Talk:Azerbaijan Soviet Socialist Republic

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Old talk

I reverted insertion of picture which claimed that it was showing Azerbaijani soldiers of SS, while in fact it were "Muslim volunteers in German army in Berlin" [1] --Grandmaster 11:57, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted a sock of the banned user. Banned users are not entitled to edit Wikipedia. --Grandmaster 06:00, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed move to Azerbaijan Soviet Socialist Republic

It seems that given that the formal name for this nation was "Azerbaijan Soviet Socialist Republic", the soviet prefix abbreviation (-"SSR") shouldn't be in the full article name. Therefore, I propose to move the article to its full form, Azerbaijan Soviet Socialist Republic. We wouldn't have an article about North Korea titled "DPRK", would we? --Micahbrwn (talk) 09:52, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The move makes sense, but should be synchronized with the titles of the other 14 articles about Soviet republics. If we move one, we need to move them all. Grandmaster (talk) 12:48, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please discuss this multimove
here --Lox (t,c) 11:47, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Fair use rationale for Image:Soviet-woman-veil.jpg

fair use
.

Please go to

Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline
is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

talk) 05:33, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Azerbaijan/Azerbaidzhan?

Obviously, "Azerbaijan" is the correct transcription now (and should have been then), but during the Soviet period the usual spelling in English-language sources was the transliteration from the Cyrillic, "Azerbaidzhan". Should this article not therefore use the spelling "Azerbaidzhan" with reference to the S.S.R., so as not to be anachronistic? RandomCritic (talk) 01:50, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sumgait pogrom

The death toll is likely to be much higher than the figures stated in this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.152.178.95 (talk) 13:43, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Transheya.jpg

The image

requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation
linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --17:06, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article editing

There are certain users who have been editing other SSR articles on Wikipedia for the past year, by stating that the soviet republics existed until the adoption of their new constitutions in the mid-1990s.

Azerbaijan SSR declared itself independent and changed its name to the

People's Republic of Hungary ended in 1989, but an all-new constitution was first made in 2011. Should we also say that the PR of Hungary existed until 2011, then? That would make little sense. Although Azerbaijan did not adopt a new constitution before 1995, there's no doubt about that it was a totally different state. It had a totally different form of government, its name was changed, it was an independent state (not a federated state), it was not a Soviet socialist republic. These factors are a lot more independent than the adoption of an all-new constitution. And although the constitution was not all-new, and formally the same constitution although heavily amended, it was amended to fit a new state and was not really the same constitution in practice. You'll have to agree that the 1991 transition is a lot more historically significant change in Azerbaijan's history than the adoption of a new constitution. A.h. king • Talk to me! 00:23, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Artsakh?

Why is there not even a mention of Artsakh or the associated dispute? 61.3.177.49 (talk) 11:37, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:34, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Countries which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 23:46, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Padronização das páginas Sobre as Repúblicas Soviéticas

Em minha opinião para facilitar o entendimento deveríamos padronizar as páginas sobre as Repúblicas Soviéticas (RSS) já que muitas delas tem o cargo de Primeiro Secretário (líder de facto da República) junto com o cargo de Presidente do Presidium ("Presidente da República") algo que não acontece em outras páginas sobre as Repúblicas Soviéticas, por exemplo na página sobre a RSS Ucrâniana temos os Cargos de Primeiro Secretário do Partido Comunista Ucraniano separado do Cargo de Presidente do Presidium (Chefe de Estado). Tatigui (talk) 15:34, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]