Talk:Augustin Bea

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Book removal

I removed the book added by another user because he had added the same book to a number of articles. I view this practise as a form of spamming--directing people to outside resources (i.e. advertising them) without making substantive contributions to the WP page. Moreover, I'd prefer to do away with the 'books about Bea' section entirely, because such sections are given over to such spamming. Carl.bunderson (talk) 21:54, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have not read that book to know if it is relevant to Bea. Has anyone here actually read that book to know? The criterion should probably be the relevance, and that can not be determined from the cover. Is there a book review for it? That might say somethng too. The other two books are highly relevant because they are directly about him. History2007 (talk) 22:17, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I guess I'm very hard on including thigs like this. I find it unnecessary. If it is a worthwhile piece, the person adding it can make a substantive edit to the article, referenced from the work they want to include, then it may be included. I don't doubt that they're relevant works, I just don't think we need sections such as this. Carl.bunderson (talk)
Ok, but please let us hear from those who have read that martin book. Thanks. History2007 (talk) 22:46, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The Martin book is now listed twice. Once under Books about Bea, and then further down under Biography. I should think once was enough.
talk) 22:31, 2 October 2012 (UTC)Mannanan51[reply
]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Augustin Bea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Sourcecheck
}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:19, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]