Talk:Architecture of the California missions
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Architecture of the California missions article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Architecture of the California missions was one of the Art and architecture good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Re-Review and In-line citations
Members of the
- I've linked to the original id of the article when it was made GA, but not to any id after the in-line citations were added. In my opinion, this article now passes the inline citation criteria. Carcharoth 22:39, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
GA Reassessment
- This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Architecture of the California missions/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.
- herefor criteria)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- The lead section of an article this size should be longer than one short paragraph.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- There are too few inline citations, to the extent that there are even entire paragraphs or sections missing citations entirely. Some of this material needs verification. The language is also unencyclopaedic at times, and can give the impression of original research, for instance: "No study of the missions would be complete without some discussion of their extensive water supply systems."
- There are too few inline citations, to the extent that there are even entire paragraphs or sections missing citations entirely. Some of this material needs verification. The language is also unencyclopaedic at times, and can give the impression of
- a (references): b (citations to
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of viewpolicy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have
- Overall:
"alike" vs. "identical"
While no two missions are "identical", they are "alike" in that they use the same building materials and similar architectural style. I have fixed this in the lead. --Pseudo-Richard (talk) 23:27, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Architecture of the California missions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050513212743/http://www.californiamissions.com:80/ to http://www.californiamissions.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:09, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
Convento
According to Miriam-Webster, "priest's quarters" and convento are synonymous: [1]. These are listed separately in the 'Site selection and layout' section; I don't know how or if this should be corrected. 107.15.157.44 (talk) 19:37, 1 June 2022 (UTC)