Talk:Battle of Radzymin (1920)

	Battle of Radzymin (1920) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
	This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on December 11, 2012.
Article milestones Date Process Result December 14, 2011 Good article nominee Listed December 31, 2011 WikiProject A-class review Not approved February 3, 2012 WikiProject A-class review Approved February 26, 2012 Featured article candidate Not promoted April 28, 2012 Featured article candidate Promoted A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on August 16, 2020. Current status: Featured article

This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: European / Polish / Russian & Soviet / World War I This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Associated task forces: /  European military history task force Polish military history task force Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force World War I task force Additional information: /  This article has passed an A-Class review. Poland Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Soviet Union: Military Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force.

Archives (Index)

2012/January 2012/February 2012/December 2016/October 2017/May 2017/September

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

This review is

transcluded from Talk:Battle of Radzymin (1920)/GA1

. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Harrison49 (talk · contribs) 22:17, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   Prose is good throughout.

   B.

   lists

   :

   Layout and all the rest is good and consistent. There are six links to disambiguation pages which need changing according to the tool.

   talk) 13:40, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply

   ]

   Thanks for doing that. It might be that Dybów is linked to elsewhere in the article. Harrison49 (talk) 20:19, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

    Done, 3 remaining names disambiguated. //Halibutt 21:49, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A.

   References to sources

   :

   Sections are all backed by references. One web link for Szczepański (2002) no longer works and needs to be changed or removed.

    Done I've fixed this by replacing it with a link to an earlier version of the same article on the

   talk) 14:03, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply

   ]

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   References are reliable and well placed.

   C. No original research:

   See above.

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

   The article covers the major aspects and remains focused.

4. Is it
   neutral
   ?

   Fair representation without bias:

   The article maintains a neutral point of view.

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

   The article does not appear to be subject to any edit warring.

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have

   fair use rationales

   :

   All images are either within the public domain or published under Creative Commons licensing.

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with

   suitable captions

   :

   Captions are informative and well used.

7. Overall: Once the change to an external link and links to disambiguation pages are made, I will be able to pass this article. Harrison49 (talk) 13:25, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

   Pass or Fail:

   A very good article. Good luck with the A-class review. Harrison49 (talk) 19:29, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is generally accepted by western historians that the battle of Warsaw was a draw. Both the Poles (who had seen their invasion of Russia all the way to Kiev reversed) and the Russians were totally exhausted, the Russians also having outrun their supply lines. All talk of "decisive victory" by the Poles is pure nationalist propaganda. 2A00:23C4:B617:7D01:2CC0:9BBF:990F:17CF (talk) 07:36, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]