Cultures
  • Whale Shark Tourism in Ningaloo Marine Park, Australia
  • Judgments of Cruelty to Animals: Sex Differences and Effect of Awareness of Suffering
  • Motivations and Characteristics of Volunteer Flying-Fox Rehabilitators in Australia
  • Pets’ Roles in Parents’ Bereavement
  • Recent Shifts Regarding the Relationship between People and Other Animals in Japanese Culture
  • How Depressive Moods Affect the Behavior of Singly Living Persons Towards Their Cats
  • Bonds of trust shown between Zookeepers and Captive Animals
Websites
Research links
  • I've moved this content from the article page, which was formed from
    Human–animal studies. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 04:56, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply
    ]

External Links

I changed the links section around a bit, hoping to make the link organization a little more relevant to people looking for more information. After a little bit of internal debate, I chose the following separations:

Professional Bodies, Research Centers and Journals - This is meant to link people to organizations and journals as opposed to information on the topic. I limited this to academic research oriented bodies; if there are non-academic organizations that need links they should be in a new, discrete category.

Websites - Links to websites that contain information on the topic of anthrozoology. This is a harder place to distinguish academic from non-academic affiliation, so I chose to use the loose rubric of "websites." In the future as (and if) more websites are added, it may be necessary to distinguish academic from non so readers are clear where information is coming from.

Links to Web-Accessible Academic Research by Author - I thought this would be a nice feature for people looking for research information. This section should link to pages that contain full-text academic research accessible without special credentials or authentication (i.e. university affiliation). I chose by author as a reasonable grouping since what I was aware of being available were lists on the websites of individual authors. If someone else is aware of pages with accessible research grouped in other ways (by subject, by journal, etc.) please feel free to make another link category. If you wish to link to research that requires some form of authentication, please make another category as well.

illovich 20:16, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Furries

Considering that they are half-animal and half-human, and that research on them has been published in what appears to be an anthrozoology journal, shouldn't they fit?--70.244.242.73 (talk) 00:30, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's the first thing I thought of when I saw the title of the article, almost certainly because that's what I associate the phrase "anthro" with in relation to animals. flarn2006 [
t c] time: 03:17, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Reality?

The article says, "A major focus of anthrozoologic research is the quantifying of the positive effects of human-animal relationships on either party and the study of the reality of their interactions." Uh... the reality of their interactions? As opposed to what? The fantasy of their interactions? I don't understand the significance of the word "reality" in this context. Is it necessary to use that word? - dcljr (talk) 22:49, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've gone ahead and removed the phrase "the reality of". - dcljr (talk) 18:46, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cat people and dog people

Please consider creating this proposed article on an extremely notable topic. (Sources are included).--Coin945 (talk) 15:30, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anthrozoology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Sourcecheck
}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:16, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Journal entries

As well as Anthrozoös, there's Animalia: An Anthrozoology Journal, and The Journal of Applied AnthroZoology (JAAZ).

There's also several relevant American universities that could be mentioned.

Signed - Gellert Grindelwald BVSc 49.184.195.195 (talk) 07:08, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]