This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
What is meant by two formats? In the intro this seems an awkward phrase when referring to buildings.Dr. BlofeldWhite cat 10:50, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
There is inconsistency in the capitalisation of Dhamma or dhamma.Dr. BlofeldWhite cat 11:04, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
In the history section there is a lot of information which is irrelevant to the edicts. A brief is OK but it is supposed to be a history of the edicts not the person who established them..Dr. BlofeldWhite cat 11:10, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ashokan edicts, which have special significance in view of the message they convey, were found in his vast empire in several languages and scripts. What do you mean, found in his vast empire? There is a confusion here between time and place.Dr. BlofeldWhite cat 11:13, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You have the tendency to use the word "vis-à-vis" quite a lot. This word is not used much in English speech, in fact I cannot recall ever hearing anybody say it. It is more common to say something was "adjacent to" , "directly opposite" or the english words face to face rather than the french saying..Dr. BlofeldWhite cat 12:05, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the comments. These have been addressed now.--Nvvchar (talk) 23:56, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I saw the review observations just now. I will make changes and also reply in the next two days. Thanks.--Nvvchar 13:01, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
File:Ashoka2.jpg Nominated for Deletion
An image used in this article, File:Ashoka2.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011
What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
If the image is
non-free
then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no