Talk:Bird-safe

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Birds Low‑importance Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Birds To-do: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Wikify : Ninox boobook ocellata • The Institute for Bird Populations (more) Other : Add photos to bird articles needing photos (search Flickr for free images ). Add taxonomic authorities to genus articles. More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo.

The article tells an incorrect reason to explain the vulnerability of birds to damages based on size considerations alone. The real cause that birds are much more sensible to chemicl damage is due to their rapid metabolism, not their small size. Thus, a toxic chemical like decomposing Teflon is processed much more rapidly in the bird's organism. amclaussen. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.100.180.20 (talk) 19:39, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

CAN SOMEONE INTERPRET THE INFORMATION FROM THE GIVEN EXTERNAL LINKS IN THE SUBHEADINGS. PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE THE EXTERNAL LINKS FROM THE SUBHEADINGS UNTIL THE EXTERNAL LINKS' INFORMATION IS INCLUDED IN THE ARTICLE. ANY HELP WILL BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANKS. Birdeditor 01:25, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And a link to parrots —The preceding

Shouldn't that read 'aviculturists'? --Kurt Shaped Box (talk) 03:21, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That'll teach me to accept the spellcheck promps! D'oh! Sabine's Sunbird talk 03:23, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. I was just wondering if you were specifically referring to farmers and their poultry - or something along those lines.

So, what do you make of the 'Disease carriers' section? When parrots are quarantined, is it not the case that they are given a full blood work-up for infectious disease? Unless the person who wrote that section was referring to the 'put them in a cage in the next room' type of quarantine... --Kurt Shaped Box (talk) 03:34, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is a bit vague. I'm guessing it refers to an informal quarantine imposed by the aviculturists rather than a formal quarantine imposed by the state. I don't know much about aviculture really, I just got so annoyed by this article I decided to do some slash and burn editing in order to make it more encyclopaedic and readable. Sometimes we need to remember than editing means editing, and that many overlong and badly written things in life could benefit from a lot of red ink. Sabine's Sunbird talk 03:47, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

EDIT: Forgot to leave my signature; look section below.

I think that this article should be moved to Wikiversity because it is essentially a how-to guide. The main purpose of this article was to be linked to other pet bird articles to help first-time bird owners, and I see it very hard to maintain this article as an encyclopedic entry. Btw I was the one who created this article, and I always intended it to be a "guide", first and foremost, to new bird owners. I think that it would be most appropriate to move it to Wikiversity. I'm also adding inline citations from the "External Links" section. Birdeditor (talk) 19:18, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110910165752/http://www.birdpetsuppliesstore.com/l to http://www.birdpetsuppliesstore.com/l

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—

• a requirement of materials used in water systems equipment for agriculture, industry and end-consumers to resist damage by wild birds (and animals).
• a concern for exposed fishponds in aquaculture
• a bird safety issue of technological equipment (jet engines, wind farms) positioned in wild bird habitats and flyways.

N.B. - I found this page in the Category:Articles needing cleanup from November 2007. The earlier comments Talk:Bird-safe#How-to. and Talk:Bird-safe#Moving to Wikiversity are still pertinent. This requires action by knowledgeable editors. -- Deborahjay (talk) 08:15, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the only remaining mention of bird-proofing as it seemed out of place. Surrealducks (talk) 19:20, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a dab hatnote distinguishing

Bird proofing with a disambiguation page. Reify-tech (talk) 19:56, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060509062412/http://www.birdsafe.com/ to http://www.birdsafe.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:10, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]