Talk:August Dehnel

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Poland Low‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Proposal to swap redirects

I found this page after reading an article in the Guardian . I feel that main article should be

Dehnel phenomenon, with August Dehnel as a redirect, as it's really about shrews' skulls rather than a biography: do others agree? ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 21:58, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Requested move 2 November 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (

talk) 07:08, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

August Dehnel → Dehnel phenomenon – As per my comment above, the majority of this article is about the phenomenon, rather than being a biography of the scientist. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 10:48, 2 November 2017 (UTC) Relisted. Jenks24 (talk) 15:35, 9 November 2017 (UTC)--Relisting. —usernamekiran(talk) 01:25, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose This article is about a respected scientist who did more than is written in this neglected article. At the same time, IMO the phenomenon deserves a separate article.
talk) 20:32, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.