Talk:Biovista

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Virginia Low‑importance

	Virginia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Pharmacology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I am not sure for what reason you are labeling this page as advertising.

When the page was first labeled as such I took good notice. Being new to Wikipedia I realized that I had forgotten some useful information like sections on research projects and external links. I also looked very carefully at other companies like Pfizer and InforSense to see their general style and attempted to follow those.

I have included an entry on Biovista because I think they are active in a very important area, at a time when drug development is undergoing a transition in terms of technologies and how new treatments for disease are developed. This company happens to be doing some interesting work on a couple of fronts (e.g database design and text mining as well as predicting unwanted side effects of drugs) and therefore are potentially of interest to a significant number of Wikipedia users. It therefore has significant encyclopedic value since users can obtain a new perspective on drug development following the various scientific areas that the company is working on.

If in your opinion it is a matter of style let me know what you don't like and I will be glad to address it. Even better I'd appreciate your opinion on how the section you do not approve of should be modified.

Thanks. Xtisths (talk) 13:59, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there Xtisths. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! What we have here is a failure to understand Wikipedia's notability requirements. "Interesting work" and "potential interest to a significant number of Wikipedia users" are not valid reasons for establishing notability. Can you take a look at

Tan ǀ 39 15:14, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Here we go, there's a few. Incorporate information from the following coverage:

Article about missing funding (bizjournal)

Article on $30M investment from Gold Leaf (bnet)

Same article on WRAL

I'm not sure these articles can establish "significant coverage", but it's a start.

Tan ǀ 39 15:20, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Changes to the article have been made to address the issue of inadequate coverage as stated above. Xtisths (talk) 14:43, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Biovista. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Sourcecheck

}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:39, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]