Talk:Battle of Birch Coulee

Minnesota Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: North America / United States / American Civil War Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  North American military history task force United States military history task force American Civil War task force

All accounts mention mounted Rangers when there were no mounted units mustered into service in Minnesota until after this Battle. Additionally, all regular Army Cavalry had been withdrawn from frontier for service against the Southern rebellion.Mcb133aco (talk) 17:13, 12 January 2021 (UTC)mcb133acoMcb133aco (talk) 17:13, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I added the unbalanced tag to this article as it lacks motivation or explanation for attacks by the Dakota people or any sort of "aftermath" that pertains to them. This conflict had two sides and only one side is represented here.  oncamera  _{(talk page)} 11:17, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]